Skip to main content

Concept Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurial Vision

Part of the book series: Classroom Companion: Business ((CCB))

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus on concept testing. It is important to invest adequate time in concept testing to discover the most important attributes/benefits to craft into the “minimum viable product” (MVP) for later development and testing with your first niche market of focus. As such, our learning objectives in this chapter are to:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, J. N. (1964). Reducing advertising failures by concept testing. Journal of Marketing, 28(4), 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1979). The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1993). Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (2nd ed.). Perseus Books Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (1998). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore sanity. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G. (2001). Winning at new products: Accelerating the launch from idea to launch. Basic Books (Hachette Books Group, Inc.), 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., & Reimann, R. M. (2002). About face 2.0. Morgan Kaufmann (Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2021). New products management (12th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary.com. (2020). Definition for the word “concept”. Accessed on 24th Oct 2020, from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/concept

  • Dolan, R. J., & Matthews, J. M. (1993). Maximizing the utility of customer product testing: Beta test design and management. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Go, K., & Carroll, J. M. (2004). Scenario-based task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 117–134). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, M. (2014). Persona template: For user-centered design process, Open Law Lab blog by Margaret Hagan. Accessed on 15 Nov 2020 from https://www.openlawlab.com/2014/09/19/persona-template-user-centered-design-process/

  • Iuso, B. (1975). Concept testing: An appropriate approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(2), 228–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R., & Athaide, G. A. (2010). Consumer innovativeness and the use of new versus extended brand names for new products. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, G., & Wright, M. (2004). The effect of concept formulation on concept test scores. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(6), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies, 32(5), 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, M. (2010). The moderating roles of prior experience and behavioral importance in the predictive validity of new product concept testing. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. L., & Rosenbaum, H. F. (1992). Developing an effective concept-testing program for consumer durables. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(4), 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, L., & Finn, A. (2010). How cloudy a crystal ball: A psychometric assessment of concept testing. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 238–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2006). The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Morgan Kaufmann (Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, P. E., & Grimes, S. (1984). How concept knowledge affects concept evaluation. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(4), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations (2nd ed.). The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoormans, J. P. L., Ortt, R. J., & de Bont, C. J. P. M. (1995). Enhancing concept test validity by using expert consumers. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(2), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, E. M. (1972). What is measured by concept testing? Journal of Advertising Research, 12(6), 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, Y. (1973). A new procedure for concept evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan E. Reid .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reid, S.E., Crawford, C.B. (2022). Concept Testing. In: Entrepreneurial Vision. Classroom Companion: Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77803-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics