Skip to main content

How to Approach an Organization Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organization Design
  • 1292 Accesses

Abstract

The organization designer has two important dimensions to consider when approaching an organization design project. One is the mode of intervention, which can range from providing expert knowledge to the client to engaging in a collaborative process. The second dimension is the number of people involved in the design process, which can range from just a few members of the leadership team to groups of up to thousands (in so-called large group interventions). The approach described here uses a collaborative approach that engages a design team of a manageable size. The design team represents the organization and is mandated by the leadership team to perform the design work. Elements of approaches from other design disciplines can offer useful inspiration for the organization design approach, such as the importance of prototyping and testing. Still, a lot of challenging aspects of the design process remain, especially having to do with the inevitable political aspects at play. Data-driven tools that support the organization design process are increasingly on offer. They may offer support in analyzing the current situation, in prototyping design options, and even in generating new designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recounted by the man himself (Hock, 1999, 2005).

  2. 2.

    See Dannemiller Tyson Associates (2000).

  3. 3.

    For an overview, see Holman et al. (2007).

  4. 4.

    Exceptions notwithstanding, such as Chasserio and Botte (2020).

  5. 5.

    A term used by Paul Tolchinsky (personal communication, March 2021).

  6. 6.

    See Forsyth (2019) for a general introduction in group dynamics and Bunker and Alban (2006) and Holman et al. (2007) for methodologies in large group interventions.

  7. 7.

    This section draws on Chap. 6 of Van Bree (2014).

  8. 8.

    Personal communication (March 2021).

  9. 9.

    We will cover this stage in more depth in Chap. 9.

  10. 10.

    See https://www.orgvue.com

  11. 11.

    See Chap. 4 for more on this important design principle.

  12. 12.

    Some striking limitations are its focus on agent interdependence rather than task interdependence, its use of the predesign situation as the measure of interdependence, and its bottom-up approach of clustering roles (rather than a top-down approach of clustering tasks, as put forward in this book).

References

  • Bartunek, J. M., Balogun, J., & Do, B. (2011). Considering planned change anew: Stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally, and meaningfully. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (2006). The handbook of large group methods: Creating systemic change in organizations and communities. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasserio, S., & Botte, S. (2020). Transforming corporate headquarters: A case study of a collaborative journey. Journal of Organization Design, 9(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherns, A. (1987). Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human Relations, 40(3), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannemiller Tyson Associates. (2000). Whole-Scale Change: Unleashing the magic in organizations. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, E., Jones, S., & Van de Ven, A. (2013). Organizing healthcare for changing markets: The case of Ascension Health. Journal of Organization Design, 2(3), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, T. (2019). Game design workshop: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R., Downey, D., & Kates, A. (2002). Designing dynamic organizations: A hands-on guide for leaders at all levels. AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, D. (1999). Birth of the chaordic age. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, D. (2005). One from many: VISA and the rise of chaordic organization. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, P., Devane, T., & Cady, S. (Eds.). (2007). The change handbook: The definitive resource on today’s best methods for engaging whole systems (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesler, G., & Kates, A. (2011). Leading organization design: How to make organization design decisions to drive the results you want. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livijn, M. (2019). Navigating in a hierarchy: How middle managers adapt macro design. Journal of Organization Design, 8(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. W., Lu, L., Peng, J., & Tsui, A. S. (2017). Microdivisionalization: Using teams for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova, N., & Devinney, T. (2012). The nature of client-consultant interaction: A critical review. In T. Clark & M. Kipping (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management consulting. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., & Clement, J. (2020). The organizational analytics e-book: A guide to data driven organization design. Retrieved February 4, 2021, from https://knowledge.insead.edu/sites/www.insead.edu/files/images/org2.0ebook.pdf

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1990). A general philosophy of helping: Process consultation. Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, N. (2018). Organization design: The practitioner’s guide (3rd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bree, J. (2014). Game based organization design: New tools for complex organizational systems. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M., & Janoff, S. (2010). Future Search: Getting the whole system in the room for vision, commitment and action (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worley, G. W., Mohrman, S. A., & Nevitt, J. A. (2011). Large group interventions: An empirical field study of their composition, process, and outcomes. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 404–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worren, N. (2017). The matrix as a transitory form: The evolution of FMC technologies 2001–2016. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worren, N. (2018). Organization design: Simplifying complex systems (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Worren, N., Christiansen, T., & Soldal, K. V. (2020). Using an algorithmic approach for grouping roles and sub-units. Journal of Organization Design, 9(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worren, N., Van Bree, J., & Zybach, W. (2019). Organization design challenges: Results from a practitioner survey. Journal of Organization Design, 8(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Bree, J. (2021). How to Approach an Organization Design. In: Organization Design. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78679-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics