Skip to main content

Validation of the Greek Version of Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Extrinsic Motives for Activities (HEEMA) Instrument

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
GeNeDis 2020

Abstract

Hedonia and eudaimonia are motivating forces through which individuals pursue well-being. The latter is a multidimensional concept, while hedonia and eudaimonia, both of which are realized through the reward system of the brain, are known to influence each other. Researchers have shown that specific extrinsic values (e.g., material wealth, power over other people, etc.) are associated with a sense of “good life” and may influence both hedonia and eudaimonia. The HEEMA (Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Extrinsic Motives for Activities) scale was developed to evaluate all three ways of seeking well-being, hedonia, eudaimonia, and extrinsic values, in both a healthy and unhealthy fashion. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the HEEMA scale in a sample of 225 Greek individuals. Participants filled the HEEMA, SWLS, MLQ, Self-Esteem questionnaire, DASS-21, MHC-SF, and Big Five Inventory, anonymously. Reliability and validity indices of the scales were satisfactory (Cronbach’s α were 0.734, 0.811, and 0.843 for the hedonic, eudaimonic, and extrinsic motives subscales, respectively). Indicatively, the study showed a positive correlation between aspects of well-being and positive emotions, satisfaction with life, sense of meaning and purpose, as well as with specific personality traits, while negative correlations were found between eudaimonic orientation and depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization (2014) Construction in basic documents. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huta V (2013) Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: distinctions, similarities, and relationships, pp 139–158

    Google Scholar 

  3. Behzadnia B, Ryan R (2018) Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations in physical education and their relations with motivation and wellness. Int J Sport Psychol 49:363–385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huta V, Ryan R (2010) Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. J Happiness Stud 11:735–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Waterman AS, Schwartz SJ, Zamboanga BL, Ravert RD, Williams MK, Agocha VB et al (2010) The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. J Posit Psychol 5:41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aristotle (1925) The Nicomachean Ethics (Trans. by D. Ross). Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turban DB, Yan W (2016) Relationship of eudaimonia and hedonia with work outcomes. J Manag Psychol 31:1006–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huta V (2012) Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role Modeling. J Happiness Stud 13:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. J Happiness Stud 9:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huta V, Waterman A (2014) Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. J Happiness Stud 15:1425–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asano R, Tsukamoto S, Igarashi T, Huta V (2018) Psychometric properties of measures of hedonic and eudaimonic orientations in Japan: The HEMA scale. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9954-z

  12. Huta V (2015) An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anić P, Tončić M (2013) Orientations to happiness, subjective well-being and life goals. Psihol Teme 22:135–153

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baselmans BML, Bartels M (2018) A genetic perspective on the relationship between eudaimonic –and hedonic well-being. Sci Rep 8:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52:141–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Disabato D, Goodman F, Kashdan T, Short J, Aaron J (2015) Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychol Assess 28:471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keyes CLM, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD (2002) Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:1007–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huta V (2014) The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kasser T, Ryan RM (1996) Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 22:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asano R, Igarashi T, Tsukamoto S (2014) The hedonic and eudaimonic motives for activities (HEMA) in Japan: the pursuit of well-being. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 85:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Braaten A, Huta V, Tyrany L, Thompson A (2019) Hedonic and eudaimonic motives toward university studies: how they relate to each other and to well-being derived from school. J Posit Psychol Wellbeing 3:179–196

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cult Psychol 1:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 49:71–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stalikas A, Lakioti A (2012) Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). In: Stalikas A, Triliva S, Roussi P (eds) Psychometric instruments in Greece, 2nd edn. Pedio, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Galanou C, Galanakis M, Alexopoulos E, Darviri C (2014) Rosenberg self-esteem scale Greek validation on student sample. Psychology 05:819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spanea E, Anagnostopoulos F, Kalantzi-Azizi A, Skarlos D (2005) Psychosocial factors and adjustment to breast cancer: a structural equation model. Hell J Psychol 2:159–182

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M (2006) The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol 53:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pezirkianidis C, Galanakis M, Karakasidou I, Stalikas A (2016) Validation of the meaning in life questionnaire (MLQ) in a Greek sample. Psychology 07:1518–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Daskalou S (2012) Positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). In: Stalikas A, Triliva S, Roussi P (eds) Psychometric instruments in Greece. Pedio, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 33:335–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lyrakos GN, Arvaniti C, Smyrnioti M, Kostopanagiotou G (2011) Translation and validation study of the depression anxiety stress scale in the greek general population and in a psychiatric patient’s sample. Eur Psychiatry 26:1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pezirkianidis C, Karakasidou E, Lakioti A, Stalikas A, Galanakis M (2018) Psychometric properties of the depression, anxiety, stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek sample. Psychology 09:2933–2950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Keyes CLM, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, Temane M, Kruger A, van Rooy S (2008) Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother 15:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. John O, Donahue E, Kentle R (1991) The big five inventory – versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ifantopoulou PN, Artemiadis AK, Triantafyllou N, Chrousos G, Papanastasiou I, Darviri C (2015) Self-esteem is associated with perceived stress in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Res 37:588–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ryff CD, Singer BH (2008) Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J Happiness Stud 9:13–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Waterman AS, Schwartz SJ, Conti R (2008) The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. J Happiness Stud 9:41–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Joshanloo M, Rastegar P, Bakhshi A (2012) The big five personality domains as predictors of social wellbeing in Iranian university students. J Soc Pers Relat 29:639–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flora Bacopoulou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Koumantarou Malisiova, E. et al. (2021). Validation of the Greek Version of Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Extrinsic Motives for Activities (HEEMA) Instrument. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2020. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1337. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78771-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics