Abstract
The phenomenon of power asymmetry is notable in construction contracting. One-sided contracts and ex post-practice of opportunism would seem inevitable. The relationship between owner and contractor is typically one of principal-agent relationship. When dispute between them arises, their power asymmetry would stifle their voluntary participation in mediation. However, research has shown that it is important to have voluntary mediation so that the settlement reached will be honoured. This stick examines the paradox between power asymmetry and voluntary participation in mediation. Contractual use of mediation is the prevalent approach with voluntary participation as one of the paramount design considerations. Power asymmetry can be less a problem as unwilling party would not be pushed to attempt mediation. In the circumstances, of court encouraged on court-annexed approach, backfiring by the unwilling party cannot be underestimated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McKenzie DM (2015) The role of mediation in resolving workplace relationship conflict. Int J Law Psychiatry 39:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.021
The Hong Kong Judiciary (2019a) Mediation statistics for building management cases. Retrieved from https://mediation.judiciary.hk/en/figuresandstatistics.html
The Hong Kong Judiciary (2019b) Mediation statistics for civil justice reform related cases. Retrieved from https://mediation.judiciary.hk/en/figures_and_statistics.html
Legal Reference System (2020) Cases reached construction and arbitration proceedings in the high court of Hong Kong special administrative region. Retrieved from https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/judgment.jsp?L1=HC&L2=CT&AR=14#A14
Cheung SO (2016) 4 Court-connected mediation in Hong Kong. In: Court-connected construction mediation practice: a comparative international review. Routledge, pp 55–77
Katz LV (1993) Compulsory alternative dispute resolution and voluntarism: Two-headed monster or two sides of the coin. J Disp Resol 1
Hilmer SE (2013) Mandatory mediation in Hong Kong: a workable solution based on Australian experiences. China-EU Law J 1(3–4):61–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-012-0016-y
Leung RHM (2014) Hong Kong mediation handbook. Sweet & Maxwell
Meggitt G (2018) The cases for (and agaist) complusory court-connected mediation in Hong Kong. In: 5th Asian law institute conference, pp 22–23
Cheung SO, Suen HC, & Lam TI (2002) Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction. J Constr Eng manage 128(5):409–417
Jehn KA, Rupert J, Nauta A (2006) The effects of conflict asymmetry on mediation outcomes: satisfaction, work motivation and absenteeism. Int J Confl Manag 17(2):96–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060610736594
Ufkes EG, Giebels E, Otten S, van der Zee KI (2012) The effectiveness of a mediation program in symmetrical versus asymmetrical neighbor-to-neighbor conflicts. Int J Confl Manag 23(4):440–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061211267290
Gewurz IG (2001) (Re)designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance. Confl Resolut Q 19(2):135–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890190203
Caputo A (2013) A literature review of cognitive biases in negotiation processes. Int J Confl Manag 24(4):374–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2012-0064
Downie BM (1991) When negotiations fail: causes of breakdown and tactics for breaking the stalemate. Negot J 7(2):175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1991.tb00612.x
Li K, Cheung SO (2020) Alleviating bias to enhance sustainable construction dispute management. J Cleaner Prod 249:119311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119311
Zhu L, Cheung SO (2020) Power of incentivization in construction dispute avoidance. J Leg Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr 12(2):03720001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000368
Gao Y (2018) Effects of interdependence asymmetry of parties in construction conflicts. Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Hong Kong, p 991044058175703400. https://doi.org/10.5353/th_991044058175703414
Coleman PT, Kugler K, Mitchinson A, Chung C, Musallam N (2010) The view from above and below: the effects of power and interdependence asymmetries on conflict dynamics and outcomes in organizations: the view from above and below. Negot Confl Manage Res 3(4):283–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2010.00062.x
Barakat A, Chernobai A, & Wahrenburg M (2014) Information asymmetry around operational risk announcements. J Bank & Finance 48:152–179
Campo S (2012) Risk aversion and asymmetry in procurement auctions: Identification, estimation and application to construction procurements. J Econ 168(1):96–107
Mnookin RH (2003) Strategic barriers to dispute resolution: A comparison of bilateral and multilateral negotiations. Harv Negot L Rev 8(1)
Golan G (2019) Asymmetry in cross-conflict collaboration: is there a gender factor? (2011). In: Golan G (ed) Galia golan: An academic pioneer on the soviet union, peace and conflict studies, and a peace and feminist activist: with a foreword by William Zartman and a Preface by George Breslauer. Springer International Publishing, pp 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95213-0_12
Mitchell CR (1991) Classifying conflicts: asymmetry and resolution. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 518(1):23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716291518001003
French JR, Raven B, Cartwright D (1959) The bases of social power. Classics Organ Theory 7:311–320
Raven BH (1964) Social influence and power. California Univ Los Angeles
Cuevas JM, Julkunen S, Gabrielsson M (2015) Power symmetry and the development of trust in interdependent relationships: the mediating role of goal congruence. Ind Mark Manage 48:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.015
Yu J, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW, Zhao M (2015) Power asymmetry in conflict resolution with application to a water pollution dispute in C hina. Water Resour Res 51(10):8627–8645. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016257
Wolfe RJ, Mcginn KL (2005) Perceived relative power and its influence on negotiations. Group Decis Negot 14(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-3873-8
Barnhizer DD (2005) Inequality of bargaining power. U Colo l Rev 76:139
Frost DE, Stahelski AJ (1988) The systematic measurement of French and Raven’s bases of social power in workgroups. J Appl Soc Psychol 18(5):375–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00023.x
Handley SM, Benton WC (2012) Mediated power and outsourcing relationships. J Oper Manag 30(3):253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.11.004
Balakrishnan S, Koza MP (1993) Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures: theory and evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 20(1):99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(93)90083-2
Bernardo AE, Cai H, Luo J (2001) Capital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard. J Financ Econ 61(3):311–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00065-4
Schmitz PW (2006) Information gathering, transaction costs, and the property rights approach. Am Econ Rev 96(1):422–434. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157722
Schieg M (2008) Strategies for avoiding asymmetric information in construction project management. J Bus Econ Manag 1:47–51
Ceric A (2014) Strategies for minimizing information asymmetries in construction projects: project managers’ perceptions. J Bus Econ Manag 15(3):424–440. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.720601
Xiang P, Zhou J, Zhou X, Ye K (2012) Construction project risk management based on the view of asymmetric information. J Constr Eng Manag 138(11):1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000548
Dembe AE, Boden LI (2000) Moral hazard: a question of morality? New Solutions J Environ Occup Health Policy 10(3):257–279
Succar B (2009) Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom Constr 18(3):357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
Liu LA (2004) Shared mental models in negotiation. Vanderbilt University
Cheung S-O, Ng TST, Wong S-P, Suen HCH (2003) Behavioral aspects in construction partnering. Int J Project Manage 21(5):333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00052-2
Jehn KA, Rispens S, Thatcher SMB (2010) The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Acad Manag J 53(3):596–616. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468978
Ippolito CA, Pruitt DG (1990) Power balancing in mediation: outcomes and implications of mediatosr intervention. Int J Confl Manag 1(4):341–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022688
Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain 1(1):7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
Cheung SO, Li K, Chow OY (2020) Reactive devaluation as a psychological impediment to construction dispute negotiation. J Manag Eng 36(4):04020025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000787
De Dreu CK, Kluwer ES, Nauta A (2008) The structure and management of conflict: fighting or defending the status quo. Group Process Intergroup Relat 11(3):331–353
Poitras J (2005) A study of the emergence of cooperation in mediation. Negot J 21(2):281–300
Mukerji S (2003) Ambiguity aversion and cost-plus procurement contracts
Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013a) Choices, values, and frames. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. World Scientific, pp 269–278
Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013b) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. World Scientific, pp 99–127
Bokhari S, Geltner D (2011) Loss aversion and anchoring in commercial real estate pricing: empirical evidence and price index implications. Real Estate Econ 39(4):635–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00308.x
Bottom WP, Studt A (1993) Framing effects and the distributive aspect of integrative bargaining. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 56(3):459–474
Neale MA, Bazerman MH (1985) The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Acad Manag J 28(1):34–49
Aibinu AA, & Al-Lawati AM (2010). Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations' willingness to participate in e-bidding. Automation in construction 19(6):714–724
Karambayya R, & Reilly AH (1992) Dual earner couples: Attitudes and actions in restructuring work for family. J Organ Behav, 13(6):585–601
Pinkley RL (1990) Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. J appl psychol 75(2):117
Pinkley RL (1992) Dimensions of conflict frame: Relation to disputant perceptions and expectations. Int J Confl Manage
Kahneman D, & Tversky A (2013) Choices, values, and frames. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. 269–278
Segal U (1987) The ellsberg paradox and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach. Int. Econ Rev 175–202
Salanke M (2015) Voluntariness of mediation and cost sanctions for parties refusal to consider mediation: an oxymoron? Academia. Edu) www.Academia.Edu/5169933. Accessed 10
Hanks M (2012) Perspectives on mandatory mediation. UNSWLJ 35:929
Quek D (2009) Mandatory mediation: an oxymoron-examining the feasibility of implementing a court-mandated mediation program. Cardozo J Confl Resol 11:479
Wissler RL (1997) The effects of mandatory mediation: empirical research on the experience of small claims and common pleas courts. Willamette L Rev 33:565
Gazal-Ayal O, Perry R (2014) Imbalances of power in ADR: the impact of representation and dispute resolution method on case outcomes. Law Soc Inquiry 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12063
Landau, Pfetsch (2000) Symmetry and asymmetry in international negotiations. Int Negot 5(1):21–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718060020848631
Dwyer FR (1984) Are two better than one? Bargaining behavior and outcomes in an asymmetrical power relationship. J Consum Res 11(2):680–693. https://doi.org/10.1086/209004
Rindt J, Mouzas S (2015) Exercising power in asymmetric relationships: the use of private rules. Ind Mark Manage 48:202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.018
Moul W (2003) Power parity, preponderance, and war between great powers, 1816–1989. J Conflict Resolut 47(4):468–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703252980
Shapira O, Introduction I (2008) Exploring the concept of power in mediation: mediators’ sources of power and influence tactics 24:37
Carnevale PJ, Pegnetter R (1985) The selection of mediation tactics in public sector disputes: a contingency analysis. J Soc Issues 41(2):65–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb00855.x
Cheung SO, Chow PT, Tse JKM (2015) Performance of mediator tactics in building management disputes. J Manag Eng 31(2):04014033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000230
Yiu KTW, Cheung SO (2007) A study of construction mediator tactics—Part II: the contingent use of tactics. Build Environ 42(2):762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.005
Nelson RM, Beauchamp T, Miller VA, Reynolds W, Ittenbach RF, Luce MF (2011) The concept of voluntary consent. Am J Bioeth 11(8):6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.583318
Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R (2009) Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model. Hastings Cent Rep 39(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.0.0103
Kamuya D, Marsh V, Molyneux S (2011) What we learned about voluntariness and consent: Incorporating “background situations” and understanding into analyses. Am J Bioeth 11(8):31–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.583328
Brunk CG (1979) The problem of voluntariness and coercion in the negotiated plea. Law Soc Rev 527–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053267
Marquardt CA, Wiedman CI (1998) Voluntary disclosure, information asymmetry, and insider selling through secondary equity offerings*. Contemp Account Res 15(4):505–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00569.x
Wu J, Babcock BA (1995) Optimal design of a voluntary green payment program under asymmetric information. J Agric Resour Econ 20(2):316–327
Martínez-Ferrero J, Ruiz-Cano D, García-Sánchez I-M (2016) The causal link between sustainable disclosure and information asymmetry: the moderating role of the stakeholder protection context. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(5):319–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1379
Shi N, Lee MKO, Cheung CMK, Chen H (2010) The continuance of online social networks: how to keep people using facebook? In: 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.369
Rebecca Yen H, Gwinner KP, Su W (2004) The impact of customer participation and service expectation on Locus attributions following service failure. Int J Serv Ind Manag 15(1):7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230410523312
de Jong SB, Van der Vegt GS, Molleman E (2007) The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust. J Appl Psychol 92(6):1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1625
Wang T, Zhao B, Thornhill S (2015) Pay dispersion and organizational innovation: The mediation effects of employee participation and voluntary turnover. Hum Relat 68(7):1155–1181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715575359
Benk S, Budak T (2012) Power and trust as determinants of voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: empirical evidence for the slippery slope framework from Turkey. Afr J Bus Manag 6. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2157
Cowan K, Paswan AK, Van Steenburg E (2015) When inter-firm relationship benefits mitigate power asymmetry. Ind Mark Manage 48:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.013
Fuchs W, Lippi F (2006) Monetary union with voluntary participation1. Rev Econ Stud 73(2):437–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00382.x
Matanda MJ, Ndubisi NO, Jie F (2016) Effects of relational capabilities and power asymmetry on innovativeness and flexibility of sub-sahara Africa small exporting firms. J Small Bus Manage 54(1):118–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12134
Aiello A, Pratto F, Pierro A (2013) Framing social dominance orientation and power in organizational context. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 35(5):487–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.823614
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cao, N., Cheung, S.O. (2022). The Paradox of Power Asymmetry and Voluntary Participation in Construction Dispute Mediation. In: Cheung, S.O. (eds) Construction Dispute Research Expanded. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80256-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80256-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80255-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80256-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)