Skip to main content

Measuring Knowledge Production in Arabic Using Arcif: Statistical Indicators and Impact Factor

  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to present the Arab Citation and Impact Factor (Arcif) as a method to measure the impact of peer-reviewed research journals in the scientific literature published in the Arab world, emphasizing on the criteria used by Arcif for the selection of journals and analysis methods. The history and development of the impact factor at the global level including the different measurement tools that have emerged will be discussed in addition to the use of these measures and their role in ranking universities.

The chapter includes statistical and trend analysis of the impact factor based on Arcif reports published since 2018. The tendency to publish in social sciences and the humanities such as education, economics, business administration, management, library science and media will be discussed. Plans to improve research conduct and the quality of science publishing in order to create maximum impact on social and economic development, and to improve citations and university ranking will be also addressed.

Keywords

  • Arcif
  • Bobiolomertic analysis
  • Arab countries
  • Arabic Scientific Journals
  • Journlas Selection Criteria
  • Citation analysis
  • Impact Factor

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80122-9_7
  • Chapter length: 28 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-80122-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc 24:348–349. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236031787_Statistical_Bibliography_or_Bibliometrics

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broadus R (1987) Early approaches to bibliometrics. J Am Soc Inform Sci 38(2):127–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198703)38:2<127::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-K

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Christenson JA, Sigelman L (1985) Accrediting knowledge: journal stature and citation impact in social science. Reprint from Soc Sci Quart 66:964–975. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v10p265y1987.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kostoff R (1998) The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics 43:27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458392

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarivate Analytics. Web of Science. https://clarivate.com/products/web-of-science/

  6. Elsevier. Scopus fact sheet https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/114533/Scopus_GlobalResearch_Factsheet2019_FINAL_WEB.pdf

  7. Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/

  8. ResearchGate: Discover scientific knowledge and stay connected to the world of science. https://www.researchgate.net/

  9. Microsoft Academic. Research more, search less. https://academic.microsoft.com/home

  10. Martín-Martín A, Thelwall M, Orduna-Malea E, López-Cózcar ED (2020) Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics 126:871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Garfield E (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295:1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122:108–111. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v6p468y1983.pdf

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Garfield E (1963) Science citation index. Science Citation Index 1961, 1, p v–xvi, http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/80.pdf

  14. Clarivate Analytics. Journal Citation Reports https://clarivate.com/products/journal-citation-reports/

  15. Onex and Baring Private Equity Asia. Onex and Baring Asia Complete Acquisition of Thomson Reuters’ Intellectual Property & Science Business. https://www.onex.com/static-files/5c50c58b-84a8-49df-af0b-836cb747244c

  16. Thomas CG (2018) What is the difference between impact factor and Scopus? https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_difference_between_impact_factor_and_scopus

  17. Macháček V, Srholec M (2021) Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4

  18. University of Waterloo Working Group on Bibliometrics (2016) White paper on bibliometrics, measuring research outputs through bibliometrics. University of Waterloo, Waterloo. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3302.5680

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoeffel C (1998) Journal impact factors. Allergy: European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 53(12):1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03848.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Frank M (2003) Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? J Med Libr Assoc 91(1):4–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12568151/

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz MA, Greco OT, Braile DM (2009) Journal impact factor: this editorial, academic and scientific influence. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 24(3):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382009000400004

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Larivière V, Sugimoto CR (2019) The journal impact factor: a brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. In: Glänzel W, Moed HF, Schmoch U, Thelwall M (eds) Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham, pp 3–24. arXiv:1801.08992

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS 102(46):16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Times Higher Education (2020) THE Impact Rankings 2020: methodology. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impact-rankings-2020-methodology

  25. United Nations. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development: the 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

  26. THE Student (2018) THE World University Rankings explained. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/advice/world-university-rankings-explained

  27. QS Top Universities (2021) QS world university rankings methodology. https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology. Accessed 10 Nov 2020

  28. RUR: Round University Ranking. Methodology. https://roundranking.com/methodology.html. Accessed 25 Nov 2020

  29. Clarivate Web of Science. Web of Science platform: Web of Science Core Collection. https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/woscc. Accessed 25 Mar 2021

  30. Abdel Aziz KBS (2015) The impact of international publishing on university ranking: a case study on Cairo University. Cybrarian 1(37):1–32. http://journal.cybrarians.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=688:kareman&catid=273:studies&Itemid=100

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khazendar S (2016) Arab knowledge in scientific journals: new indicators in a modern perspective. J Al-Mustaqbal Al-Arabi 545:40–59. https://search.emarefa.net/ar/detail/BIM-717101

    Google Scholar 

  32. Publishers Global. Countries in publishers directory. https://www.publishersglobal.com/directory/list-countries. Accessed 15 November 2020

  33. Habibzadeh F (2017) Science Publishing in the Orient: A Lost Cause? https://aboutislam.net/science/science-tech/science-publishing-orient-lost-cause/

  34. Tadmouri GO, Tadmouri NB (2003) Biomedical publications in an unstable region: the Arab world, 1988–2002. Lancet 362(9397):1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14868-4

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Zyoud SH, Sweileh W, Al-Jabi S (2015) Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of integrative and complementary medicine: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med 15:308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0840-z

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Khalifa M (2017) Evaluation of Arab scientific journals according the international criteria of citations databases and journals directories: library and information science journals as a model. Cybrarians J 48. http://www.journal.cybrarians.org/images/048/Cybrarians_Journal_048_Papers_05.pdf

  37. The directory of open access journals. https://doaj.org/. Accessed 10 Jan 2021

  38. Demeter M (2019) The world systematic dynamics of knowledge production: the distribution of transnational academic capital in the social sciences. J World Syst Res 25:1. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2019.887

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization (1996) Index Medicus for the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region [IMEMR]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/119560

  40. World Health Organization the Regional Office of Eastern Mediterranean (EMRO). Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR): bibliometrics analysis of Arab countries. https://vlibrary.emro.who.int/searchd/?database=imemr&records=

  41. Salager-Meyer F (2008) Scientific publishing in developing countries: challenges for the future. J Engl Acad Purp 7(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. Association of Arab Universities. Specialized journals. www.bit.ly/3rPBtis

  43. Shehata AMK, Elgllab MFM (2018) Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: falling in the predatory journals trap. Learned Publishing 31:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1167

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  44. Association of Arab University. http://www.aaru.edu.jo/Home.aspx

  45. e-Marefa. The founder. https://emarefa.net/about-us/the-founder/

  46. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2018) World Intellectual Property Indicators 2018. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4369

  47. e-Marefa. https://emarefa.net/about-us/why-marefa/

  48. Hattab E (2017) Social networks impact on information consumption and usage: e-Marefa Case. In: Taha et al (eds) Social Media Shaping e-Publishing and Academia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55354-2. (ISBSN: 978-3-319-55354-2)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  49. e-Marefa. Arcif analytics. http://emarefa.net/arcif/

  50. e-Marefa. Journals’ selection process. Arab Citation & Impact Factor (Arcif). http://emarefa.net/arcif/criteria/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najeeb Al-Shorbaji .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Al-Shorbaji, N. (2022). Measuring Knowledge Production in Arabic Using Arcif: Statistical Indicators and Impact Factor. In: Badran, A., Baydoun, E., Hillman, J.R. (eds) Higher Education in the Arab World: Research and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80122-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80122-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80121-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80122-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)