Abstract
Technological advancements have enabled remote exams as a viable alternative to in-person proctoring. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, educational institutions relied heavily on remote operation. The sudden shift exposed the weaknesses in available proctoring solutions, as pertains to fairness, economic viability, data privacy, network issues and usability. Moreover, whether they are equal in function to physical proctoring is questionable. Based on extensive research, we establish the system requirements and design for Dr. Proctor, a non-commercial solution that addresses many of the exposed concerns about remote proctoring.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Details are out of scope of this paper and can be found hereĀ [31].
References
Celery: Distributed Task Queue. https://github.com/celery/celery
Examity Online Proctoring. https://www.examity.com/
Honorlock Proctoring. https://honorlock.com/
Kurento WebRTC media server. https://www.kurento.org/
Mettl. https://mettl.com/en-ae/
Online proctoring: Trust, transparency, and fairness. https://www.ecampusnews.com/2020/06/01/online-proctoring-trust-transparency-and-fairness/2/
OpenVidu: OpenVidu Platform main repository. https://github.com/OpenVidu/openvidu
ProctorU threatens UC Santa Barbara faculty over criticism during coronavirus crisis. https://www.thefire.org/proctoru-threatens-uc-santa-barbara-faculty-over-criticism-during-coronavirus-crisis/
Respondus Assessment Tools for Learning Systems. https://web.respondus.com/
Students express privacy and security concerns over proctoring softwareāThe Charlatan, Carletonās independent newspaper. https://charlatan.ca/2020/10/students-express-privacy-and-security-concerns-over-proctoring-software/
The Best Ways to Prevent Cheating in College - The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/04/how-to-stop-cheating-in-college/479037/
Timesketch: Collaborative forensic timeline analysis. https://github.com/google/timesketch
Atoum, Y., Chen, L., Liu, A.X., Hsu, S.D., Liu, X.: Automated online exam proctoring. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 19(7), 1609ā1624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2017.2656064, https://www.cse.msu.edu/
Based, C.: Gabor Jets. In: Encyclopedia of Biometrics, pp. 627ā627 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_334
Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F., Upcroft, B.: Simple online and realtime tracking. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), September 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2016.7533003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533003
Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.Y., Liao, H.Y.M.: YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection (2020). https://github.com/AlexeyAB/darknet
Buolamwini, J.: Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification *. Technical report (2018)
Coghlan, S., Miller, T., Paterson, J.: Good proctor or ābig brotherā? AI ethics and online exam supervision technologies (2020)
Fischer, T., Chang, H.J., Demiris, Y.: RT-GENE: Real-time eye gaze estimation in natural environments. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11214 LNCS, pp. 339ā357 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01249-6_21, www.imperial.ac.uk/PersonalRobotics
Gonzales, A.L., McCrory Calarco, J., Lynch, T.: Technology problems and student achievement gaps: a validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Commun. Res. 47(5), 750ā770 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796366
van Halem, N., van Klaveren, C., Cornelisz, I.: The effects of implementation barriers in virtually proctored examination: a randomised field experiment in Dutch higher education. High. Educ. Q. p. hequ.12275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12275, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hequ.12275
Hannun, A., et al.: Deep speech: scaling up end-to-end speech recognition (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5567
Hatzipanagos, S., Warburton, S.: Feedback as dialogue: exploring the links between formative assessment and social software in distance learning. Learn. Med. Technol. 34(1), 45ā59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759919
Li, C., et al.: Deep speaker: an end-to-end neural speaker embedding system (2017)
Migicovsky, A., Durumeric, Z., Ringenberg, J., Halderman, J.A.: Outsmarting proctors with smartwatches: a case study on wearable computing security. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol.Ā 8437, pp. 89ā96 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45472-5_7, https://jhalderm.com/papers/
Moore, R., Vitale, D., Stawinoga, N.: The Digital Divide and Educational Equity: A Look at Students with Very Limited Access to Electronic Devices at Home. ACT Research & Center for Equity in Learning (August), 14 (2018). https://www.act.org/ www.act.org/ Divide/Digital Divide 6th May/ED593163.pdf
Proctortrack: Trusted Exam IntegrityāRemote Online Proctoring (2019). https://www.proctortrack.com/
ProctorU: ProctorU - The Leading Proctoring Solution for Online Exams (2020). https://www.proctoru.com/ proctoru.com/academic-solutions
Rogers, C.: Faculty perceptions about e-cheating. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 22(2), 206ā212 (2006). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262311152
Rose, S., Engel, D., Cramer, N., Cowley, W.: Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. Text Mining: Appl. Theory 2017, 1ā20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470689646.ch1
Sakr, N., Salama, A., Tameesh, N., Osman, G.: EduPal leaves no professor behind: supporting faculty via peer-powered recommender systems (2021). https://cutt.ly/EduPal-arxiv-link
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., Philbin, J.: FaceNet: a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 07ā12 June, pp. 815ā823 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298682
Selbst, A.D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S.A., Venkatasubramanian, S., Vertesi, J.: Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In: FAT* 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 59ā68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
Yang, T.Y., Chen, Y.T., Lin, Y.Y., Chuang, Y.Y.: FSA-net: Learning fine-grained structure aggregation for head pose estimation from a single image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2019-June, pp. 1087ā1096 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00118
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Elshafey, A.E., Anany, M.R., Mohamed, A.S., Sakr, N., Aly, S.G. (2021). Dr. Proctor: A Multi-modal AI-Based Platform for Remote Proctoring inĀ Education. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12749. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78269-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78270-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)