Skip to main content

Abstract

The advent of minimally invasive surgery was characterized by a massive switch of the majority of surgeons from open cholecystectomy to the laparoscopic technique, often pushed by the patients, who required this less invasive approach. Single-port access was introduced during the phase of exploring natural orifice surgery. The obvious advantage was the reduction of access trocars; however, the procedure through the limited “single” port was quite cumbersome because of the nature of the technique. The popularity of single-port surgery and cholecystectomy decreased in the past 5–10 years again. A new platform for this technique is the Fortimedix Surgical SymphonX™ system with a diameter of only 15 mm. This system allows for the introduction of a camera and of two non-crossing, articulating instruments, which create a comfortable working platform with space to manipulate instruments and tissue, incorporating features comparable to robotic surgery. SymphonX™ carries the ability to perform a laparoscopic procedure such as a cholecystectomy without an additional trocar. Clinical studies show promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perissat J, Collet D, Belliard R, Sosso M. Laparoscopic treatment for gallbladder stones and the place of intracorporeal lithotripsy. Surg Endosc. 1990;4(3):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Périssat J. Laparoscopic surgery: a pioneer's point of view. World J Surg. 1999;23(8):863–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80397-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan RH, Lee WJ, Yu SC. Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cosmetically better, almost scarless procedure. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1997;7(4):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1997.7.205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reardon PR, Kamelgard JI, Applebaum B, Rossman L, Brunicardi FC. Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases. World J Surg. 1999;23(2):128–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00013163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg. 2003;90(11):1345–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M. Marescaux J; Transgastric hybrid cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2009 Oct;96(10):1162–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P, Donatelli G, Asakuma M, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Transgastric cholecystectomy: from the laboratory to clinical impleention. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2(6):187–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs KH, Meining A, von Renteln D, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Breithaupt W, Zornig C, Lacy A. Euro-NOTES status paper: from the concept to clinical practice. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1456–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C. Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2009;41:391–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmüller C, Mofid H. NOTES cholecystectomy: matched pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(6):1822–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arezzo A, Zornig C, Mofid H, Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Noguera J, Kaehler G, Magdeburg R, Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J, Copaescu C, Graur F, Szasz A, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Buess G, Bhattacharjee HK, Navarra G, Godina M, Shishin K, Morino M. The EURO-NOTES clinical registry for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a 2-year activity report. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3073–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Linden YT, Bosscha K, Prins HA, Lips DJ. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a non-randomized, age-matched single center trial. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7(8):145–51. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v7.i8.145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Allemann P, Demartines N, Schäfer M. Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(3):843–51. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.843.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tranchart H, Ketoff S, Lainas P, et al. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for what benefit? HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(6):433–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00612.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haber GP, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):415–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(6):1037–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haueter R, Schütz T, Raptis DA, Clavien PA, Zuber M. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis. Br J Surg. 2017;104(9):1141–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1419–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0463-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner MJ, Kern H, Hapfelmeier A, Mehler J, Schoenberg MH. Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):991–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1946-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3437–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5381-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arezzo A, Passera R, Forcignanò E, Rapetti L, Cirocchi R, Morino M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3739–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6143-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee Y, Roh Y, Kim M, et al. Analysis of post-operative complication in single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis in 817 cases from a surgeon. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(4):311–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_168_17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lurje G, Raptis DA, Steinemann DC, et al. Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). Ann Surg. 2015;262(5):728–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Escobar PF, Haber GP, Kaouk J, Kroh M, Chalikonda S, Falcone T. Single-port surgery: laboratory experience with the daVinci single-site platform. JSLS. 2011;15(2):136–41. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13022985132128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(11):3566–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1759-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Broderick RC, Omelanczuk P, Harnsberger CR, Fuchs HF, Berducci M, Nefa J, Nicolia J, Almadani M, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Horgan S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel single-incision surgical platform through a standard 15 mm trocar: initial experience and technical details. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(5):1250–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3779-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berducci M, Fuchs HF, Omelanczuk P, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, Langert J, Nefa J, Jaureguiberry P, Gomez P, Miranda L, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Horgan S. Phase II clinical experience and long-term follow-up using the next-generation single-incision platform FMX314. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):953–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4319-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Datta RR, Dieplinger G, Wahba R, et al. True single-port cholecystectomy with ICG cholangiography through a single 15-mm trocar using the new surgical platform "symphonX": first human case study with a commercially available device. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(6):2722–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07229-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Cuesta MA, Sietses C. Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee L, Mappin-Kasirer B, Sender Liberman A, Stein B, Charlebois P, Vassiliu M, Fried GM, Feldmann LS. High incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline extraction in laparoscopic colon resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3180–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luna RA, Nogueira DB, Varela PS, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1254–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2589-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng H, Chen BP, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P. Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review. Surg Infect. 2017;18(6):722–35. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2017.089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Buckley FP 3rd, Vassaur HE, Jupiter DC, Crosby JH, Wheeless CJ, Vassaur JL. Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy. Hernia. 2016;20(5):729–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1512-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boogerd LSF, Handgraaf HJM, Huurman VAL, et al. The best approach for laparoscopic fluorescence cholangiography: overview of the literature and optimization of dose and dosing time. Surg Innov. 2017;24(4):386–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350617702311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Friedrich Fuchs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, H.F., Datta, R.R., Stippel, D.L., Bruns, C.J. (2021). New Single-Site Platforms. In: Horgan, S., Fuchs, KH. (eds) Innovative Endoscopic and Surgical Technology in the GI Tract . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78217-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78217-7_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78216-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78217-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics