Skip to main content

Agroforestry for Ecosystem Services: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services

Abstract

Research over the past two decades has provided solid evidence for many of the ecosystem services (ES) of agroforestry (AF). The main objective of this book is to synthesize the relevant literature from around the globe. The book not only covers the ES related to soil, air, water, food security, biodiversity conservation, and pollination, but also discusses allied topics such as agroforestry design, cultural values, and economic valuation of ES services. In addition, we also have included two country-specific case studies. These include carbon sequestration potential in India and ES services of AF in Australia. Major findings and suggestions from each chapter will also be presented in this introduction chapter to explain how AF can mitigate and lessen impacts on critical global issues. These chapters have confirmed that adoption of AF can help reduce soil and land degradation, water pollution, flooding, food insecurity, and biodiversity decline. These chapters have described how AF improves provisional, regulating, supporting, and cultural ES. Chapters on soil services indicated that soil carbon addition of AF was the main factor for increasing resiliency of ecosystems to climate change threats. The perennial components of AF help improve water quality due to its direct influence on nutrient cycling and also its indirect influence through the modification of soil properties. Chapters on silvopasture clearly demonstrate that properly managed silvopastoral systems improve the environment, not only animal welfare, but land productivity and resource-use efficiency as well while providing better economic returns. Another review showed that pollination can be enhanced by agroforestry by creating new and enhancing existing habitat. Agroforestry can reduce flooding and improve air quality due to the presence of trees. Chapters on cultural services, designing AF, and economics showed the importance of these concepts to improve AF adoption although the literature is still limited on these topics. Although AF is not the sole solution for every current issue like climate change, food insecurity, biodiversity decline, and environmental degradation, its broader adoption as part of a multifunctional working landscape can definitely offer much-needed help.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AF:

Agroforestry

AQ:

Air quality

BD:

Biodiversity

CS:

Carbon sequestration

ES:

Ecosystem services

NPSP:

Nonpoint-source pollution

SH:

Soil health

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

SOM:

Soil organic matter

UFF:

Urban food forests

References

  • Adhikari P, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Gantzer CJ (2014) Soil thermal properties under prairies, conservation buffers, and corn/soybean land use systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1977–1986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akdemir E, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP (2016) Influence of agroforestry buffers on soil hydraulic properties relative to row crop management. Soil Sci 181:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alagele SM, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Veum KS, Rankoth LM (2020) Long-term perennial management and cropping effects on soil microbial biomass for claypan soils. Agron J 112:815–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen SC, Jose S, Nair PKR, Brecke BJ, Nkedi-Kizza P, Ramsey CL (2004) Safety-net role of tree roots: evidence from a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)–cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. For Ecol Manag 192:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Seobi T, Garrett HE (2009) Soil water content and infiltration in agroforestry buffer strips. Agrofor Syst 75:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9128-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Whittaker RJ (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bainard LD, Kochb AM, Gordon AM, Newmaster SG, Thevathasan NV, Klironomosb JN (2011) Influence of trees on the spatial structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in a temperate tree-based intercropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayas JMR, Bullock JM (2012) Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 15:883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugg RL, Sarrantonio M, Dutcher JD, Phatak SC (1991) Understory cover crops in pecan orchards: possible management systems. Am J Alt Agric 6:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buresh RJ, Tian G (1998) Soil improvement by trees in sub-Saharan Africa. Agrofor Syst 38:51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart MR, James DE (1999) Agricultural-nitrogen contributions to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. J Environ Qual 28:850–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone NW (2012) Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992–2009. PLoS One 7(5):e37235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037235

  • Chinnamani S (1993) Agroforestry research in India: a brief review. Agroforest Syst 23: 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704919

  • Chu B, Goyne KW, Anderson SH, Lin CH, Udawatta RP (2010) Veterinary antibiotic sorption to agroforestry buffer, grass buffer, and cropland soils. Agrofor Syst 79:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Beenhouwer MM, Aerts R, Honnay O (2013) A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry. Agric Ecosys Environ 175:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano A, Jacobson MG (2018) Soil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis. Agrofor Syst 92:285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0147-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger J, Jose S (2018) Agroforestry for soil health. Agrofor Syst 92:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers EJ, Kremen C, Greenleaf SS, Garber AK, Klein AM (2011) Contribution of pollinator-mediated crops to nutrients in the human food supply. PLoS One 6(6):e21363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • FAO and ITPS (2015) Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR)—Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantzer CJ, Buyanovsky GA, Alberts EE, Remley PA (1987) Effects of soybean and corn residue decomposition on soil strength and splash detachment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:202–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallai N, Salles JM, Settele J, Vaissière BE (2009) Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ 68(3):810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold MA, Garrett HE (2021) Agroforestry nomenclature, concepts, and practices. In: Garrett HE, Jose S, Gold M (eds) North American Agroforestry, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, Villalobos JAG (2007) Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9194-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M, Havlik P, Valin H et al (2013) Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc Nat Acad Sci 110:20888–20893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75(1):3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh RM, Ryberg KR (2012) Has the magnitude of floods across the USA changed with global CO2 levels? Hydrological Sci J 57:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.621895

  • Joffre R, Rambal S, Ratte JP (1999) The dehesa system of southern Spain and Portugal as a natural ecosystem mimic. Agrofor Syst 45:57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2012) Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 85:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Kumar BM, Walter D (2019) Ecological considerations in sustainable silvopasture design and management. Agrofor Syst 93:317–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0065-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Dollinger J (2019) Silvopasture: a sustainable livestock production system. Agrofor Syst 93:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00366-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir EM, Webb EL (2009) Can Homegardens Conserve Biodiversity in Bangladesh? Biotropica 40:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur B, Singh B, Kaur N, Singh D (2018) Phytoremediation of cadmium contaminated soil through multipurpose tree species. Agrofor Syst 92:473–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1997) Pollinators, flowering plants, and conservation biology. Bioscience 47:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2007) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Anderson SH, Bricknell LG, Udawatta RP (2008) Soil hydraulic properties influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for grazed pasture systems. J Soil Water Conserv 63:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Kallenbach RL (2012) Water infiltration influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for a grazed pasture system. Agrofor Syst 84:325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9474-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyah S, Whitney CW, Jonsson M, Sileshi GW, Öborn I, Muthuri CW, Luedeling E (2019) Agroforestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 39:47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Alavalapati J, Mercer E (2011) Socio-economic impacts of climate change on rural United States. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16:819–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey RRB (1999) Agroforestry for biodiversity in farming systems. In: Collins WW, Qualset CO (eds) Biodiversity in agroecosystems. CRC Press, New York, pp 127–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerability for crops. Bioscience 58:847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, Goyne KW, Kremer RJ, Lerch RN, Garrett HE (2010) Dissipation of sulfamethazine and tetracycline in the root zone of grass and tree species. J Environ Qual 39:1269–1278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-H, Lerch RN, Goyne KW, Garrett HE (2011) Reducing herbicides and veterinary antibiotic losses from agroecosystems using vegetative buffers. J Environ Qual 40:791–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang X, Zhangm M (2008) Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis. J Environ Qual 37:1667–1674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer PM, Reynolds SK Jr, McCutchen MD, Canfield TJ (2007) Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. J Environ Qual 36:1172–1180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nair VD, Graetz DA (2004) Agroforestry as an approach to minimizing nutrient loss from heavily fertilized soils: the Florida experience. Agrofor Syst 61:269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair VD, Nair PKR, Kalmbacher RS, Ezenwa IV (2007) Reducing nutrient loss from farms through silvopastoral practices in coarse-textured soils of Florida, USA. Ecol Eng 29:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009a) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Gama-Rodriguez EF, Garciad R, Haile SG, Howlett DS, Kumar BM, Mosquera-Losada MR, Saha SK, Takimoto ANG, Tonucci RG (2009b) Soil carbon in agroforestry systems: an unexplored treasure? Nat Prec. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.4061.1

  • Nearing MA (2001) Potential changes in rainfall erosivity in the U.S. with climate change during the 21st century. J Soil Water Conserv 56:229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Pruski FF, O’Neal MR (2004) Expected climate change impact on soil erosion rates: a review. J Soil Water Conserv 59:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polglase P, Paul K, Hawkins C, Siggins A, Turner J, Booth T, Crawford D, Jovanovic T, Hobbs T, Opie K, Almeida A, Carter J (2008) Regional opportunities for agroforestry systems in Australia. RIRDC/L and WA/FWPA/MDBC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program, RIRDC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponisio LC, M’Gonigle LK, Mace KC, Palomino J, de Valpine P, Kremen C (2015) Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc R Soc B 282:20141396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Porto RG, de Almeida RF, Cruz-Neto O (2020) Pollination ecosystem services: a comprehensive review of economic values, research funding and policy actions. Food Sec. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01043-w

  • Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Clements A, Coomes D, Entwistle A, Hodge I, Kapos V, Scharlemann JPW, Sutherland WJ, Vira B (2010) Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329(5997):1298–1303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin H, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP (2016) Water infiltration and soil water content in claypan soils influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers compared to row crop management. Agrofor Syst 90:839–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9899-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sistla SA, Roddy AB, Williams NE, Kramer DB, Stevens K, Allison SD (2016) Agroforestry practices promote biodiversity and natural resource diversity in Atlantic Nicaragua. PLoS One 11(9):e0162529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Colletti JP, Simpkins WW, Udawatta RP, Schultz PL (2009) Riparian and upland buffer practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry, an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 163–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Udawatta RP, Isenhart TM, Colletti JP, Simpkins WW, Schultz PL (2021) Riparian and upland buffer practices. In: Garrett HE, Jose S, Gold MA (eds) North American Agroforestry, an integrated science and practice, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Senaviratne GMMMA, Udawatta RP, Baffaut C, Anderson SH (2013) Agricultural policy environmental extender simulation of three adjacent row-crop watersheds in the claypan region. J Environ Qual 42:726–736. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senaviratne GMMMA, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Baffaut C, Thompson A (2014a) Use of fuzzy rainfall-runoff predictions for claypan watersheds with conservation buffers. J Hydrol 507:1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senaviratne GMMMA, Udawatta RP, Baffaut C, Anderson SH (2014b) Evaluation of a stepwise, multiobjective, multivariable parameter optimization method for the APEX model. J Environ Qual 43:1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.12.0509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senaviratne GMMMA, Udawatta RP, Baffaut C, Lory J, Nelson NO, Bhandari A (2018) Evaluation of four parameterization strategies for the APEX model. Am Society Agricult Biol Eng 61:1603–1617. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seobi T, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ (2005) Influences of grass and agroforestry buffer strips on soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:893–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow S, Brauer D, Clason T (2009) Silvopastoral practices. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American Agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 105–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MW, Arnold DC, Eikenbary RD, Rice NR, Shiferaw A, Cheary BS, Carroll BL (1996) Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Biol Control 6:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskär A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodivers Conserv 10(11):1839–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1998) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 39:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Kessler M, Barkmann J, Bos MM, Buchori D, Erasmi S, Faust H, Gerold G, Glenk K et al (2007) Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. PNAS 104:4973–4978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow B, Boffa J (2006) The potential for agroforestry to contribute to the conservation and enhancement of landscape biodiversity. In: Garrity D, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrott S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya, pp 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes—are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp LA (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int Aff 76(2):283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torralba M, Fagerholm N, Burgess PJ, Moreno G, Plieninger T (2016) Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Biomass, carbon and nitrogen dynamics of multi-species riparian buffers within an agricultural watershed in Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 57:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Jose S (2012) Agroforestry strategies to sequester carbon in temperate North America. Agroforest Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9561-1

  • Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31:1214–1225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Garrett HE, Anderson SH (2008a) Soil enzyme activities and physical properties in a watershed managed under agroforestry and row-crop system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.06.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Garrett HE (2008b) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on high resolution X-ray CT-measured pore characteristics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:295–304. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Garrett HE, Anderson SH (2009) Soil enzyme activities and physical properties in a watershed managed under agroforestry and row-crop system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:98–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Motavalli PP, Garrett HE (2011a) Clay and temperature influences on sensor measured volumetric soil water content. Agrofor Syst 82:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Garrett HE, Kallenbach RL (2011b) Agroforestry buffers for nonpoint source pollution reductions from agricultural watersheds. J Environ Qual 40:800–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ, Jose S (2017) Agroforestry practices and soil ecosystem services. In: Al-Kaisi MM, Lowery B (eds) Soil health and intensification of agroecosystems. Elsevier AP, pp 305–334

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Rankoth LM, Jose S (2019) Agroforestry and biodiversity. Sustainability 11:02879. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Kremer RJ, Garrett HE (2021) Soil health services of agroforestry. In: Garrett HE, Jose S, Gold MA (eds) North American Agroforestry, an integrated science and practice, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2007) Report of the conference of parties on its thirteenth session. Bali, Indonesia. In: United Nations framework convention on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumare A, Groot JJR, Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity. In: Ong CK, Huxley P (eds) Tree-crop interactions. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 319–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Varah A, Jones H, Smith J, Potts SG (2013) Enhanced biodiversity and pollination in UK agroforestry systems. J Sci Food Agric 93(9):2073–2075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, p 297

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shibu Jose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jose, S., Udawatta, R.P. (2021). Agroforestry for Ecosystem Services: An Introduction. In: Udawatta, R.P., Jose, S. (eds) Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80060-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics