Skip to main content

Model-Based Systems Engineering: Discovering Potentials for Methodical Modular Product Development

  • 1425 Accesses

Abstract

A constantly growing market variety results in an increasing internal variety, which is reflected in increased variety costs. In order to cope with this situation, different methods for the development of modular product families and their modular product architectures were developed. During the implementation of these methods, different product data come together, which are linked in different tools. At this point, a document-based approach reaches its limits and inconsistencies occur. To counteract, the trend of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is being integrated into methodical modular product development. Using the example of method units of the Integrated PKT Approach for the Development of Modular Product Families, it is shown how the deposit of a meta model of product data enables consistency. The consistent model of the method units Design for Variety and Life Phases Modularization is extended by two elements: Configuration systems and the effects of modular product architectures. A configuration system based on this enables the efficient addressing of customer requirements in sales. The linking of the effects of modular product architectures strengthens the objective of Life Phases Modularization. Furthermore, the resulting consistent overall model generates several analysis options and opens up new possibilities, such as the establishment of Digital Twins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_14
  • Chapter length: 21 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-78368-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 14.1
Fig. 14.2
Fig. 14.3
Fig. 14.4
Fig. 14.5
Fig. 14.6
Fig. 14.7
Fig. 14.8

References

  • Albers A, Reiss N, Bursac N, Richter T (2016) iPeM—integrated product engineering model in context of product generation engineering. In: Wang L, Kjellberg T (eds) Procedia CIRP design conference 2016. Elsevier, pp 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168

  • Albers A, Bursac N, Scherer H, Birk C, Powelske J, Muschik S (2019) Model-based systems engineering in modular design. Des Sci 5:183. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Alt O (2012) Modellbasierte Systementwicklung mit SysML. Carl Hanser, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431270

  • Bender B, Feldhusen J, Krause D, Beckmann G, Paetzold K, Hövel A (2018) Grundlagen techni-scher Systeme und des methodischen Vorgehens. In: Grote K-H, Bender B, Göhlich D (eds) Dubbel. Springer, Berlin, pp 372–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54805-9_41

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvoisin J, Halstenberg F, Buchert T, Stark R (2016) A systematic literature review on modular product design. J Eng Des 27:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1166482

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Delligatti L (2013) SysML distilled: A brief guide to the systems modeling language. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichmann O, Melzer S, Hanna M, God R, Krause D (2018) A model-based approach for the development of modular product families considering different life phases. In: Proceedings of the EMEA sector systems engineering conference 2018, pp 269–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Gausemeier J, Lindemann U, Reinhart G, Wiendahl H-P (2000) Kooperatives Produktenginee-ring: Ein neues Selbstverständnis des ingenieurmäßigen Wirkens. HNI, Bd. 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt N, Krause D (2016) A method for designing visualisations as product development tools. In: Marjanovic D, Storga M Pavkovic N, Bojcetic N, Skec S (eds) Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th international design conference, pp 611–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt N, Bahns T, Krause D (2014) An example of visually supported design of modular product families. In: Morini G, Tolio T (eds) Procedia CIRP design conference 2014, Elsevier, pp 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.136

  • Gebhardt N, Kruse M, Krause D (2016) Gleichteile-, Modul- und Plattformstrategie. In: Linde-mann U (ed) Handbuch Produktentwicklung. Hanser, München, pp 111–149. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446445819.006

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gilz, T (2014) PLM-integrated interdisciplinary system models in the conceptual design phase based on model-based systems engineering. Dissertation, Tech. University Kaiserslau-tern

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhlich D, Fay T-A (2021) Arbeiten mit Anforderungen: Requirements Management. In: Bender B, Gericke K (eds) Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7_8

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gräßler I (2004) Kundenindividuelle Massenproduktion: Entwicklung, Vorbereitung der Herstel-lung, Veränderungsmanagement. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18681-3

  • Greve E, Fuchs C, Hamraz B, Windheim M, Schwede L-N, Krause D (2020a) Investigating the effects of modular product structures to support design decisions in modularization projects. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering & engineering management, pp 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309820

  • Greve E, Spallek J, Kuhl J, Küchenhof J, Rennpferdt C, Krause D (2020b) Neue Trends in der methodischen Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien. In: Krause D, Hartwich TS, Renn-pferdt C (eds) Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, Forschungsergebnisse und -projekte der Jahre 2016 bis 2020. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62393-0_3

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl J, Krause D (2017) Towards an impact model of modular product structures. In: Maier A, Skec S, Kim H, Kokkolaras M, Oehmen J, Fadel G, Salustri F, VDLos M (eds) Proceedings of the 21st international conference on engineering design (ICED 17), pp 151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackl J, Krause D, Otto K, Windheim M, Moon SK, Bursac N, Lachmayer R (2020) Impact of modularity decisions on a firm’s economic objectives. J Mech Des 142:5. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044914

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna M, Schwede L-N, Krause D (2018) Model-based consistency for design for variety and modularization. In: Carlo L, Browning TR, Eppinger SD, Becerril L (eds) The 20th international DSM conference, pp 239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna M, Schwenke J, Krause D (2020) Inconsistency management for product families with many variants through a model-bases approach in modular lightweight design. In: Proceedings of the design society: design conference, pp 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.309

  • Kipp T, Blees C, Krause D (2010) Anwendung einer integrierten Methode zur Entwicklung mo-dularer Produktfamilien. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S (eds) Proceedings of the 21st symposium on design for X, pp 157–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Kößler J, Paetzold K (2017) Integration of MBSE into existing development processes—expectations and challenges. In: Maier A, Skec S, Kim H, Kokkolaras M, Oehmen J, Fadel G, Salustri F, VDLos M (eds) Proceedings of the 21st international conference on engineering design (ICED 17), pp 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause D, Gebhardt N (2018) Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien: Hohe Pro-duktvielfalt beherrschbar entwickeln. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53040-5

  • Krause D, Spallek J, Blees C, Kipp T (2018) Modulare Produktstrukturierung. In: Rieg F, Steinhilper R (eds) Handbuch Konstruktion, 2nd edn. Hanser, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446456198.025

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause D, Vietor T, Inkermann D, Hanna M, Richter T, Wortmann N (2021) Produktarchitektur. In: Bender B, Gericke K (eds) Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre. Springer, Berlin, pp 335–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57303-7_12

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Küchenhof J, Schwede L-N, Krause D (2020) Planning & tracking the changes—matrix mapping of modular product family generations. In: Mortensen NH, Hansen CT, Deininger M (eds) Proceedings of NordDesign 2020. https://doi.org/10.35199/NORDDESIGN2020.11

  • Kuhl J, Ding A, Ngo NT, Braschkat A, Fiehler J, Krause D (2021) Design of personalized devices—the tradeoff between individual value and personalization workload. Appl Sci 11:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010241

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laukotka F, Hanna M, Schwede L-N, Krause D (2020a) Lebensphasenübergreifende Nutzung Digitaler Zwillinge. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 115:101–104. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112332

  • Laukotka F, Seiler F, Krause D (2020b) MBSE als Datenbasis zur Unterstützung von Konfigura-toren und Digitalen Zwillingen modularer Produktfamilien. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S (eds) Proceedings of the 31th symposium design for X, pp 61–70. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2020.7

  • Liebel G, Marko N, Tichy M (2018) Model-based engineering in the embedded systems domain: an industrial survey on the state-of-practice. Software Syst Model 17:91–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0523-3

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Liebisch M (2014) Aspektorientierte Datenhaltung in Produktkonfiguratoren—Anforderungen, Konzepte und Realisierung, Dissertation, Friedrich Schiller University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann U (2009) Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte: Methoden flexibel und si-tuationsgerecht anwenden, 3rd edn. VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann U, Ponn J (2011) Konzeptentwicklung und Gestaltung technischer Produkte: Syste-matisch von Anforderungen zu Konzepten. VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen S, Schmidt S, Moeser G, Munker F (2014) The Karlsruhe SysKIT approach—a three-step SysML teaching approach for mechatronic students. In: Morini G, Tolio T (eds) Procedia CIRP design conference 2014. Elsevier, pp 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.136

  • Otto K, Hölttä-Otto K, Simpson TW, Krause D, Ripperda S, Moon SK (2016) Global views on modular design research: linking alternative methods to support modular product family concept development. J Mech Des 138. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033654

  • Paetzold K (2017) Product and systems engineering/CA tool chains. In: Biffl S, Lüder A, Gerhard D (eds) Multi-disciplinary engineering for cyber-physical production systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56345-9_2

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennpferdt C, Greve E, Krause D (2019) The Impact of modular product architectures in PSS design: a systematic literature review. In: Putnik GD (ed) Procedia CIRP design conference 2019. Elsevier, pp 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.197

  • Rennpferdt C, Greve E, Kuhl J, Küchenhof J, Seiler F, Krause D (2020a) Modularisierung in der industriellen Anwendung. In: Krause D, Hartwich TS, Rennpferdt C (eds) Produktentwick-lung und Konstruktionstechnik, Forschungsergebnisse und -projekte der Jahre 2016 bis 2020. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62393-0_10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rennpferdt C, Hartwich TS, Krause D (2020b) PKT—Kontinuierliche Weiterentwicklung in Forschung und Lehre. In: Krause D, Hartwich TS, Rennpferdt C (eds) Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, Forschungsergebnisse und -projekte der Jahre 2016 bis 2020. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62393-0_1

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter T, Inkermann D, Vietor T (2016) A framework for integrated product architecture design. In: Boks C, Sigurjosson J, Steinert M, Vis C, Wilvik A (eds) Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, pp 310–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel R, Jacobs G, Konrad C, Singh R, Sprehe J (2020) Managing knowledge and parameter dependencies with MBSE in textile product development processes. In: Mpofu K, Butala P (eds) Procedia CIRP design conference 2020. Elsevier, pp 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.138

  • Ripperda S, Krause D (2015) Cost prognosis of modular product structure concepts. In: Weber C, Husung S, Cascini G, CantaMessa M, Marjanovic D, Rotini F (eds) Proceedings of the 20th international conference on engineering design (ICED 15), pp 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador F (2007) Toward a product system modularity construct: literature review and re-conceptualization. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 54:219–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893996

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schwede L-N, Hanna M, Wortmann N, Krause D (2019a) Consistent modelling of the impact model of modular product structures. In: Proceedings of the design society: 22nd international conference on engineering design, pp 3601–3610. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.367

  • Schwede L-N, Seiler F, Krause D (2019b) Anknüpfung von Modularisierungsmethoden an ein Wirkmodell modularer Produktstrukturen. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S (eds) Proceedings of the 30th symposium design for X, pp 159–170. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2019.14

  • Schwede L-N, Greve E, Rennpferdt C, Hanna M, Krause D (2020a) Auswirkungen modularer Produktstrukturen bei der Bewertung von Produktstrukturkonzepten. In: Krause D, Hartwich TS, Rennpferdt C (eds) Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, Forschungsergebnisse und -projekte der Jahre 2016 bis 2020. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62393-0_4

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schwede L-N, Winter M, Lödding H, Krause D (2020b) Darstellung des Zusammenhangs von Produktarchitektur- und Produktionssystemgestaltung in SysML. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S (eds) Proceedings of the 31th symposium design for X, pp 41–50. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2020.5

  • Schwede L-N, Greve E, Krause D (2020c) Validation concept for the investigation of effects of modular product families. In: Proceedings of the design society: design conference, pp 2395–2404. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.114

  • Seiler FM, Krause D (2020) A multi-dimensional configuration algorithm for modular product architectures. In: Proceedings of the design society: design conference, pp 2405–2414. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.283

  • Seiler FM, Greve E, Krause D (2019) Development of a configure-to-order-based process for the implementation of modular product architectures: a case study. In: Proceedings of the design society: international conference on engineering design, pp 2971–2980. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.304

  • Seiler FM, Kuhl J, Krause D (2020a) A simulation-based decision support method for modular product architecture alternatives. In: Stowe H, Browning TR, Eppinger SD, Trauer J (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd international DSM conference (DSM 2020). https://doi.org/10.35199/dsm2020.9

  • Seiler FM, Hanna M, Schwede L-N, Laukotka F, Krause D (2020b) MBSE zur Unterstützung der Produktentwicklung von modularen Produktarchitekturen. In: Krause D, Hartwich TS, Renn-pferdt C (eds) Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, Forschungsergebnisse und -projekte der Jahre 2016 bis 2020. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62393-0_5

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stark R, Anderl R, Thoben K-D, Wartzack S (2020) WiGeP-Positionspapier: “Digitaler Zwil-ling”. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 115:47–50. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112311

  • Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000) A heuristic method to identify modules from a functional description of a product. Des Stud 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00003-4

  • Walden DD, Roedler GJ, Forsberg K, Hamelin RD, Shortell TM (2015) Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (2007) Looking at DFX and product maturity from the perspective of a new approach to modelling product and product development processes. In: Krause F-L (ed) Procedia CIRP design conference 2007. Springer, pp 85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilking F, Schleich B, Wartzack S (2020) MBSE along the value chain—an approach for the compensation of additional effort. In: 2020 IEEE 15th international conference of system of systems engineering, pp 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/SoSE50414.2020.9130497

  • Wyrwich C, Jacobs G, Siebrecht J, Konrad C (2020) Model-based product configuration of high variety product portfolios. In: Proceedings of the design society: design conference, pp 2435–2444. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.287fgddfsg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Krause .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krause, D., Schwede, LN., Dambietz, F.M., Hanna, M. (2022). Model-Based Systems Engineering: Discovering Potentials for Methodical Modular Product Development. In: Krause, D., Heyden, E. (eds) Design Methodology for Future Products. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78367-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78368-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)