Skip to main content

Ontological Categories for Geo-Ontologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Geo-Ontologies

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

Abstract

Despite their recent development (see Chap. 6), geo-ontologies still represent a complicated conundrum for most experts involved in their design. IT/computer scientists use ontologies for describing the meaning of data and their semantics to make information resources built for humans also understandable for artificial agents (see Chap. 2). Geographers pursue conceptualizations that describe the (geographical) domain of interest in a way that should be accessible, informative, and exhaustive for their final recipients (see Chaps. 2 and 6). In this context, philosophers/ontologists should offer conceptual solutions for carving nature at the joints and choosing how to categorize all the entities belonging to the geographical domain. This chapter aims to combine assumptions and requirements coming from these different areas of research, in order to show what categories might complete the current domain of geo-ontologies. The issue is approached by thinking of such a domain as a whole, composed of two different levels of categorization. The first level concerns the IT components shared among different ontologies. The second level deals with contents, for which (philosophical and) geographical analysis can include categories that do not appear at the first level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chaps. 12 and 6.

  2. 2.

    See Chap. 2. For an analysis on the “multifaceted nature” of the relationship between ontology and geography, see Chap. 1, Sect. 1.3.

  3. 3.

    See Chap. 2.

  4. 4.

    See Chap. 1.

  5. 5.

    See Chap. 2.

  6. 6.

    However, Lowe himself also acknowledges that there are aspects of common sense that need to be revised or abandoned.

  7. 7.

    See for example Smith (1997).

  8. 8.

    For a deep investigation on the notion of completeness in IT/computer ontology, see Bittner and Smith (2008).

  9. 9.

    See Sect. 7.3.

  10. 10.

    The same reasoning can be easily extended to the other core components.

References

  • Bishr YA, Kuhn W (2000) Ontology-based modelling of geospatial information. In: Ostman A, Gould M, Sarjakoski T (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd AGILE conference on geographic information science, Helsinki, pp 24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner T, Smith B (2008) A theory of granular partitions. In: Munn K, Smith B (eds) Applied ontology. An introduction. Ontos-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst WN (1997) Construction of engineering ontologies, centre for telematica and information technology. University of Twente, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccella A, Perez L, Cechich A (2008) GeoMergeP: supporting an ontological approach to geographic information integration. In International Conference of the Chilean computer science society. http://disi.unitn.it/*p2p/RelatedWork/Matching/bucc-perbel-cech08p.pdf

  • Cumpa J (2014) A materialist criterion of fundamentality. Am Philos Q 51(4):319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumpa J (2018) Factualism and the scientific image. Int J Philos Stud 26(5):669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumpa J (2019) Structure and completeness: a defense of factualism in categorial ontology. Acta Analytica 34(2):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M (1981) Frege: philosophy of language. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M, Mark DM (1995) Naive geography. In: Frank AU, Kuhn E (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Proceedings of the second international conference. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege G (1884) Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Koebner, Breslau

    Google Scholar 

  • Geus K, Thiering M (2014) Common sense geography and mental modelling: Setting the stage. In: Geus K, Thiering M (eds) Features of common sense geography. Implicit knowledge structures in ancient geographical texts. LIT, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Goy A, Magro D (2015) What are ontologies useful for? Encyclopedia of information science and technology. IGI Global, pp 7456–7464

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann R (1983) The categorial structure of the world. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5(2):199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N, Giaretta P (1995) Ontologies and knowledge bases—towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars NJ (ed) Towards very large knowledge bases—knowledge building and knowledge sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann N (1949) Der Aufbau der realen Welt: Grundriß der allgemeinen Kategorienlehre. Anton Hain, Meisenheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil J (2012) The world as we find it. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaziri W, Gargouri F (2010) Ontology theory, management and design: an overview and future directions. In: Gargouri F, Jaziri W (eds) Ontology theory, management and design: advanced tools and models. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W (2001) Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7):613–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurini R (2017) Geographic knowledge infrastructure: applications to territorial intelligence and smart cities. ISTE-Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord P (2010) Components of an Ontology. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/514

  • Lowe EJ (2006) The four-category ontology: a metaphysical foundation for natural science. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1976) On defining ‘ontology.’ Metaphilosophy 7:102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy NF, McGuinness DL (2003) Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pâslaru-Bontaş E (2007). A contextual approach to ontology reuse. Methodology, methods and tools for the semantic web. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freien Universitat, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Runggaldier E, Kanzian C (1998) Grundprobleme der analytischen Ontologie. Verlag, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. Hutchinson’s University Library, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1997) On substance, accidents and universals: in defence of a constituent ontology. Philos Pap 27:105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Mark DM (2001) Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7):591–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers F (1963) Types and ontology. Philos Rev 72:327–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers F (1971) Structural ontology. Philosophia 1:21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. IEEE Trans Data Knowl Eng 25(1–2):161–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambassi T (2018) The riddle of reality. In: Tambassi T (ed) Studies in the ontology of E.J. Lowe. Editiones Scholasticae, Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambassi T, Magro D (2015) Ontologie informatiche della geografia. Una sistematizzazione del dibattito contemporaneo. Rivista Di Estetica 58:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff J (2005) Ontological categories. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Tambassi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tambassi, T. (2021). Ontological Categories for Geo-Ontologies. In: The Philosophy of Geo-Ontologies . SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78145-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics