Skip to main content

Heritage and Resistance: Theoretical Insights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theorizing Heritage through Non-Violent Resistance

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict ((PSCHC))

  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter theorizes on the intersection of heritage and resistance, building on empirical findings reported from different situations of conflicts in which people’s diverging rights to heritage are contested, negotiated, or even violated. Heritage and resistance are brought into conservation here to explore opportunities for a positive change. Conceived as a verb and a process, heritage has an agency. It expands into areas of life and policy, and uncritical engagement in the intersection of heritage and resistance can lead not only to unnoticed processes of biases, exclusion, or racism, but can also jeopardize their potential for the production of socially equal and just spaces. In conclusion, this chapter identifies the potentials and limitations of the intersection, manifested in the interlinked concepts of justice, value, and right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the Burra Charter was specific to the context of Australia, it was internationally adopted to undermine the WCNS. It supported a shift towards ‘place’ instead of monuments and sites, and this resulted in the inclusion of new historic places on the list of outstanding universal value. Despite these changes, the focus on the ‘tangible’ aspects of heritage continued to prevail in both international and national politics of heritage. New calls have also emerged demanding the recognition of the heritage values of non-monumental societies (loose-foot communities, tribals and Bedouins) (Smeets, 2004, p. 39).

References

  • Ahmad, Y. (2006). The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600604639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B., & Tunbridge, J. E. (2007). Pluralising Pasts Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London, Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askins, K. (2009). ‘That’s just what I do’: Placing Emotion in Academic Activism. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.03.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (1997). Street Politics: Poor People’s Movements in Iran. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baaz, M., & Lilja, M. (2017). (Re)categorization as Resistance: Civil Society Mobilizations Around the Preah Vihear Temple. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 30, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T. (2004). Pasts Beyond Memory: Museums, Evolution, Colonialism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, J. R., & Weiss M. L. (2015). Neoliberalism, Heritage Regimes, and Cultural Rights. In L. Meskell (Ed.), Global Heritage: A Reader (pp. 43–69). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, P., & Chan, B. (2015). “Putting broken pieces back together”: Reconciliation, justice, & heritage in post-conflict situations. In W. Logan, M. N. Craith, & U. Kocke (Eds.), A companion to heritage studies (pp. 491–506). Malden: Wiley..

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond Hok-Man, S. (2015). Heritage as Resistance: Preservation and Decolonisation in Southeast Asian Cities. Doctoral Thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London: Goldsmiths Research Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. S. L. (2019). Resisting Clearance and Reclaiming Place in Cyprus’ State Forests through the Work of Heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1693415

  • Hammami, F. (2016). Issues of Sharing and Mutuality in Heritage—Contesting Diaspora and Homeland Experiences in Palestine. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1166447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammami, F., & Laven D. (2017). Rethinking Heritage from Peace: Reflections from the Palestinian-Israeli Context. In D. Laven, D. Walters, & P. Davis (Eds.),(2016)Heritage and Peace Making. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammami, F., & Uzer E. (2018). Heritage and Resistance: Irregularities, Temporalities and Cumulative Impact. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1378908

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. D. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning, and the Scope of Heritage Studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53(Sep–Oct), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2009). “The right to the Just City.” In P. Marcuse, J. Connolly, J. Novy, I. Olivo, C. Potter, & J. Steil (Eds.), Searching for the Just City: Debates un Urban Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D.C., & Perry, J. (2015). ‘Heritage and Climate Change: The Future is not the Past’. In D. Harvey & J. Perry (Eds.), The Future of Heritage as Climates Change: Loss, Adaptation and Creativity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., & Hammami, F. (2015). On the Entangled Paths of Urban Resistance, City Planning and Heritage Conservation. The International Open Access Journal of plaNext: Next Generation Planning Issue, 1(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.17418/planext.2015.2vol.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Huis, I. (2019). Contesting Cultural Heritage: Decolonizing the Tropenmuseum as an Intervention in the Dutch/European Memory Complex. In T. Lähdesmäki, L. Passerini, S. Kaasik-Krogerus, & I. van Huis (Eds.), Dissonant Heritage and Memories in Contemporary Europe (Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A. & Vinthagen, S. (2020). Conceptualizing ‘Everyday Resistance’: A Transdisciplinary Approach. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1967). Le droit à la ville, L’Homme et la société, 6, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, W. (2012). Cultural Diversity, Cultural Heritage and Human Rights: Towards Heritage Management as Human Rights-based Cultural Practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(3), 231–244, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.637573

    Google Scholar 

  • Londres Fonseca, M. C. (2002). Intangible Cultural Heritage and Museum Exhibitions. ICOM UK News, 63, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1998). The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M., Thörn, C., & Thörn, H. (Eds.). (2016). Urban Uprisings: Challenging Neoliberal Urbanism in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Sidney, T., & Charles, T. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L, (Ed). (2015). Global Heritage: A Reader. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffari, A. (2015). The Heritage ’NGO’: A Case Study on the Role of Grassroots Heritage Societies in Iran and Their Perception of Cultural Geritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(9), 845–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffari, A. & Jones, T. (Eds). (2020). Cultural Heritage Activism, Politics, and Identity. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, S. (2014). Critical Urbanism. In S. Parnell & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S., & Keith M. (1997). Geographies of Resistance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D., & Betsy, R. (2002). Brazil’s Landless Workers Movement—movimiento de trabajadores rurales sem terra—MST. Social Policy, 33(1), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities in the 21st Century. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C., J. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London & New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., Shackel, P. A., & Campbell, G. (Eds.). (2011). Heritage, labour and the working classes. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stig Sørensen, M. L., Viejo-Rose, D., & Filippucci, P. (Eds.). (2019). Memorials in the aftermath of armed conflict: from history to heritage. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1991). Domination, Resistance, Compliance... Discourse. Sociological Forum, 6(3), 593–602. http://www.jstor.org/stable/684522

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlili, A. (2014). Managing Performance in Publicly Funded Museums in England: Effects, Resistances and Revisions. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.737354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunbridge, J., & Ashworth, G. (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1996). Our Creative Diversity. Paris: UNESCO Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinthagen, S. (2015). Editorial: An Invitation to Develop ‘Resistance Studies’. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D., Laven, D., & Davis, P. (2017). Heritage and Peacebuilding. Boydell & Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. L. (2006). Globalization and the Mythology of the Nation-State. In A. G. Hopkins (Ed.), Global History: Interactions between the Universal and the Local (pp. 257–284). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. R. (Ed.) (1997). Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London and Chicago: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or the Cultural Logic of Multinational Capitalism. New Left Review, 225, 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feras Hammami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hammami, F., Uzer, E. (2022). Heritage and Resistance: Theoretical Insights. In: Hammami, F., Uzer, E. (eds) Theorizing Heritage through Non-Violent Resistance. Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77708-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics