Skip to main content

Characterizing Ecosystem Services to Human Well-Being in Groundwater Dependent Desert Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Groundwater in Egypt’s Deserts

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

  • 1544 Accesses

Abstract

As groundwater use intensifies, the stakes in management decisions grow larger and more complex. Ecosystem service analysis connects groundwater management decision-making to a range of valuable outcomes for human well-being. This chapter explores conceptual developments enabling the ecosystem services associated with groundwater reserves and extraction options to be characterized, compared, and weighed in qualitative and quantitative terms by decision-makers. The application of these concepts and associated methods is illustrated through a case study located in the Nubian-Moghra Miocenene-Nile aquifer complex at Wadi Natrun in the Western Desert of Egypt. The chapter reveals a wide range of provisioning services provided by groundwater in the case study area of the Egyptian desert. It is unlikely that these could all be fully assessed. However, the case study demonstrated that groundwater managers can use the ecosystem services framework to identify and assess some of the most important benefits that groundwater provides to society, including its essential services as a buffer against water security threats. The iterative approach offers options for groundwater managers in Egypt and elsewhere to coordinate across sectors of government, engaging the public and the scientific community to overcome assessment challenges in a progressive manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that these changes in prices will have been related to factors other than groundwater conditions. Some further analysis of the effects of the removal of subsidies might be available from the World Bank in light of their work on this issue.

References

  1. Van der Gun J (2012) Groundwater and global change: trends, opportunities and challenge. UNESCO, Paris, p 44

    Google Scholar 

  2. WWAP (2014) The United Nations world water development report 2014: water and energy. UNESCO. United Nations World Water Assessment Programme, Paris, p 230

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foster T, Brozovic N, Speir C (2017) The buffer value of groundwater when well yield is limited. J Hydrol 547:638–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsur Y, Issar A (1989) The Buffer role of groundwater when supply of surface water is uncertain. Dev Water Sci 39:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MFP, van Beek LPH (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488(7410):197–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazzoni A, Heggy E, Scabbia G (2018) Forecasting water budget deficits and groundwater depletion in the main fossil aquifer systems in North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Global Environ Change 53:157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. UNDP (2013) Water governance in the Arab Region—managing scarcity and securing the future. Regional Bureau for Arab States (RBAS), Republic of Lebanon, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roumasset J, Wada CA (2013) A dynamic approach to PES pricing and finance for interlinked ecosystem services: watershed conservation and groundwater management. Ecol Econ 87:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burnett K, Pongkijvorasin S, Roumasset J, Wada CA (2015) Incentivizing interdependent resource management: watersheds, groundwater and coastal ecology. In: Handbook of water economics, pp 150–161. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782549666.00015

  10. OECD (2015) Drying wells, rising stakes. Towards sustainable agricultural groundwater use. OECD, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roumasset JA, Wada CA (2014) Integrated groundwater resource management. In: Sustainable economic development: resources, environment, and institutions, pp 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800347-3.00005-4

  13. Vaux H (2011) Groundwater under stress: the importance of management. Environ Earth Sci 62:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0490-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qureshi ME, Reeson A, Reinelt P, Brozović N, Whitten S (2012) Factors determining the economic value of groundwater. Hydrogeol J 20:821–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0867-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gohar AA, Cashman A (2018) The economic value of groundwater irrigation for food security under climate change: implication of representative concentration pathway climate scenarios. Water Resour Manage 32:3903–3918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2026-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koundouri P, Dávila OG, Anastasiou Y, Antypas A, Mavrogiorgis T, Mousoulides A, Mousoulidou M, Vasiliou K (2014) An econometric analysis of agricultural production, focusing on the shadow price of groundwater: policies towards socio-economic sustainability. Global Issues in Water Policy 7:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koundouri P, Roseta-Palma C, Englezos N (2017) Out of sight, not out of mind: developments in economic models of groundwater management. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 11:55–96. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Attia FAR (1992) Economic evaluation of groundwater development plans in Upper Egypt. Int J Water Resour Dev 8:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629208722544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Attia FAR (1989) Use of groundwater for irrigation in the Nile Valley. Water Res Develop 5:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900628908722419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El Serafy S (1998) Pricing the invaluable: the value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25:25–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00009-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Toman M (1998) Why not to calculate the value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00017-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pearce D (1998) Auditing the earth: the value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Environment 40:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139159809605092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kovacs K, West G, Xu Y (2017) The use of efficiency frontiers to evaluate the optimal land cover and irrigation practices for economic returns and ecosystem services. J Hydrol 547:474–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kovacs K, West G (2016) The influence of groundwater depletion from irrigated agriculture on the tradeoffs between ecosystem services and economic returns. PLoS ONE 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168681

  26. Kovacs KF, Xu Y, West GH, Popp M (2016) The tradeoffs between market returns from agricultural crops and non-market ecosystem service benefits on an irrigated agricultural landscape in the presence of groundwater overdraft. Water (Switzerland) 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110501

  27. DeFries R et al (2005) Analytical approaches for assessing ecosystem condition and human wellbeing. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 37–67

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tuinstra J, van Wensem J (2014) Ecosystem services in sustainable groundwater management. Sci Total Environ 485–486:798–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Griebler C, Avramov M (2015) Groundwater ecosystem services: a review. Freshwater Sci 34:355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hérivaux C, Grémont M (2019) Valuing a diversity of ecosystem services: the way forward to protect strategic groundwater resources for the future? Ecosyst Serv 35:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Henrichs T, Zurek M, Eickhout B, Kasper K, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Ribeiro T, Vuuren D, Volkery A (2010) Chapter 5 Scenario development and analysis for forward-looking ecosystem assessment. In: Ash N, Blanco H, Garcia K, Brown C et al (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being a manual for assessment practitioners, pp 151–220

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ash N, Blanco H, Brown C, Garcia K, Henrichs T, Lucas N, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Simpson R, Scholes R, Tomich T et al (2010) Ecosystems and human well-being a manual for assessment practitioners. Island Press, Washington/Covelo/London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wittmer H, Berghofer A, Forster J, Almack K (2010) The value of nature for local development. In: Sukhdev P (ed) TEEB—the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for local and regional policy makers, pp 12–27

    Google Scholar 

  34. Favretto N, Luedeling E, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ (2017) Valuing ecosystem services in semi-arid rangelands through stochastic simulation. Land Degrad Dev 28:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ericksen P, De Leeuw J, Said M, Silvestri S, Zaibet L (2012) Mapping ecosystem services in the Ewaso Ng’iro catchment. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 8:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.651487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmed M (2013) Ecosystem services. In: Arab millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. UNEP, pp 58–84

    Google Scholar 

  37. King C, Salem B (2013) Assessing the cost of groundwater degradation in the urbanizing desert area of Wadi El Natrun. In: The economy of green cities. Springer, pp 295–311

    Google Scholar 

  38. King C, Salem B (2012) A socio-ecological investigation of options to manage groundwater degradation in the western desert, Egypt. Ambio 41:490–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0255-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Salem B, Hak MGE, Khalifa S, King-Okumu C (2017) Beyond drastic in Wadi Natrun. In: Renaud F, Schuster-Wallace C (eds) Groundwater and human security. UNU, Hamilton, Ontario, pp 25–96

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pascual U, Muradian R (2010) Chapter 5: The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the ecological and economic foundations

    Google Scholar 

  41. CVG (1997) Valuing ground water: economic concepts and approaches committee on valuing ground water. Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research Council

    Google Scholar 

  42. Barbier E, Acreman M, Knowler D (1997) Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, p 138

    Google Scholar 

  43. De Groot R, Stuip M, Finlayson M, Davidson N (2006) Valuing Wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland p 66

    Google Scholar 

  44. Davies J (2007) The economics of mobile Pastoralism: a global summary. Nomadic Peoples 91–116

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davies J (2007) Total economic valuation of Kenyan Pastoralism. World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (WISP), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  46. Landers D, Nahlik A (2013) Final Ecosystem Goods and Services Classification System (FEGSCS). United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  47. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2011) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) Paper prepared for discussion at the expert meeting on ecosystem accounts organised by The UNSD, the EEA and the World Bank European Environment Agency. London, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bolt K, Ruta G, Sarraf M (2005) Estimating the cost of environmental degradation—a training manual in English, French and Arabic. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp E1-79

    Google Scholar 

  49. Croitoru L, Sarraf M (eds) (2010)The cost of environmental degradation: case studies from the Middle East and North Africa (English). World Bank, Washington, DC, p 192

    Google Scholar 

  50. GWP (2014) The links between land use and groundwater—governance provisions and management strategies to secure a ‘sustainable harvest’. Global Water Partnership, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tsur Y (2015) Conjunctive management of water resources in agriculture. In: Dinar A, Schwabe K (eds) Handbook of water economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tsur Y (1990) The stabilization role of groundwater when surface water supplies are uncertain: the implications for groundwater development. Water Resour Res 26:811–818

    Google Scholar 

  53. Favretto N, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Dallimer M, Perkins JS, Reed MS, Atlhopheng JR, Mulale K (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis to identify dryland ecosystem service trade-offs under different rangeland land uses. Ecosyst Serv 17:142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Reed MS, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Perkins JS, Atlhopheng JR, Mulale K, Favretto N (2015) Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management: linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems. J Environ Manage 151:472–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. UN (2012) System of environmental economic accounting for water. United Nations, New York, p 216

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jabarin A (2013) Environmental economic valuation of the HIMA system: the case of Zarqa River Basin—Jordan natural resource economic valuations. IUCN, Amman, Jordan, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bann C, Wood SC (2012) Valuing groundwater: a practical approach for integrating groundwater economic values into decision making—a case study in Namibia, Southern Africa. Water SA 38:461–466. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v38i3.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Idris H, Nour S (1990) Present groundwater status in Egypt and the environmental impacts. Environ Geol Water Sci 16:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01706041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmed MA, Samie SGA, El-Maghrabi HM (2011) Recharge and contamination sources of shallow and deep groundwater of pleistocene aquifer in El-Sadat industrial city: isotope and hydrochemical approaches. Environ Earth Sci 62:751–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0563-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Fekry A, Salam MA (2002) Evaluation of groundwater development scenarios in Wadi El Natrun depression. Water Sci 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  61. RIGW (1990) Hydrogeological map of Egypt scale 1:100 000 Wadi El Natrun Research Institute for Groundwater (RIGW), Ministry of Public Works and Water Resources, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibrahim S (2005) Groundwater resources management in Wadi El-Farigh and its vicinities for sustainable agricultural development. Ain Shams University, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  63. CAPMAS (2017) Population and housing census. Central Agency for Public Mobilisation and Statistics, Arab Republic of Egypt, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  64. CAPMAS (2007) Population and housing census. Central Agency for Public Mobilisation and Statistics, Arab Republic of Egypt, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  65. MALR (2000) Results of the agricultural census for the agricultural year 1999/2000: Behayra governorate. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Economic Affairs Section, Central Office for Agricultural Economy, Public Office for Agricultural Census, Arab Republic of Egypt, p 122

    Google Scholar 

  66. MALR (2010) Results of the agricultural census for the agricultural year 2009/2010: Behayra governorate. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Economic Affairs Section, Central Office for Agricultural Economy, Public Office for Agricultural Census, Arab Republic of Egypt, p 122

    Google Scholar 

  67. IBRD (2007) Project appraisal document on a proposed loan in the amount of US$145 Million to the Arab Republic of Egypt for West Delta Water Conservation and Irrigation Rehabilitation Project, 22 May 2007. World Bank, Washington, DC, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nour El-Din M (2013) Climate change risk management in Egypt proposed climate change adaptation strategy for the Ministry of Water Resources & Irrigation in Egypt Prepared for UNESCO-Cairo Office EEAA, Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, Cairo, p 116

    Google Scholar 

  69. Attia FAR, Fahmy HS, Eid MJH, Slootweg R (eds) (2005) The West Delta Water Conservation and Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (WDWCIRP) Environmental and social impacts and a framework management—plan part I: environmental and social impact assessment. Part II: environmental and social management plan—final draft. Arab Republic of Egypt Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation and World Bank, p 86

    Google Scholar 

  70. Attia F, Fahmi H, Gambarelli J, Hoevenaars R, Slootweg R, AbdelDayem S (ed) (2007) The West Delta Water Conservation and Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (WDWCIRP) environmental and social impacts and a framework management—plan part I: environmental and social impact assessment, part II: environmental and social management plan—final draft. Arab Republic of Egypt Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation and World Bank, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  71. Slootweg R, Beukering P (2008) Valuation of ecosystem services and strategic environmental assessment lessons from influential cases. Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment, Utrecht, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  72. Awad M (2002) Land use planning of Wadi El-Natrun depression towards sustainable development. University of Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  73. Salem B, Gad-El-Hak M, Khalifa S, KingOkumu C (2017) Egypt case study: beyond drastic in Wadi Natrun. In: Renaud F, Schuster-Wallace C (eds) Groundwater and human security, pp 25–96

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kumar P (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London and Washington, DC, Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zahran MA, Willis AJ (2009) The vegetation of Egypt. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8756-1

  76. Hussain S, Gundimeda H (2010) Tools for valuation and appraisal of ecosystem services in policy making. In: Wittmer H (ed) TEEB—the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for local and regional policy makers, pp 41–63

    Google Scholar 

  77. MALR (2009) Sustainable Agricultural Development Strategy towards 2030 (SADS). Agricultural Research & Development Council, Arab Republic of Egypt, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  78. Switzman H, Salem B, Gad M, Adeel Z, Coulibaly P (2018) Conservation planning as an adaptive strategy for climate change and groundwater depletion in Wadi El Natrun Egypt. Hydrogeol J 26:689–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1669-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Abdelkhalek A (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using modified drastic GIS based index at the Western Nile Delta Region, Thesis submitted in parial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master’s degree in Intergrated Water Resoures Management. Institute for Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (ITT) Cologne University of Applied Science, Germany, and Faculty of Graduate Studies, The University of Jordan, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  80. King C, Thomas DSG (2014) Monitoring environmental change and degradation in the irrigated oases of the Northern Sahara. J Arid Environ 103:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many people have provided inputs into the compilation of this chapter. They bear no responsibility for the final chapter, or any errors that it may contain. We wish to express particular thanks to Dr. Abdelazim Negm for encouragement to complete and publish this chapter. We are grateful also to Fabrice Renaud, Jaroslav Vrba and colleagues taking part in the United Nations University (UNU)—UNESCO International Hydrological Programme (IHP) international research project on Groundwater and Human Security Case Studies (GWAHS-CS) for intellectual and financial support. Additional funding for field research was provided through an Award for Doctoral study funded by ESRC/NERC, UK. We also thank Harris Switzman for advice during the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline King-Okumu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

King-Okumu, C., Abdelkhalek, A., Salem, B. (2021). Characterizing Ecosystem Services to Human Well-Being in Groundwater Dependent Desert Environments. In: Negm, A., Elkhouly, A. (eds) Groundwater in Egypt’s Deserts. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77622-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics