Skip to main content

Animals in Environmental Sociology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Environmental Sociology

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

It is well established that nonhuman animals have substantial social significance in human society (Arluke & Sanders, 1996; Irvine, 2008; Nibert, 2013). However, some aspects of sociological investigation have not fully engaged with the question of how animals are embedded in human social systems. Wilkie (2015) calls for a reimagining of C. Wright Mills’ sociological imagination into an “animalizing of the sociological imagination” to recognize that animals are an integral part of human social systems and how we treat and engage with animals impacts human social life. It is curious that animals often are invisible in environmental sociology, a subdiscipline constructed in opposition to human exceptionalism (Tovey, 2003). When animals do appear, they are considered primarily as part of ecological systems or “wild nature,” with the billions who exist as food, domestic or service animals largely ignored (Tovey, 2003). Yet, it is clear that humans and other animals live in co-constituted, collaborative worlds (Despret, 2013; Haraway, 2008; Porcher, 2017). Indeed, animals are so embedded into the social fabric that society cannot be fully understood without including them, and we are challenged to “think from the animal” and ask “what matters for them?” (Despret, cited in Carter & Charles, 2018). To “think from the animal” involves a recognition that our engagement and use of animals alters natural and social systems in often profound ways. Engaging with environmental sociology from a sociology of animal studies perspective, this chapter begins a conversation on “thinking from the animal” by asking what matters for animals in environmental sociology?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These three categories are taken from Donaldson and Kymlicka (2011).

  2. 2.

    There is a connection between the material reality of the lives of working animals and human slavery since the tools, structures and ideologies that make the enslavement and oppression of other species possible are similarly employed in the enslavement of humans (Spiegel, 1997).

  3. 3.

    The Detroit Zoo was the first US animal facility to end a long-standing tradition (81 years) of keeping elephants in captivity. Winky and Wanda were sent to an elephant sanctuary in California in 2015.

  4. 4.

    A 2006 poll found that 44 percent of people who did not evacuate during Hurricane Katrina did so because they did not want to abandon their animal family members (Fritz Institute, 2006).

  5. 5.

    These cases largely remain unprosecuted or charges have been dropped (Irvine, 2009).

  6. 6.

    North Carolina is the second largest producer of swine, home to 9.7 million pigs in production and a major producer of poultry (Pierre-Louis, 2018).

  7. 7.

    Swine grown in North Carolina produce 10 billion gallons of manure annually, most from intensive farming operations (Pierre-Louis, 2018).

  8. 8.

    Sarcoptic mange is a pernicious disease that compromises the health of red foxes and coyotes, and some communities are attempting to treat the condition in foxes by injecting Ivermectin into meat baits at daily feeding stations of dry dog food over a 4–5 week period. See http://www.foxwoodwildliferescue.org/2017/01/05/treating-sarcoptic-mange-in-red-foxes/

  9. 9.

    We humans have long history of destroying liminal animals such as rats, mice, squirrels, sparrows, raccoons, coyotes, and foxes. The ritual public slaughter of agricultural pest animals was common in rural communities around ancient Rome (Futrell, 1997), and bothersome animals such as flies, grasshoppers, locusts and sparrows were excommunicated and exorcised during the animal trials of the Middle Ages (Kalof, 2007: 63).

  10. 10.

    See HSUS Fact Sheet on Wildlife Killing  Contests,  https://www.humanesociety.org/sites/default/files/docs/HSUS_Wildlife-Killing-Contests-Toolkit.pdf (Accessed July 6, 2021).

  11. 11.

    The question depends largely on the definition of “dog.” Vanak and Gompper (2009) categorize dogs into six groups: owned dogs, urban free-ranging dogs, rural free-ranging dogs, village dogs, feral dogs and wild dogs (dingoes, feral dogs and their hybrids). However, Ritchie et al. (2014) note that dingoes could fit into each of these groups which illustrates the difficulty of defining “dog,” and they argue for a definition based on spatial and temporal contexts of the study site.

  12. 12.

    Foxes may reduce Lyme disease risk in humans by controlling mice populations (O’Bryan et al., 2018: 230).

  13. 13.

    Social learning and the cultural transmission of learned behavior is common among other animal species (see for example, Bekoff, 2007; Marino, 2017; Van Schaik et al., 2003).

References

  • American Humane Rescue. (2018). American Humane first to serve. https://www.americanhumane.org/about-us/.

  • American Pet Products Association. (2018). 2017–2018 APPA national pet owners survey. Accessed Aug 22, 2018, from https://americanpetproducts.org/pubs_survey.asp

  • Arluke, A., & Atema, K. N. (2017). Roaming dogs. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies (pp. 113–134). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. (1996). Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. J., Streicker, D. G., & Altizer, S. (2015). Linking anthropogenic resources to wildlife–pathogendynamics: A review and meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 18, 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M. (2007). The emotional lives of animals: A leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy–and why they matter. Novato, CA: New World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benítez-López, A., Alkemade, R., Schipper, A. M., Ingram, D. J., Verweij, P. A., Eikelboom, J. A. J., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2017). The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations. Science, 356(6334), 180–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blenderman, A. B., Taff, D., Schwartz, F., & Lawhon, B. (2018). Dog guardians’ perceptions and behaviors related to the disposal of pet waste in city of boulder open space and mountain parks. Final Report prepared for City of Boulder, Colorado, Open Space and Mountain Parks, Pennsylvania State University and the Leave No Trace Center for Outdoor Ethics. https://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/2_2_18_OSMP_Pet_Waste_Final_Report-1-201802051053.pdf.

  • Bowers, R. M., Sullivan, A. P., Costello, E. K., Collett, J. L., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2011). Sources of bacteria in outdoor air across cities in the midwestern United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, AEM-05498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braczkowski, A. R., O'Bryan, C. J., Stringer, M. J., Watson, J. E. M., Possingham, H. P., & Beyer, H. L. (2018). Leopards provide public health benefits in Mumbai, India. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), 176–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashares, J. S., & Gaynor, K. M. (2017). Eating ecosystems: Wildlife harvest and depletion compromise socioecological stability. Science, 356(6334), 136–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, I. (2012). Zooland: The institution of captivity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder, J., Libra, B., Weyer, P., Heathcote, S., Kolpin, D., Thorne, P. S., & Wichman, M. (2007). Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(2), 308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, M. (2015). Thinking through animals: Identity, difference, indistinction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., & Charles, N. (2018). The animal challenge to sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 21(1), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E. (2015). I was a teenage vegan: Motivation and maintenance of lifestyle movements. Sociological Inquiry, 85(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E. (2019). For the birds: Protecting wildlife through the naturalist gaze. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. L. (2017). Animals in Religion. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies (pp. 571–589). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, R., & York, R. (2008). Global biodiversity decline of marine and freshwater fish: A cross-national analysis of economic, demographic, and ecological influences. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1310–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1999). A natural history of domesticated mammals. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (2012). Animals as domesticates: A worldview through history. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code 3 Associates Professional Animal Disaster Response and Resources. (2018). http://code3associates.org/.

  • Colling, S. (2020). Animal resistance in the global capitalist era. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, S. S., & Turchini, G. M. (2008). Towards understanding the impacts of the pet food industry on world fish and seafood supplies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(5), 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2013). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human-animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society, 40(7/8), 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Allen, S., & McCright, A. M. (2017). Integrating concern for animals into personal values. Anthrozoös, 30(1), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, T. S., Glen, A. S., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G., & Dickman, C. R. (2016). Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 113(40), 11261–11265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. M., Wegener, J., & Lange, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions of two mechanised wood harvesting methods in comparison with the use of draft horses for logging. European Journal of Forest Research, 131(4), 1139–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., Power, M. E., Berger, J., Bond, W. J., et al. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science, 33, 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feoktistova, N. Y., Surov, A., Tovpinetz, N. N., Kropotkina, M. V., Bogomolov, P. L., Siutz, C., et al. (2013). The common hamster as a synurbist: A history of settlement in European cities. Zoologica Poloniae, 58, 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, A. J. (2019). Animal advocacy and environmentalism: Understanding and bridging the divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz Institute. (2006) Hurricane Katrina perceptions of the affected. San Francisco, CA. http://www.fritzinstitute.org/PDFs/findings/Hurricanekatrina_Perceptions.pdf.

  • Fsahaye, S., Kumar, N., Kebede, E., & Abebe, N. (2018). Health and welfare assessment of working donkeys in and around Rama town, Tigray, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 22(1), 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futrell, A. (1997). Blood in the arena: The spectacle of Roman power. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotti, C. (2017). The struggle for compassion and justice through critical animal studies. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies (pp. 189–207). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, M. J., Greko, C., Wallinga, D. B., Beran, G. W., Riley, D. G., & Thorne, P. S. (2006). The potential role of concentrated animal feeding operations in infectious disease epidemics and antibiotic resistance. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(2), 313–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazian, D. (2015). American zoo: A sociological safari. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenebaum, J. (2012). Veganism, identity and the quest for authenticity. Food, Culture & Society, 15(1), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, R. (2011). The metabolic rifts of livestock agribusiness. Organization and Environment, 24(4), 404–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, R. (2012). Meat and inequality: Environmental health consequences of livestock agribusiness. Environmental Justice, 5(1), 54–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, R. (2013). From cattle to capital: Exchange value, animal commodification, and barbarism. Critical Sociology, 39(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, L.-Y., Ying, G. G., Liu, Y.-S., Su, H.-C., Chen, J., Liu, S.-S., & Zhao, J.-L. (2016). Discharge of swine wastes risks water quality and food safety: Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from swine sources to the receiving environments. Environment International, 92, 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M., Gerber, P., Vellinga, T., Garnett, T., Leip, A., Opio, C., & Hutchings, N. (2011). Livestock and greenhouse gas emissions: The importance of getting the numbers right. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, 779–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M. C., Thornton, P. K., & Obersteiner, M. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 110(52), 20888–20893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. F. (2015). A systems thinking perspective on the motivations and mechanisms that drive wildlife poaching. In R. A. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes (pp. 189–219). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hribal, J. (2011). Fear of the animal planet: The hidden history of animal resistance. Oakland: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2008). If you tame me: Understanding our connection with animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2009). Filling the ark: Animal welfare in disasters. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerolmack, C. (2013). The global pigeon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jesmer, B. R., Merkle, J. A., Goheen, J. R., Aikens, E. O., Beck, J. L., Courtemanch, A. B., et al. (2018). Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science, 361(6406), 1023–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L. (2007). Looking at animals in human history. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L., Whitley, C. T., Vrla, S., & Rizzolo, J. B. (2017). Anthropogenic food sources in the co-existence of humans with liminal animals in northern environments. In T. Räsänen & T. Syrjämaa (Eds.), Shared lives of humans and animals: Animal agency in the global north (pp. 147–162). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J. (2015). Captivity for conservation? Zoos at a crossroads. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(2), 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J. (2017). Ethics of the zoo. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. http://environmentalscience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-162.

  • Ladd, A. E., & Edward, B. (2002). Corporate swine and capitalist pigs: A decade of environmental injustice and protest in North Carolina. Social Justice, 29(3(89)), 26–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M. (2017). Decolonizing energy: Black lives matter and technoscientific expertise amid solar transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 30, 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications, 4, 1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana SPCA. (2018). Animal rescue facts. New Orleans, LA. https://www.la-spca.org/about/katrina-dogs-animal-rescue-stories/rescuefacts.

  • Lowe, C. N., Williams, K. S., Jenkinson, S., & Toogood, M. (2014). Environmental and social impacts of domestic dog waste in the UK: Investigating barriers to behavioural change in dog walkers. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 13(4), 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, R. (1998). Reading zoos: Representations of animals and captivity. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, R. (2012). An introduction to animals and visual culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malatinszky, Á., & Ficsor, C. (2016). Frequency and advantages of animal-powered logging for timber harvesting in Hungarian nature conservation areas. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 37(2), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, N., Selby, M., & Longo, S. (2014). Political-ecological dimensions of silvery gibbon conservation efforts: An endangered ape in (and on) the verge. International Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino, L. (2017). Cetacean cognition. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies (pp. 227–239). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, S., & Whitley, C. T. (2021). Entangled impacts: Human-animal relationships and energy development. In J. Jacquet, J. Haggerty, & G. Theodori (Eds.), Coordinating research on the social impacts of energy development: Synthesis across the social sciences. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millspaugh, J. J., Burke, T., Van Dyk, G. U. S., Slotow, R. O. B., Washburn, B. E., & Woods, R. J. (2007). Stress response of working African elephants to transportation and safari adventures. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71(4), 1257–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. (1999). The hunter-gatherer prehistory of human-animal interactions. Anthrozoös, 12, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moinard, C., Mendl, M., Nicol, C. J., & Green, L. E. (2003). A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81(4), 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulero-Pázmány, M., Stolper, R., van Essen, L. D., Negro, J. J., & Sassen, T. (2014). Remotely piloted aircraft systems as a rhinoceros anti-poaching tool in Africa. PLoS One, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083873.

  • Münster, U. (2016). Working for the forest: The ambivalent intimacies of human–elephant collaboration in south Indian wildlife conservation. Ethnos, 81(3), 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M., Edwards, M. A., Abercrombie, B., & St. Clair, C. C. (2015). Poor health is associated with use of anthropogenic resources in an urban carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0009.

  • Murray, M. H., Hill, J., Whyte, P., & St. Clair, C. C. (2016). Urban compost attracts coyotes, contains toxins, and may promote disease in urban-adapted wildlife. EcoHealth, 13(2), 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemiroff, L., & Patterson, J. (2007). Design, testing and implementation of a large-scale urban dog waste composting program. Compost Science & Utilization, 15(4), 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nibert, D. (2013). Animal oppression and human violence: Domesecration, capitalism, and global conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Bryan, C. J., Braczkowski, A. R., Beyer, H. L., Carter, N. H., Watson, J. E. M., & McDonald-Madden, E. (2018). The contribution of predators and scavengers to human Well-being. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. (2013). Animals as neighbors: The past and present of commensal species. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. Wing, Steve and Suzanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, S. C., Miller, M. A., Hardin, D., Dominik, C., Jessup, D., & Smith, W. A. (2017). Daily relative dog abundance, fecal density, and loading rates on intensively and minimally managed dog-friendly beaches in Central California. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 125(1–2), 451–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okin, G. S. (2017). Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats. PLoS One, 12(8), e0181301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, M., & Wolch, J. (2017). Lively cities: People, animals, and urban ecosystems. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies (pp. 542–570). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakpour, S., Jabaji, S., & Chénier, M. R. (2012). Frequency of antibiotic resistance in a swine facility 2.5 years after a ban on antibiotics. Microbial Ecology, 63(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. (2016). Climate change, ethics, and the wildness of wild animals. In B. Bovenkerk & F. W. J. Keulartz (Eds.), Animal ethics in the age of humans: Blurring boundaries in human-animal relationships (pp. 131–150). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. N. (2014). Total liberation: The power and promise of animal rights and the radical earth movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, M., Lefebvre, V., Peres, C. A., Banks-Leite, C., Wearn, O. R., Marsh, C. J., et al. (2017). Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature, 551, 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre-Louis, K. (2018, September 19). Lagoons of pig waste are overflowing after Florence. Yes, that’s as nasty as it sounds. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/climate/florence-hog-farms.html.

  • Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcher, J. (2017). The ethics of animal labor: A collaborative utopia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, T. A. A., Johnson, C. N., Cassey, P., Bradshaw, C. J. A., & Brook, B. W. (2015). Ecological and economic benefits to cattle rangelands of restoring an apex predator. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(2), 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prunier, A., Heinonen, M., & Quesnel, H. (2010). High physiological demands in intensively raised pigs: Impact on health and welfare. Animal: The International Journal of Animal Bioscience, 4(6), 886–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, J. P. (2018). Invasive species. https://www.britannica.com/science/invasive-species.

  • Ritchie, E. G., Dickman, C. R., Letnic, M., & Vanak, A. T. (2014). Dogs as predators and trophic regulators. In M. E. Gompper (Ed.), Free-ranging dogs and wildlife conservation (pp. 55–68). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, G. W., Coonan, T. J., Garcelon, D. K., Bascompte, J., & Laughrin, L. (2001). Feral pigs facilitate hyperpredation by golden eagles and indirectly cause the decline of the island fox. Animal Conservation, 4, 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakadevan, K., & Nguyen, M.-L. (2017). Livestock production and its impact on nutrient pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in agronomy, volume 141 (pp. 147–184). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriewer, A., Odagiri, M., Wuertz, S., Misra, P. R., Panigrahi, P., Clasen, T., & Jenkins, M. W. (2015). Human and animal fecal contamination of community water sources, stored drinking water and hands in rural India measured with validated microbial source tracking assays. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 93(3), 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. L. W., Williams, H. F., Chadwick, E., Thomas, R. J., & Perkins, S. E. (2018). Roadkill scavenging behavior in an urban environment. Journal of Urban Ecology, 4(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015). Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications. Applied Energy, 142, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, M. (1997). The dreaded comparison. New York: Mirror Books/IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T. D., Castel, V., Rosales, M. M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. A., Bryer, P. J., Davis, B. L., & McGlone, J. J. (2010). A multidisciplinary approach to assess the welfare of weaned pigs during transport at three space allowances. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science: JAAWS, 13(3), 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taronga Conservation Society Australia. (2017). 10 endangered species saved from extinction by zoos. Accessed Sep 10, 2018, from https://taronga.org.au/news

  • Temple, D., Courboulay, V., Manteca, X., Velarde, A., & Dalmau, A. (2012). The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: Assessment of feeding and housing. Animal, 6(4), 656–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (2003). Theorising nature and society in sociology: The invisibility of animals. Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twine, R. (2018). Materially constituting a sustainable food transition: The case of vegan eating practice. Sociology, 52(1), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2015, June 25). Farm animal statistics: Slaughter totals. Accessed Sep 10, 2018, from http://www.humanesociety.org/news/resources/research/stats_slaughter_totals.html

  • Vanak, A. T., & Gompper, M. E. (2009). Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: Their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Review, 39(4), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., et al. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299, 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagman, J. D., Lukas, K. E., Dennis, P. M., Willis, M. A., Carroscia, J., Gindlesperger, C., & Schook, M. W. (2018). A work-for-food enrichment program increases exploration and decreases stereotypies in four species of bears. Zoo Biology, 37(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, C. T. (2017). Altruism, risk, energy development and the human-animal relationship. PhD Dissertation: Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, C. T. (2018). Engines, sentinels and objects: Assessing the impacts of unconventional energy development on animals in the Marcellus shale region. In A. E. Ladd (Ed.), Fractured communities: Risk, impacts, and protest against hydraulic fracking in US shale regions (pp. 128–148). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, C. T. (2019). Exploring the place of animals and human-animal relationships in hydraulic fracturing discourse. Social Sciences, 8(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, C. T., Gunderson, R., & Charters, M. (2018). Public receptiveness to policies promoting plant-based diets: Framing effects and social psychological and structural influences. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, R. (2010). Livestock/deadstock: Working with farm animals from birth to slaughter. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, R. (2015). Multispecies scholarship and encounters: Changing assumptions at the human-animal nexus. Sociology, 49(2), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, S., & Wolf, S. (2000). Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(3), 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. (2018). Extinct in the wild. Accessed Oct 12, 2018, from http://www.waza.org/en/site/conservation/conservation-breeding-programmes/extinct-in-the-wild

  • Yom-Tov, Y., Yom-Tov, S., & Baagøe, H. (2003). Increase of skull size in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in Denmark during the twentieth century: An effect of improved diet? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 1037–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R., & Longo, S. B. (2017). Animals in the world: A materialist approach to sociological animal studies. Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Kalof .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kalof, L., Whitley, C.T. (2021). Animals in Environmental Sociology. In: Schaefer Caniglia, B., Jorgenson, A., Malin, S.A., Peek, L., Pellow, D.N., Huang, X. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77712-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics