Skip to main content

Oil and Gas Reservoirs Parameters Analysis Using Mixed Learning of Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science – ICCS 2021 (ICCS 2021)

Abstract

In this paper, a multipurpose Bayesian-based method for data analysis, causal inference and prediction in the sphere of oil and gas reservoir development is considered. This allows analysing parameters of a reservoir, discovery dependencies among parameters (including cause and effects relations), checking for anomalies, prediction of expected values of missing parameters, looking for the closest analogues, and much more. The method is based on extended algorithm MixLearn@BN for structural learning of Bayesian networks. Key ideas of MixLearn@BN are following: (1) learning the network structure on homogeneous data subsets, (2) assigning a part of the structure by an expert, and (3) learning the distribution parameters on mixed data (discrete and continuous). Homogeneous data subsets are identified as various groups of reservoirs with similar features (analogues), where similarity measure may be based on several types of distances. The aim of the described technique of Bayesian network learning is to improve the quality of predictions and causal inference on such networks. Experimental studies prove that the suggested method gives a significant advantage in missing values prediction and anomalies detection accuracy. Moreover, the method was applied to the database of more than a thousand petroleum reservoirs across the globe and allowed to discover novel insights in geological parameters relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andriushchenko, P., Deeva, I., Kalyuzhnaya, A., Bubnova, A., Voskresenskiy, A., Bukhanov, N.: Analysis of parameters of oil and gas fields using Bayesian networks. In: Data Science in Oil & Gas, vol. 2020, pp. 1–10. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chickering, D.M.: Optimal structure identification with greedy search. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(Nov), 507–554 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, K., et al.: 2013 The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. episodes 36, pp. 199–204. Episodes 36 (Sept 2013). https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2013/v36i3/002

  4. Cooper, G.F., Herskovits, E.: A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Mach. Learn. 9(4), 309–347 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. De Jager, G.: The influence of geological data on the reservoir modelling and history matching process (2012). https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:b06f57c2-24b5-407b-a69c-e68c8bd7ff01

  6. Gallagher, K., Charvin, K., Nielsen, S., Sambridge, M., Stephenson, J.: Markov chain monte carlo (MCMC) sampling methods to determine optimal models, model resolution and model choice for earth science problems. Mar. Pet. Geol. 26(4), 525–535 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gámez, J.A., Mateo, J.L., Puerta, J.M.: Learning Bayesian networks by hill climbing: efficient methods based on progressive restriction of the neighborhood. Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 22(1), 106–148 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gower, J.C.: A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27, 857–871 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han, S., Li, M., Zhang, Q., Li, H.: A mathematical model based on Bayesian theory and Gaussian copula for the discrimination of gabbroic rocks from three tectonic settings. J. Geol. 127(6), 611–626 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henrion, M.: Propagating uncertainty in Bayesian networks by probabilistic logic sampling. In: Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition, vol. 5, pp. 149–163. Elsevier (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hernández-Maldonado, V., Díaz-Viera, M., Erdely, A.: A multivariate Bernstein copula model for permeability stochastic simulation. Geofísica Int. 53(2), 163–181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Y., Deutsch, C.V.: Implementation of the iterative proportion fitting algorithm for geostatistical facies modeling. Nat. Resour. Res. 21(2), 221–231 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinelli, G., Eidsvik, J., Sinding-Larsen, R., Rekstad, S., Mukerji, T.: Building Bayesian networks from basin-modelling scenarios for improved geological decision making. Pet. Geosci. 19(3), 289–304 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Masoudi, P., Asgarinezhad, Y., Tokhmechi, B.: Feature selection for reservoir characterisation by Bayesian network. Arab. J. Geosci. 8(5), 3031–3043 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perez-Valiente, M., Rodriguez, H., Santos, C., Vieira, M., Embid, S.: Identification of reservoir analogues in the presence of uncertainty. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Intelligent Energy International 2014 (Apr 2014). https://doi.org/10.2118/167811-MS

  17. Robinson, R.W.: Counting labeled acyclic digraphs. New directions in the theory of graphs, pp. 239–273 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scutari, M., Graafland, C.E., Gutiérrez, J.M.: Who learns better Bayesian network structures: accuracy and speed of structure learning algorithms. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 115, 235–253 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, S.Q., Wan, J.: Geological analogs usage rates high in global survey. Oil Gas J. 100, 49–50 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Voskresenskiy, A., Bukhanov, N., Filippova, Z., Brandao, R., Segura, V., Brazil, E.: Feature selection for reservoir analogues similarity ranking as model-based causal inference (Sept 2020). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202035170

  21. Voskresenskiy, A., et al.: Variations in ranked list of reservoir analogs as an effect of search preferences 2020(1), 1–5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202053163. https://www.earthdoc.org/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202053163

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Gazprom Neft for the provided reservoir dataset. This research is partially financially supported by The Russian Scientific Foundation, Agreement №19-11-00326. Participation in the ICCS conference was supported by the NWO Science Diplomacy Fund project №483.20.038 “Russian-Dutch Collaboration in Computational Science”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Deeva, I. et al. (2021). Oil and Gas Reservoirs Parameters Analysis Using Mixed Learning of Bayesian Networks. In: Paszynski, M., Kranzlmüller, D., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2021. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12742. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77961-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77961-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77960-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77961-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics