Skip to main content

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) is defined as when two or more professions learn from, with and about each other to improve collaboration and the quality of care. Curriculum development in IPE is complex as it typically involves faculty and students from several departments, institutions or even universities. However, the principles of curriculum development are similar. This chapter includes definitions of terms, the rationale for and educational theories underpinning IPE, interprofessional learning outcomes, activities and assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Keating SB. Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2011a.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CAIPE. CAIPE re-issues its statement on the definition and principles of interprofessional education. CAIPE Bulletin. 2006;26:3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(1):8–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thistlethwaite JE, Kumar K, Roberts C. Becoming interprofessional: professional identity formation in the health professions. In: Cruess R, Cruess S, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Medicine; 2016. p. 140–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Keating SB. The components of the curriculum. In: Keating SB, editor. Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2011b. p. 185–228.

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Learning together to work together. Geneva: WHO; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeth D, Savin-Baden M, Thistlethwaite JE. Interprofessional education. In: Swanwick T, O’Brien B, Forrest K, editors. Understanding medical education. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2018. p. 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training. WHO Education Guidelines 2013. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thistlethwaite JE. Research and evaluation: the present and the future. In: Forman D, Jones M, Thistlethwaite JE, editors. Leading research and evaluation in interprofessional education and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. p. 355–68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brashers V, Phillips E, Malpass J, Owen J. Appendix A review: measuring the Impact of Interprofessional Education (IPE) on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. In: Institute of Medicine, editor. Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. p. 67–133.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD002213. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reeves S, Palaganas J, Zierler B. An updated synthesis of review evidence of interprofessional education. J Allied Health. 2017;46(1):56–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riskiyana R, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Objectively measured interprofessional education outcome and factors that enhance program effectiveness: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;66:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee A, Steketee C, Rogers G, Moran M. Towards a theoretical framework for curriculum development in health professional education. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2013;14(3):70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (CIHC). A national interprofessional competency framework. 2010. http://ipcontherun.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/National-Framework.pdf. Accessed 08 Jan 2021.

  18. Curtin University. Interprofessional capability framework, 2013. 2013. https://healthsciences.curtin.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2017/11/interprofessional_A5_broch_1-29072015.pdf. Accessed 08 Jan 2021.

  19. Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thistlethwaite JE, Moran M. Learning outcomes for interprofessional education (IPE): literature review and synthesis. J Interprof Care. 2010;24:503–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Biggs JB, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Open University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bainbridge L, Wood VI. The power of prepositions: a taxonomy for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:131–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reeves S, Hean S. Why we need theory to help us better understand the nature of interprofessional education, practice and care. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Craddock D, O’Halloran C, McPherson K, Hean S, Hammick M. A top-down approach impedes the use of theory? Interprofessional educational leaders’ approaches to curriculum development and the use of learning theory. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hean S, Craddock D, Hammick M. Theoretical insights into interprofessional education: AMEE Guide No. 62. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e78–e101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hean S, Craddock D, O’Halloran C. Learning theories and interprofessional education: a user’s guide. Learn Health Soc Care. 2009;8(4):250–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor DCM, Hamdy H. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Buckley H, Steinert Y, Regehr G, Nimmon L. When I say…community of practice. Med Educ. 2019;53:763–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ajjawi R, Brander R, Thistlethwaite JE. Interprofessional programs to develop clinical reasoning. In: Higgs J, Jensen GM, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2019. p. 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  31. O’Donnell J, Hafferty F, editors. The hidden curriculum in health professions education. Dartmouth: Dartmouth College Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Orrell J. Good practice report: work-integrated learning. Surry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thistlethwaite JE. Assessment of interprofessional teamwork—an international perspective. In: Forman D, Jones M, Thistlethwaite JE, editors. Leadership and collaboration. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2015. p. 35–152.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haidet P, Levine RWE, Parmelee DX, Crow S, Kennedy F, Kelly PA, et al. Perspective: guidelines for reporting team-based learning activities in the medical and health sciences education literature. Acad Med. 2012;87:292–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34:e421–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Srinivasan M, Wilkes M, Stevenson F, Nguyen T, Slavin S. Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift in two institutions. Acad Med. 2007;82:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Packard K, Chelal H, Maio A, et al. Interprofessional team reasoning framework as a tool for case study analysis with health professions students: a randomized study. J Res Interprof Pract Educ. 2012;2(3):250–63.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Palaganas JC, Epps C, Raemer DP. A history of simulation-enhanced interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(2):110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Granheim BM, Shaw JM, Mansah M. The use of interprofessional learning and simulation in undergraduate nursing programs to address interprofessional communication and collaboration: an integrative review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;62:118–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jones IF. The theory of boundaries; Impact on interprofessional working. J Interprof Care. 2007;21(3):355–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thistlethwaite JE, Bartle E, Chong AL, et al. A review of longitudinal community and hospital placements in medical education: BEME Guide No. 26. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):e1340–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kent F, Glass S, Courtney J, Thorpe J, Nisbet G. Sustainable interprofessional learning in clinical placements: the value of observing others at work. J Interprof Care. 2020;3:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lidskog M, Löfmark Z, Ahlström G. Learning about each other: students’ conceptions before and after interprofessional education on a training ward. J Interprof Care. 2008;22(5):521–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Haines TP, Kent F, Keating JL. Interprofessional student clinics: an economic evaluation of collaborative clinical placement education. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(4):292–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Moran M, Boyce AR, Nissen L. Competition the new collaboration? Employing inter-team competitiveness to motivate health students to learn together. In: Kitto S, Chesters J, Thistlethwaite JE, Reeves S, editors. Sociology of Interprofessional Health Care practice. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2011. p. 155–68.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Luke R, Solomon P, Baptiste S, Hall P, Orchard C, Ruckholm E, Carter L. Online interprofessional health sciences education: from theory to practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29(3):161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rogers G, Thistlethwaite JE, Anderson ES, Dahlgren MA, Grymonpre RE, Moran M, et al. International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes. Med Teach. 2016;39(4):347–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Boud D. Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clin Teach. 2015;12:3–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oakley B, Felder RM, Brent R, Elhajj I. Turning student groups into effective teams. J Stud Center Learn. 2004;2:9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  50. McMaster University. McMaster/Ottawa TOSCE toolkit. n.d. https://fhs.mcmaster.ca/tosce/en/index.html. Accessed 8 Jan 2021.

  51. Simmons B, Egan-Lee E, Wagner SJ, Esdaile M, Baker L, Reeves S. Assessment of interprofessional learning: the design of an interprofessional objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) approach. J Interprof Care. 2011;25:73–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Med Educ. 2012;46:8–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Domac S, Anderson E, O’Reilly M, Smith R. Assessing interprofessional competence using a prospective reflective portfolio. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(3):179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lawlis TR, Anson J, Greenfield D. Barriers and enablers that influence sustainable interprofessional education: a literature review. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(4):305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill E. Thistlethwaite .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thistlethwaite, J.E. (2021). Curriculum Development in Interprofessional Education in Health. In: Darmann-Finck, I., Reiber, K. (eds) Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Curricula in Nursing and Midwifery Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78181-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78181-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78180-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78181-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics