Abstract
Portable concrete barrier (PCB) systems are utilized in many situations, including placement adjacent to vertical drop-offs, work zones, and construction areas. Free-standing PCB systems are known to have relatively large deflections when impacted, which may be undesirable when dealing with limited space behind the barrier, such as on a bridge deck or with limited lane width in front of the barrier system. The risk of injury to workers in the work zone or construction area from displaced PCB systems is great. In order to allow PCB systems to be used in space-restricted locations, a variety of PCB stiffening options have been used, including beam stiffening and bolting or pinning the barriers to the pavement. This research evaluated the safety performance of the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) PCB, Type 4 in various stiffening configurations according to the Test Level 3 (TL-3) criteria set forth in MASH 2016. All tested configurations successfully met all the requirements of MASH 2016 test designation no. 3–11 which was a 2,270-kg pickup truck impacting at a speed of 100 km/hr and \(25^\circ\). This research further reviewed and correlated stiffening techniques to dynamic deflection and working widths, as well as barrier segment damage. Implementation guidance is provided for the various PCB stiffening options to help protect the workers in work zone and construction areas.
Keywords
- Crash test
- Temporary concrete barrier
- Portable concrete barrier
- MASH
- Stiffening
- Bolting
- Pinning
- TL-3
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options


















References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Washington, D.C (2009)
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Second Edition., Washington, D.C (2016)
Bhakta, S.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Bielenberg, R.W., Urbank, E.L.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a pinned configuration and grouted toes – Test no. NJPCB-1, TRP-03-338-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018a)
Bhakta, S.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Bielenberg, R.W., Urbank, E.L.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a bolted configuration and grouted toes – Test no. NJPCB-2, TRP-03-340-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018b)
Bhakta, S.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Bielenberg, R.W., Urbank, E.L.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a free-standing configuration – Test no. NJPCB-3, TRP-03-355-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018c)
Bhakta, S.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Bielenberg, R.W., Urbank, E.L.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a free-standing configuration and grouted toes – Test no. NJPCB-4, TRP-03-371-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018d)
Bhakta, S.K., et al.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a box-beam stiffened configuration and grouted toes – Test no. NJPCB-5, TRP-03-372-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018e)
Bhakta, S.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Bielenberg, R.W., Urbank, E.L.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a back side pinned configuration and grouted toes – Test no. NJPCB-6, TRP-03-373-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018f)
Bhakta, S.K., Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Bielenberg, R.W., Urbank, E.L.: Performance evaluation of New Jersey’s portable concrete barrier with a traffic-side pinned configuration and grouted toes – Test no. NJPCB-7, TRP-03-374-18, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2018g)
Bronstad, M., Calcote, L., Kimball Jr, C.: Concrete median barrier research. Vol. 2: FHWA-RD-77-4, Office of Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas (1976)
Buth, C., Campise, W.L., Griffin, L., Love, M., Sicking, D.: Performance limits of longitudinal barrier systems, volume I: summary report, Report No. FHWA/RD-86/153, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations R&D, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (1986)
Buth, C., Hirsch, J.: Performance level 2 bridge railings. Transportation Research Record No. 1258, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (1990)
Fortuniewicz, J.S., Bryden, J.E., Phillips, R.G.: Crash tests of portable concrete median barrier for maintenance zones. Report No. FHWA/NY/RR-82/102, Office of Research, Development, and Technology, Federal Highway Administration, Performed by the Engineering Research and Development Bureau, New York State Department of Transportation, New York (1982)
Lechtenberg, K.A., Faller, R.K., Reid, J.D., Sicking, D.L.: Dynamic Evaluation of a Pinned Anchoring System for New York State’s Temporary Concrete Barriers – Phase II, TRP-03-224-10. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2010)
New Jersey Depatment of Transportation: Roadway Design Manual, Trenton, NJ (2015)
Polivka, K.A., et al.: Performance Evaluation of the Permanent New Jersey Safety Shape Barrier – Update to NCHRP 350 Test No. 3-10 (2214NJ-1), TRP-03-177-06, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2006)
Stolle, C.J., et al.: Evaluation of Box Beam Stiffening of Unanchored Temporary Concrete Barriers, TRP-03-202-08, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska (2008)
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge several sources that made a contribution to this project: (1) New Jersey Department of Transportation for sponsoring this project and (2) MwRSF personnel for constructing the barriers and conducting the crash tests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lechtenberg, K., Fang, C., Faller, R. (2022). Stiffening Guidance for Temporary Concrete Barrier Systems in Work Zone and Construction Situations. In: , et al. Advances in Road Infrastructure and Mobility. IRF 2021. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79800-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79801-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)