Abstract
Hedonia and eudaimonia are motivating forces through which individuals pursue well-being. The latter is a multidimensional concept, while hedonia and eudaimonia, both of which are realized through the reward system of the brain, are known to influence each other. Researchers have shown that specific extrinsic values (e.g., material wealth, power over other people, etc.) are associated with a sense of “good life” and may influence both hedonia and eudaimonia. The HEEMA (Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Extrinsic Motives for Activities) scale was developed to evaluate all three ways of seeking well-being, hedonia, eudaimonia, and extrinsic values, in both a healthy and unhealthy fashion. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the HEEMA scale in a sample of 225 Greek individuals. Participants filled the HEEMA, SWLS, MLQ, Self-Esteem questionnaire, DASS-21, MHC-SF, and Big Five Inventory, anonymously. Reliability and validity indices of the scales were satisfactory (Cronbach’s α were 0.734, 0.811, and 0.843 for the hedonic, eudaimonic, and extrinsic motives subscales, respectively). Indicatively, the study showed a positive correlation between aspects of well-being and positive emotions, satisfaction with life, sense of meaning and purpose, as well as with specific personality traits, while negative correlations were found between eudaimonic orientation and depression.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
World Health Organization (2014) Construction in basic documents. WHO, Geneva
Huta V (2013) Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: distinctions, similarities, and relationships, pp 139–158
Behzadnia B, Ryan R (2018) Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations in physical education and their relations with motivation and wellness. Int J Sport Psychol 49:363–385
Huta V, Ryan R (2010) Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. J Happiness Stud 11:735–762
Waterman AS, Schwartz SJ, Zamboanga BL, Ravert RD, Williams MK, Agocha VB et al (2010) The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. J Posit Psychol 5:41–61
Aristotle (1925) The Nicomachean Ethics (Trans. by D. Ross). Oxford University Press, New York
Turban DB, Yan W (2016) Relationship of eudaimonia and hedonia with work outcomes. J Manag Psychol 31:1006–1020
Huta V (2012) Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role Modeling. J Happiness Stud 13:47–61
Deci EL, Ryan RM (2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. J Happiness Stud 9:1–11
Huta V, Waterman A (2014) Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. J Happiness Stud 15:1425–1456
Asano R, Tsukamoto S, Igarashi T, Huta V (2018) Psychometric properties of measures of hedonic and eudaimonic orientations in Japan: The HEMA scale. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9954-z
Huta V (2015) An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts
Anić P, Tončić M (2013) Orientations to happiness, subjective well-being and life goals. Psihol Teme 22:135–153
Baselmans BML, Bartels M (2018) A genetic perspective on the relationship between eudaimonic –and hedonic well-being. Sci Rep 8:1–10
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52:141–166
Disabato D, Goodman F, Kashdan T, Short J, Aaron J (2015) Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychol Assess 28:471
Keyes CLM, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD (2002) Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:1007–1022
Huta V (2014) The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice
Kasser T, Ryan RM (1996) Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 22:280–287
Asano R, Igarashi T, Tsukamoto S (2014) The hedonic and eudaimonic motives for activities (HEMA) in Japan: the pursuit of well-being. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 85:69–79
Braaten A, Huta V, Tyrany L, Thompson A (2019) Hedonic and eudaimonic motives toward university studies: how they relate to each other and to well-being derived from school. J Posit Psychol Wellbeing 3:179–196
Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cult Psychol 1:185–216
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 49:71–75
Stalikas A, Lakioti A (2012) Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). In: Stalikas A, Triliva S, Roussi P (eds) Psychometric instruments in Greece, 2nd edn. Pedio, Athens
Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, Princeton University Press
Galanou C, Galanakis M, Alexopoulos E, Darviri C (2014) Rosenberg self-esteem scale Greek validation on student sample. Psychology 05:819–827
Spanea E, Anagnostopoulos F, Kalantzi-Azizi A, Skarlos D (2005) Psychosocial factors and adjustment to breast cancer: a structural equation model. Hell J Psychol 2:159–182
Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M (2006) The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol 53:80–93
Pezirkianidis C, Galanakis M, Karakasidou I, Stalikas A (2016) Validation of the meaning in life questionnaire (MLQ) in a Greek sample. Psychology 07:1518–1530
Daskalou S (2012) Positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). In: Stalikas A, Triliva S, Roussi P (eds) Psychometric instruments in Greece. Pedio, Athens
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 33:335–343
Lyrakos GN, Arvaniti C, Smyrnioti M, Kostopanagiotou G (2011) Translation and validation study of the depression anxiety stress scale in the greek general population and in a psychiatric patient’s sample. Eur Psychiatry 26:1731
Pezirkianidis C, Karakasidou E, Lakioti A, Stalikas A, Galanakis M (2018) Psychometric properties of the depression, anxiety, stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek sample. Psychology 09:2933–2950
Keyes CLM, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, Temane M, Kruger A, van Rooy S (2008) Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother 15:181–192
John O, Donahue E, Kentle R (1991) The big five inventory – versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, Berkeley
Ifantopoulou PN, Artemiadis AK, Triantafyllou N, Chrousos G, Papanastasiou I, Darviri C (2015) Self-esteem is associated with perceived stress in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Res 37:588–592
Ryff CD, Singer BH (2008) Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J Happiness Stud 9:13–39
Waterman AS, Schwartz SJ, Conti R (2008) The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. J Happiness Stud 9:41–79
Joshanloo M, Rastegar P, Bakhshi A (2012) The big five personality domains as predictors of social wellbeing in Iranian university students. J Soc Pers Relat 29:639–660
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Koumantarou Malisiova, E. et al. (2021). Validation of the Greek Version of Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Extrinsic Motives for Activities (HEEMA) Instrument. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2020. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1337. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78771-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78771-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78770-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78771-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)