Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory pp 367–380Cite as

Law in Classical Sociological Theory: Coercion, Ideology, and Change

  • 662 Accesses

Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

This chapter examines the law-related writings of Marx, Durkheim, and Weber through the three common themes of coercion, ideology, and change, which correspond to the behavioral, normative, and temporal aspects of law as an object of sociological inquiry. Each theorist situates the three themes differently in their broader conceptual frameworks, privileging one of these aspects over the others. For Durkheim, law is an instance of social solidarity. For Weber, law is a legitimate form of domination or what he calls rational-legal authority. And, for Marx, law is a superstructure controlled by the ruling class that changes according to the economic base. Despite these differences, each author has made fundamental contributions to each of these three aspects of law. The chapter provides a common vocabulary and a set of comparable themes from classical theory to facilitate conversations about law across different sociological traditions.

Keywords

  • Law
  • Coercion
  • Ideology
  • Change

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_16
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-78205-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. 2016. Processual sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. 2016. Considerations on Western Marxism. London, UK: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbus, I.D. 1977. Commodity form and legal form: an essay on the “relative autonomy” of the law. Law & Society Review 11 (3): 571–588. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053132.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169–217.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, K., and S. Herbert. 2010. Penal boundaries: banishment and the expansion of punishment. Law & Social Inquiry 35 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01176.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berrey, E., R.L. Nelson, and L.B. Nielsen. 2017. Rights on trial: how workplace discrimination law perpetuates inequality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1987. The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal 38 (5): 814–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. 2009. The culture of punishment: prison, society, and spectacle. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M.E., and A. Hunt. 1979. Marx and Engels on law. London, UK: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W.J. 1964. A sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy. Social Problems 12 (1): 67–77.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. On lawmaking. British Journal of Law and Society 6 (2): 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409765.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, L.J., and D.M. Engel. 2019. Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15 (1): 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. 1984. Marxism and law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coutu, M. 2018. Max Weber’s interpretive sociology of law. London, UK: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. 1995. The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology 100 (5): 1157–1198. https://doi.org/10.1086/230635.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. 1957. Professional ethics and civic morals. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. The division of labor in society. Trans. G. Simpson. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Suicide: a study in sociology. New York, NY: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. 1989. The origin of family, private property, and state. In The Marx-Engels reader, ed. R.C. Tucker, 734–759. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, P., and S.S. Silbey. 1998. The common place of law: stories from everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L.L. 1969. The morality of law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. 1990. Punishment and modern society: a study in social theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, M. 2006. The prison and the gallows: the politics of mass incarceration in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York, NY: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T.C., and B.G. Carruthers. 2007. The recursivity of law: Global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112 (4): 1135–1202.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A. 1985. The ideology of law: advances and problems in recent applications of the concept of ideology to the analysis of law. Law & Society Review 19 (1): 11–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053393.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E.M. 1972. Human deviance, social problems, and social control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. 2015. Law’s social forms: a powerless approach to the sociology of law. Law & Social Inquiry 40 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Law as a social system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. 1972. History and class consciousness: studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1978. Capital: a critique of political economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989a. Capital. In The Marx-Engels reader, ed. R.C. Tucker, vol. 1, 294–438. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989b. The German ideology: part I. In The Marx-Engels reader, ed. R.C. Tucker, 146–200. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, M.W. 1994. Rights at work: pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S.E. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Bempah, A. 2017. Race and policing in historical context: dehumanization and the policing of Black people in the 21st century. Theoretical Criminology 21 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616677493.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology 108 (5): 937–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/374403.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pashukanis, E. 1980. The general theory of law and Marxism. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The general theory of law and Marxism. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G.N. 1994. The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusche, G. 1978. Labor market and penal sanction: thoughts on the sociology of criminal justice. Social Justice 40 (10): 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusche, G., and O. Kirchheimer. 1939. Punishment and social structure. New York, NY: Columbia university press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scheingold, S.A. 1984. The politics of law and order: street crime and public policy. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W.H., Jr. 1996. Three temporalities: toward an eventful sociology. In The historic turn in the human sciences, ed. T.J. McDonald, 245–280. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiff, T. 2020. Reconfiguring the deserving refugee: cultural categories of worth and the making of refugee policy. Law & Society Review 54 (1): 102–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12456.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Silbey, S.S. 2005. After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 (1): 323–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I., J. Young, and P. Walton. 1973. The new criminology: for a social theory of deviance. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D.M. 1972. Max Weber on law and the rise of capitalism. Wisconsin Law Review 720: 720–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Where the action is: critical legal studies and empiricism. Stanford Law Review 36 (1/2): 575–622. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228692.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D.M., and M. Galanter. 1974. Scholars in self-estrangement: some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review 1974 (4): 1062–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D.M., and A. Santos. 2006. Introduction: the third moment in law and development theory and the emergence of a new critical practice. In The New law and economic development, ed. D.M. Trubek and A. Santos, 1–18. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754425.001.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. 1988. What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review 22 (1): 103–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R., and R.J. Boeckmann. 1997. Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review 31 (2): 237–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053926.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. 2012. Everyday law on the street: city governance in an age of diversity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Chronotopes of law: Jurisdiction, scale and governance. London, UK: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1954. Max Weber on law in economy and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1958. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. IV. Politics as a Vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, ed. H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills, 77–128. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, J.Q. 2003. Harsh justice: criminal punishment and the widening divide between America and Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Eduardo Cornelius & Sida Liu

Authors
  1. Eduardo Cornelius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sida Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sida Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Seth Abrutyn

  2. UCLA Department of Sociology, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Omar Lizardo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cornelius, E., Liu, S. (2021). Law in Classical Sociological Theory: Coercion, Ideology, and Change. In: Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (eds) Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78204-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78205-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)