Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) has the special ability to provide the user with the illusion of presence in a virtual world. This is one aspect of the valuable potential that VR possesses concerning the design and realization of human–machine interfaces. Whether and how successfully this potential is exploited is not only a technical problem. It is also based on processes of human perception to interpret the sensory stimuli presented by the virtual environment. This chapter deals with basic knowledge from the field of human information processing for a better understanding of the associated perceptual issues. Of particular interest in VR are the perception of space and the perception of movement, which will be dealt with specifically. Based on these fundamentals, typical VR phenomena and problems are discussed, such as double vision and cybersickness. Knowledge of human perception processes can be used to explain these phenomena and to derive solution strategies. Finally, this chapter shows how different limitations of human perception can be utilized to improve the quality and user experience during a VR session.
Dedicated website for additional material: vr-ar-book.org
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barsky BA, Kosloff TJ (2008) Algorithms for rendering depth of field effects in computer graphics. In: Proceedings of 12th WSEAS international conference on computers, pp 999–1010
Bruder G, Pusch A, Steinicke F (2012a) Analyzing effects of geometric rendering parameters on size and distance estimation in on-axis stereographic. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP 12), pp 111–118
Bruder G, Steinicke F, Wieland P, Lappe M (2012b) Tuning self-motion perception in virtual reality with visual illusions. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 18(7):1068–1078
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1986a) The model human processor: an engineering model of human performance. In: Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. 2: cognitive processes and performance, pp 1–35
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1986b) The psychology of human–computer interaction. CRC Press
Cater K, Chalmers A, Ward G (2003) Detail to attention: exploiting visual tasks for visual rendering. In: Proceedings of Eurographics workshop on rendering, pp 270–280
Ernst MO (2008) Multisensory integration: a late bloomer. Curr Biol 18(12):R519–R521
Hagen MA, Elliott HB (1976) An investigation of the relationship between viewing conditions and preference for true and modified perspective with adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:479–490
Hayward V, Astley OR, Cruz-Hernandez M, Grant D, La-Torre GR-D (2004) Haptic interfaces and devices. Sens Rev 24(1):16–29
Hendrix C, Barfield W (1996) Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence Teleop Virt 5(3):274–289
Hoffmann DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K, Banks MS (2008) Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vis 8(3):1–30
Howard IP (2002) Seeing in depth: Vol. 1. Basic mechanisms. I Porteous, Toronto
Interrante V, Anderson L, Ries B (2006) Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. In: Proceedings of IEEE virtual reality 2006, pp 3–10
Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E (1998) A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20:1254–1259
Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal GS (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(3):203–220
Kubovy M (1986) The psychology of linear perspective and renaissance art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kuhl SA, Thompson WB, Creem-Regehr SH (2006) Minification influences spatial judgement in immersive virtual environments. In: Symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization, pp 15–19
Lappe M, Jenkin M, Harris LR (2007) Travel distance estimation from visual motion by leaky path integration. Exp Brain Res 180:35–48
Lawson B (2015) Motion sickness symptomatology and origins. In: Hale KS, Stanney KM (eds) Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. CRC Press, pp 532–587
Le Meur O, Le Callet P, Barba D, Thoreau D (2006) A coherent computational approach to model the bottom-up visual attention. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(5):802–817
Lee CH, Varshney A, Jacobs DW (2005) Mesh saliency. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, pp 659–666
Loomis JM, Knapp JM (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Hettinger LJ, Haas MW (eds) Virtual and adaptive environments. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Malaka R, Butz A, Hußmann H (2009) Media informatics – an introduction. Pearson, Munich
Marr D (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. MIT Press, Cambridge
McCauley ME, Sharkey TJ (1992) Cybersickness: perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence Teleop Virt 1(3):311–318
Mendiburu B (2009) 3D movie making: stereoscopic digital cinema from script to screen. Focal Press, New York
Mon-Williams M, Wann JP (1998) Binocular virtual reality displays: when problems do and don’t occur. Hum Factors 40(1):42–49
Myszkowski K (2002) Perception-based global illumination, rendering and animation techniques. In: Spring conference on computer graphics, pp 13–24
Ooi TL, Wu B, He ZJ (2001) Distance determination by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature 414:197–200
Preim B, Dachselt R (2015) Interaktive Systeme (Band 2). Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W (2003) The role of effort in distance perception. Psychol Sci 14:106–112
Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA (1991) An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol Psychol 3(3):195–240
Sharp H, Preece J, Rogers Y (2019) Interaction design: beyond human–computer interaction. Wiley, Indianapolis
Shneiderman B, Plaisant C, Cohen M, Jacobs S, Elmqvist N, Diakopoulos N (2018) Designing the user interface – strategies for effective human–computer interaction. Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow
Simons DJ, Chabris CF (1999) Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28(9):1059–1074
Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A (1994) Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleop Virt 3:130–144
Steinicke F, Bruder G, Kuhl S, Willemsen P, Lappe M, Hinrichs KH (2009) Judgment of natural perspective projections in head-mounted display environments. In: Proceedings of VRST 2009, pp 35–42
Steinicke F, Bruder G, Jerald J, Frenz H, Lappe M (2010a) Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 16(1):17–27
Steinicke F, Bruder G, Hinrichs KH, Steed A (2010b) Gradual transitions and their effects on presence and distance estimation. Comput Graph 34(1):26–33
Stone B (1993) Concerns raised about eye strain in VR systems. Real-Time Graph 2(4):1–13
Treisman M (1977) Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 197:493–495
Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12(1):97–136
Vishwanath D, Girshick AR, Banks MS (2005) Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nat Neurosci 8(10):1401–1410
Wanger LR, Ferwander JA, Greenberg DA (1992) Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 12(3):44–58
Ware C (2000) Information visualization – perception for design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
Ware C, Gobrecht C, Paton M (1998) Dynamic adjustment of stereo display parameters. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 28(1):56–65
Williams SP, Parrish RV (1990) New computational control techniques and increased understanding for 3-D displays. In: Proceedings of SPIE Stereoscopic Display Applications, pp 73–82
Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 7(3):225–240
Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2004) Perceiving distance: a role of effort and intent. Perception 33:577–590
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Recommended Reading
The ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP) as well as the journal Transaction on Applied Perception (TAP) deal with multisensory perception in virtual worlds.
Recommended Reading
-
Goldstein EB (2016) Sensation and Perception (10th edn). Cengage Learning, Belmont – Standard work from the psychology of perception which is not limited to visual perception. Very informative and with many examples.
-
Thompson WB, Fleming WF, Creem-Regehr SH, Stefanucci JK (2011) Visual Perception from a Computer Graphics Perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton – Textbook which also explains essential aspects of perception for VR and always makes the connection to computer graphics.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doerner, R., Steinicke, F. (2022). Perceptual Aspects of VR. In: Doerner, R., Broll, W., Grimm, P., Jung, B. (eds) Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79062-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79062-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79061-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79062-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)