Skip to main content

Reflections of the Different Reasons for not Teleworking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1680 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to analyze the reflections of the different reasons for not teleworking on important aspects such as organizational commitment, intention to leave, job satisfaction and burnout. Most existing literature does not look at the different reasons for not teleworking. Four companies with different teleworking practices were selected and two phases survey were carried out. In the first phase, an interview was conducted with the human resources area to obtain information about the telework practice. In the second phase, questionnaires were emailed to all their employees to collect their perceptions: 632 questionnaires were answered, 249 from non-teleworkers. Strong evidence was found to the relationship between employees who were not allowed to telework and greater burnout and intention to leave and lower organizational commitment and satisfaction. The paper shows the importance of a good eligibility process and training for managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrams, D., Ando, K., Hinkle, S.: Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24(10), 1027–1039 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P.: The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 63(1), 1–18 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P.: Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: an examination of construct validity. J. Vocat. Behav. 49(3), 252–276 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., Shockley, K.M.: How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 16(2), 40–68 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caillier, J.G.: The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a US federal government agency. Am. Rev. Public Admin. 42(4), 461–480 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caillier, J.G.: Are teleworkers less likely to report leave intentions in the United States federal government than non-teleworkers are? Am. Rev. Public Admin. 43(1), 72–88 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011425084

  7. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., Klesh, J.: The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cobert, B.F.: Status of Telework in the Federal Government: Report to Congress - Fiscal Years 2014–2015. US Office of Personnel Management, Washington (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Desrosiers, E.I.: Telework and work attitudes: The relationship between telecommuting and employee job satisfaction, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, and perceived co-worker support. 2001. 188f. Thesis (PhD in Philosophy) – Purdue University, EUA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mahler, J.: The telework divide: managerial and personnel challenges of telework. Rev. Public Person. Admin. 32(4), 407–418 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J.: A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 1(1), 61–89 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J.: Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Sage , London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nascimento, J.L., Lopes, A., Salgueiro, M.D.F.: Validation study of Meyer and Allen’s “Organizational Behavior Model” for the Portuguese context (in Portuguese). Comportamento organizacional e gestão 14(1), 115–133 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peters, P., Poutsma, E., den Dulk, L., de Ruijter, J.: May I work from home? Views of the employment relationship reflected in line managers’ telework attitudes in six financial-sector organizations. Equal. Divers. Incl. Int. J. 29(5), 517–531 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SAP Consultores Associados. Home office research - Brazil 2016 (in Portuguese). Campinas/SP: SAP Consultoria em Recursos Humanos (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M.P., Kalimo, R.: The General Burnout Inventory: a self-report questionnaire to assess burnout at the workplace. Work, Stress Health 95, 14–16 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A., Anderson, D.R.: Fundamentals of business Statistics (in Portuguese). CENGAGE Learning, São Paulo (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Castro, S., Ferraz, F., Mahler, C., Santos, I. (2021). Reflections of the Different Reasons for not Teleworking. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U., Paletta, L. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80284-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80285-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics