Skip to main content
  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

The advent of robot-assisted surgery has made a major impact in the area of the foregut and esophagus. This minimally invasive approach is an invaluable tool for the progression and modernization of the field. Smaller incisions, shorter lengths of stay, and better visualization have resulted in the widespread adoption of robotic surgery of the foregut. The robotic platform has been shown to have utility in the setting of esophagectomy, transhiatal and transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) methods, and cancerous and benign cases. Moreover, robotic esophagomyotomy (Heller myotomy) has revolutionized the approach to achalasia with excellent results. Furthermore, a robotic approach to hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair, alongside of fundoplication, is now integral to a modern practice. This is becoming more widespread for anti-reflux treatment and easing the difficulty associated with revisional surgery. The current trends in robotic-assisted surgery point toward an exciting future with boundless applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli E, Espat NJ. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Am Surg. 2003;69:624–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Orringer MB. Transhiatal Esophagectomy: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(5):1432–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G, et al. Guidelines for perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2019;43(2):299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4.

  4. Boyle MJ, Franceschi D, Livingstone AS. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy: complication and survival rates. Am Surg. 1999;65(12):1137–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansson J, DeMeester TR, Hagen JA, et al. En bloc vs transhiatal esophagectomy for stage T3 N1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Arch Surg. 2004;139(6):627–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.6.627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):549–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318188c474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, et al. Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1020–30. discussion 1029–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonavina L, Nosadini A, Bardini R, Baessato M, Peracchia A. Primary treatment of esophageal achalasia. Long-term results of myotomy and dor fundoplication. Arch Surg. 1992;127:222–6. discussion 227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Farrell T, Kohn G, Augenstein V, Fanelli R. Guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. SAGES; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, Brunt ML, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Polissar NL, Neradilek MB, Mitsumori LM, Rohrmann CA, Swanstrom LL. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic Paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Armijo PR, Pokala B, Misfeldt M, Pagkratis S, Oleynikov D. Predictors of hiatal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with hiatal hernia repair: a prospective database analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(4):696–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-04073-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greene CL, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Worrell SG, Oh DS, Hagen JA, Endosc S. Diaphragmatic relaxing incisions during laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. 2013;27(12):4532–8. Published online 2013 Aug 16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Broderick RC, Smith CD, Cheverie JN, et al. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: a viable rescue therapy for symptomatic reflux following bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(7):3211–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07096-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Wu P, Shah S, Bildzukewicz N, Lipham JC. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation vs laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a matched-pair analysis of 100 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(1):123–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. LINX® Reflux Management System Surgical Procedure. JNJ Institute. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Other References

  • JC DL, Kelly KJ, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Horgan S, Bouvet M. The benefits and limitations of robotic assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Vis Surg. 2016;2:156. Published 2016 Sep 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Zifan A, Ghahremani G, Kunkel DC, Horgan S, Mittal RK. Morphology of the esophageal hiatus: is it different in 3 types of hiatus hernias? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;26(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm18208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland V, Kuwada T, Gersin K, Simms C, Stefanidis D. Impact of bariatric surgery on hiatal hernia repair outcomes. Am Surg. 2016;82(8):743–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Straus, D.J. (2021). Robotic Esophageal Surgery. In: Horgan, S., Fuchs, KH. (eds) Innovative Endoscopic and Surgical Technology in the GI Tract . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78217-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78217-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78216-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78217-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics