Skip to main content

Worker Engagement in Routinized Structured Activity Circumvention: Using SSAT to Understand the Significance of Involuntary Cognitive Intentionality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1600 Accesses

Abstract

This study explored workers engagement in involuntary cognitive intentionality leading to their circumvention of structured and routinized activities at the workplace. Guided by Bedny and Karwowski’s postulation that activities of individuals are realized by goal-directed actions, informed either by mental or motor conscious processes, as objects of the cognitive psychology of skills and performances, qualitative data was collected from documented interactions between graduate students engaged in research work and their supervisor, and analyzed morphologically to understand the significance of workers involuntary cognitive intentionality in different work setting. It was found that individuals assigned consciously designed and assigned structured activity in work-settings can think that they know how to do such activities better, and even understand everything about how to do the activity properly in their minds. It is concluded that workers involuntary cognitive intentionality makes them circumvent consciously designed and assigned routinized structured activity, yielding outcomes that deviate from expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sanda, M.A.: Mediating subjective task complexity in job design: a critical reflection of historicity in self-regulatory activity. In: Carryl, B. (ed.) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering, pp. 340–350. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_32

  2. Kieras, D., Polson, P.G.: An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 22, 365–394 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrahamsson, L., Johansson, J.: From grounded skills to sky qualifications: a study of workers creating and recreating qualifications, identity and gender at an underground iron ore mine in Sweden. J. Ind. Rel. 48(5), 657–676 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedny, G.Z., Karwowski, W., Bedny, I.S.: Complexity evaluation of computer-based tasks. Int. J. Hum-Comput. Int. 28(4), 236–257 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jian, Z., Zhang, W., Tian, L., Fan, W., Zhong, Y.: Self-deception reduces cognitive load: the role of involuntary conscious memory impairment. Front. Psychol. 10, 1718 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.0171.

  6. Berntsen, D., Jacobsen, A.S.: Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 1093–1104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen, A.S., Johannessen, K.B., Berntsen, D.: Ways of sampling voluntary and involuntary autobiographical memories in daily life. Conscious. Cogn. 30, 156–168 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Turner, C.K.: A principle of intentionality. Front. Psychol. 8, 137 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00137

  9. Pettineli, M.R.: Actions and Explanations. Emotions, Cognition, and Social Interaction: Information from Psychology and New Ideas Topics Self-help. Openstax (2020). http://cnx.org/content/col10403/1.72/

  10. Cushing, D., Gazzaley, A., Morsella, E.: Externally controlled involuntary cognitions and their relations with other representations in consciousness. Conscious. Cogn. 55, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanda, M.A., Johansson, J., Johansson, B., Abrahamsson, L.: Using systemic structural activity approach in identifying strategies enhancing human performance in mining production drilling activity. Theor. Issues Ergonom. Sci. 15(3), 262–282 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hendrick, H.W., Kleiner, B.M.: Macroergonomics: An Introduction to Work System Design. HFES, Santa Monica (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bedny, G.Z., Karwowski, W.: A Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to Human Performance and Work Design. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanda, M.-A.: Dichotomy of historicity and subjective perception of complexity in individuals’ activity goal formation and decision outcomes. In: Ayaz, H., Mazur, L. (eds.) AHFE 2018. AISC, vol. 775, pp. 265–277. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94866-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirabella, A., Wheaton, G.R.: Effects of task Index Variations on Transfer of Training Criteria. Report NAVTRAEQUIPEN 72-C-0126–1. Naval Training Equipment Center, Orlando, Florida. January (AD 773–047/7GA) (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Venda, V.F.: Engineering Psychology and Synthesis of Informational Sources. Manufacturing Publishers, Moscow (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed-Aminu Sanda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sanda, MA. (2021). Worker Engagement in Routinized Structured Activity Circumvention: Using SSAT to Understand the Significance of Involuntary Cognitive Intentionality. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U., Paletta, L. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80284-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80285-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics