Skip to main content

A Structured Approach to Machine Learning Condition Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Monitoring of Rotating Machinery for Industry 4.0

Abstract

The aim of the chapter is to explain the basic concepts of Machine Learning applied to condition monitoring in Industry 4.0. Machine learning is a common term used today in different fields, mainly related to an automated and self-learning routine in a decisional process. This chapter details how a Machine Learning approach may be structured, starting from a distinction between Supervised and Unsupervised approaches. These two classes have different advantages and disadvantages that constrain their application to specific boundary conditions. Machine Learning techniques are the core part of a structured methodology for the condition monitoring, but other phases, such as the pre-processing of data, the feature extraction and the evaluation of performances, are equally important for the success of a condition monitoring system. Together with standard parameters used to assess the performances of the machine learning method, a particular emphasis will be given to the interpretability of the results that can be determinant in the choice and development of a specific tool for condition monitoring in an industrial environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ (2010) Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(1–4):297–313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mobley RK (2002) An introduction to predictive maintenance. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleischmann H, Kohl J, Franke J (2016) A modular architecture for the design of condition monitoring processes. Procedia CIRP 57:410–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frazzon EM, Hartmann J, Makuschewitz T, Scholz-Reiter B (2013) Towards socio-cyber-physical systems in production networks. Procedia Cirp 7:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang K (2016) Intelligent predictive maintenance (ipdm) system–industry 4.0 scenario. WIT Trans Eng Sci 113:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  7. Susto GA, Schirru A, Pampuri S, McLoone S, Beghi A (2015) Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 11(3):812–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IBM, https://www.ibm.com/uk-en/analytics/machine-learning?p1

  9. Bode G, Thul S, Baranski M, Muller D (2020) Real-world application of machine-learning-based fault detection trained with experimental data. Energy 198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Said M, Abdellafou KB, Taouali O (2010) Machine learning technique for data-driven fault detection of nonlinear processes. J Intell Manuf 31:865–884

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdusamad KB, Gao DW, Muljadi E (2013) A condition monitoring system for wind turbine generator temperature by applying multiple linear regression model. In: North American power symposium (NAPS), Manhattan, KS, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wuest T, Weimer D, Irgens C, Thoben K-D (2016) Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Production & Manufacturing Research 4(1):23–45

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deng L, Yu D (2014) Deep learning: methods and applications. Foundations and trends in signal processing 7(3–4):197–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan S, Yairi T (2018) A review on the application of deep learning in system health management. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 107:241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao R, Wang J, Yan R, Mao K (2013) A condition monitoring system for wind turbine generator temperature by applying multiple linear regression model. In: North American power symposium (NAPS), Manhattan, KS, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang F, Dun B, Liu X, Xue Y, Li H, Han Q (2018) An enhancement deep feature extraction method for bearing fault diagnosis based on kernel function and autoencoder. Shock Vibr 6024874

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun W, Zhao R, Yan R, Shao S, Chen X (2017) Convolutional Discriminative Feature Learning for Induction Motor Fault Diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 13(3):1350–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Del Vento D, Fanfarillo A (2019) Traps, pitfalls and misconceptions of machine learning applied to Scientific Disciplines. In: Proceedings of the practice and experience in advanced research computing on rise of the machines (learning), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hill DJ, Minsker BS (2010) Anomaly detection in streaming environmental sensor data: A data-driven modeling approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 25:1014–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill DJ, Minsker BS, Amir E (2007) Real-time Bayesian anomaly detection for environmental sensor data. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Congress of IAHR, International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ge S, Jun L, Liu D, Peng Y (2015) Anomaly detection of condition monitoring with predicted uncertainty for aerospace applications. In: 12th IEEE international conference on electronic measurement & instruments (ICEMI), Qingdao, pp 248–253

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Feng H, Fan Y (2015) Fault detection and classification for complex processes using semi-supervised learning algorithm. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst 149. Part B 15:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Engelen JE, Hoos HH (2020) A survey on semi-supervised learning. Machine Learning 109:373–440

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Shorten C, Khoshgoftaar TM (2019) A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J Big Data 6(1)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cavalaglio Camargo Molano J, Campo F, Capelli L, Massaccesi G, Borghi D, Rubini R, Cocconcelli M (2021) A structured approach to machine learning for condition monitoring: a case study. In: Smart monitoring of rotating machinery for industry 4.0, theory and applications. Springer Applied Condition monitoring book series

    Google Scholar 

  26. Triguero I, Galar M, Vluymans S, Cornelis C., Bustince, H., Herrera, F., Saeys, Y., Evolutionary undersampling for imbalanced big data classification. 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Cheng K, Wang S, Morstatter F, Trevino RP, Tang J, Liu H (2017) Feature selection: a data perspective. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR), 5(1–45)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu S, Lu B, Baldea M, Edgar TF, Wojsznis W, Blevins T, Nixon M (2015) Data cleaning in the process industries. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 31(5):453–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khalid S, Khalil T, Nasreen S (2014) A survey of feature selection and feature extraction techniques in machine learning. In: 2014 Science and Information Conference, pp 372–378

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liang H, Sun X, Sun Y, Gao Y (2017) Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review. EURASIP journal on wireless communications and networking 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Delac K, Grgic M, Grgic S (2005) Independent comparative study of PCA, ICA, and LDA on the FERET data set. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 15(5):252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel RK, Giri VK (2016) Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier. Perspect Sci 8:334–337

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lei Y, Yang B, Jiang X, Jia F, Li N, Nandi AK (2020) Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: a review and roadmap. Mech Syst Signal Process 138

    Google Scholar 

  34. Muralidharan K (2010) A note on transformation, standardization and normalization. Int J Oper Quant Manage IX(1-2):116–122

    Google Scholar 

  35. Widodo A, Bo-Suk Y (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mechanical systems and signal processing 21(6):2560–2574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li C, Sanchez RV, Zurita G, Cerrada M, Cabrera D, Vásquez RE (2016) Gearbox fault diagnosis based on deep random forest fusion of acoustic and vibratory signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 76:283–293

    Google Scholar 

  37. Babu GS, Peilin Z, Xiao-Li L (2016) Deep convolutional neural network based regression approach for estimation of remaining useful life. In: International conference on database systems for advanced applications. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  38. Musoro JZ, Zwinderman AH, Puhan MA, Riet G, Geskus RB (2014) Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data. BMC Med Res Methodol 14(116)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Understanding AUC-ROC Curve https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-auc-roc-curve-68b2303cc9c5

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Cocconcelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Capelli, L. et al. (2022). A Structured Approach to Machine Learning Condition Monitoring. In: Chaari, F., Chiementin, X., Zimroz, R., Bolaers, F., Haddar, M. (eds) Smart Monitoring of Rotating Machinery for Industry 4.0. Applied Condition Monitoring, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79519-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79519-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79518-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79519-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics