Skip to main content

Spatial Representation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Geo-Ontologies

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

  • 273 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 argued that the main goals of ontology of geography includes developing a formal theory of spatial representation, with special reference to geographical phenomena. This chapter undertakes to offer an introduction to the theoretical tools needed for advancing such a formal theory. First, we show that the list of tools can include mereology and topology as well as the geo-ontological distinction between classical and non-classical geographies. Second, following Casati et al. (1998), we argue that classical geography describes a robust way of tiling regions in the presence of three general axioms: (1) Every single geographic entity is located at some unique spatial region. (2) Every spatial region has a unique geographic entity located at it. (3) If two entities are located are at the same spatial region, then they are the same entity. Third, we maintain that any geography can be considered as non-classical if it drops and/or adds axioms to those of classical geography. Finally, we showcase some possible issues emerging from the application of the distinction between classical and non-classical geographies to the cartographic representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an analysis of the connection between mereology and topology and of the notion of mereotopology, see Smith (1995), Breysse and De Glas (2007). For an analysis of the relation between the notions of topology and border, see Casati et al. (1998), Smith and Varzi (2000), Varzi (2007).

  2. 2.

    Among the most significant works that investigate the notion of “classical geography” in a strict geographical sense and analyze its relations with the concepts of spatial location and representation, see Lukermann (1961), Geus and Thiering (2014).

  3. 3.

    Cfr. Chap. 5.

  4. 4.

    Accordingly, Italy might also consider Kosovo as a non-spatial geographical entity, at least in this specific context.

  5. 5.

    To be more precise, the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is a non-UN member state recognized only by a few UN member states; the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic is a non-UN member state recognized only by non-UN member states; the Republic of Somaliland is a non-UN member state not recognized by any state.

References

  • Breysse O, De Glas M (2007) A new approach to the concepts of boundary and contact: toward an alternative to mereotopology. Fundam Inform 78:217–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati R, Smith B, Varzi AC (1998) Ontological tools for geographic representation. In: Guarino N (ed) Formal ontology in information systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati R, Varzi AC (1999) Parts and places. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Geus K, Thiering M (2014) Common sense geography and mental modelling: setting the stage. In: Geus K, Thiering M (eds) Features of common sense geography. Implicit knowledge structures in ancient geographical texts. LIT, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Smith B, Tversky B (1999) Ontology and geographic objects: an empirical study of cognitive categorization. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Proceedings of spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. International conference COSIT’99 stade, Germany, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons P (1987) Parts: an essay in ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1994) Fiat objects. In: Guarino N, Pribbenow S, Vieu L (eds) Parts and wholes: conceptual part-whole relations and formal mereology. Proceedings of the ECAI94 workshop, ECCAI, Amsterdam, pp 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1995) On drawing lines on a map. In: Frank A, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory—a theoretical basis for GIS. Proceedings, international conference Cosit’95, semmering, Austria (Lecture notes in computer science), vol 988. Springer, Berlin, pp 475–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1996) Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Knowl Eng 20:287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Mark DM (1998) Ontology and geographic kinds. In: Poiker TK, Chrisman N (eds) Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on spatial data handling. International Geo- graphical Union, Burnaby, British Columbia, pp 308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Mark DM (2001) Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7), 591–612. http://idwebhost-202-147.ethz.ch/Courses/geog231/SmithMark_GeographicalCategories_IJGIS2001@2005-10-19T07%3B30%3B52.pdf

  • Smith B, Varzi AC (2000) Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philos Phenomenol Res 60(2):401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varzi AC (2007) Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes and location. In: Aiello M, Pratt- Hartmann I, van Benthem J (eds) Handbook of spatial logics. Springer, Berlin, pp 945–1038

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Tambassi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tambassi, T. (2021). Spatial Representation. In: The Philosophy of Geo-Ontologies . SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78145-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics