Abstract
Social presence has been identified as one of the key factors in influencing motivation in learning. Social presence helps in increasing interactivity which fosters genuine learning and development of a community of inquiry, development of higher levels of critical thinking, reflection, and problem-solving. An analysis of social presence and lack of social presence emphasizes the need for educators to evaluate the degree of social presence in the online learning environment. Technology affords ways for teams to build interaction within the team and with the instructor. Suggestions for best and promising practices in evaluating social presence in online technology-mediated team learning and methods for increasing social presence are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning method and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers and Education, 58(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283
Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293
Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P., & Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270109
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. JALN, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808–821.
Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256–272.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
Choe, R. C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., Toma, S. P., Shapiro, C., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barnes, G., & Crosbie, R. H. (2019). Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar55, 1–14.
Chorianopoulos, K. (2018). A taxonomy of asynchronous instructional video styles. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 294.
Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher educational course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48–s69.
Everson, M., Gundlach, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Social media and the introductory statistics course. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A69–A81.
Fahy, P. J. (2003). Indicators of support in online interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.129
Gabelica, C., Van den Bossche, P., Fiore, S. M., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2016). Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective. Human Performance, 29(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1120304
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to access cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Gautreau, C., Glaeser, B. C., Renold, L. C., Ahmed, S., Lee, J., Carter-Wells, J., Worden, M., Boynton, E. D., & Schools, J. (2012). Video conferencing guidelines for faculty and students in graduate online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 277–278.
Green, G. (2003). Developing teams: Training and development 11.06. Wiley.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
Hennessy, C., & Forrester, G. (2014). Developing a framework for effective audio feedback: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.870530
Hill, H. (2001). Team-based learning. Gower Publishing Limited.
Huang, Y. (2017). Exploring students’ acceptance of team messaging services: The roles of social presence and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1047–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12468
Ishak, T., Kurniawan, R., Zainuddin, Z., & Keumala, C. M. (2020). The role of pre-class asynchronous online video lectures in flipped-class instruction: Identifying students’ perceived need satisfaction. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.v4i1.145
Karakoyun, F., & Yapici, I. Ü. (2016). Use of digital storytelling in biology teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 895–903.
Karal, H., Cebi, A., & Turgut, Y. E. (2011). Perceptions of students who take synchronous courses through video conferencing about distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 276–293.
Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., & Jefferis, H. (2014). Social presence in online learning communities: The role of personal profiles. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.19710
Kim, Y., Kim, Y., Hwang, E., Hwang, E., Rho, S., & Rho, S. (2018). Twitter news-in-education platform for social, collaborative, and flipped learning. The Journal of Supercomputing, 74(8), 3564–3582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-016-1776-x2018
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030
Land, S., & Jonassen, D. (Eds.). (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Routledge.
Leshchenko, M., Ruban, L., & Tymchuk, L. (2017). Digital storytelling in a foreign language classroom of higher educational establishments (pp. 428–439). ICTERI.
Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37(6), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294322
Lumsden, G., Lumsden, D., & Wiethoff, C. (2010). Communicating in groups and teams: Sharing leaderships (5th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Mellon, C. A. (1999). Digital storytelling: Effective learning through the internet. Educational Technology, 39(2), 46–50.
Mendez, M. J., Arkoubi, K. A., & Cai-Hillon, Y. (2015). Business leadership education: A virtual storytellers exercise. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(1), 31.
Moridani, M. (2007). Asynchronous video streaming vs. synchronous videoconferencing for teaching a pharmacogenetic pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj710116
Muirhead, B., & Juwah, C. (2004). Interactivity in computer-mediated college and university education: A recent review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 12–20.
Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 114.
Olesova, L. A., Richardson, J., Weasenforth, D., & Meloni, C. (2011). Using asynchronous instructional audio feedback in online environments: A mixed methods study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 30–42.
Rasiah, R. R. V. (2014). Transformative higher education teaching and learning: Using social media in a team-based learning environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 369–379.
Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2016). Investigating teacher presence in courses using synchronous videoconferencing. Distance Education, 37(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1232157
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51–70.
Shen, K. N., You, A. Y., & Khalifa, M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behavior and Information Technology, 29(4), 337–348.
Shelby-Caffey, C., Úbéda, E., & Jenkins, B. (2014). Digital storytelling revisited: An educator’s use of an innovative literacy practice. The Reading Teacher, 68(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1273
Sibley, J., Ostafichuk, P., Robertson, B., Franchini, B., & Kubitz, K. (2014). Getting started with team-based learning. Stylus Publishing LLC.
Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 6.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
Thompson, R., & Lee, M. J. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1(1), 1–16.
Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34–45.
Valenzuela, F., Fisher, J., Whale, S., & Adapa, S. (2013). Developing and evaluating social presence in the online learning environment. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 60, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.7763/IPEDR.2013.V60.20
Wang, H. (2010, February). Eight ways to increase social presence in your online classes. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/eight-ways-to-increase-social-presence-in-your-online-classes/
Wang, R., Scown, P., Urquhart, C., & Hardman, J. (2014). Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9206-z
Wei, C.-W., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk, D. R. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9
Whiteside, A. L., Garrett, D. A., & Swan, K. (Eds.). (2017). Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research. ProQuest Ebook Central. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Zhan, Z., & Mei, H. (2013). Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Computers & Education, 69, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002
Zhao, S. (2003). Toward a taxonomy of copresence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Association for Educational Communications and Technology
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kairu, C. (2021). Social Presence in Technology-Enabled Team Learning Environments. In: Campbell, L.O., Hartshorne, R., DeMara, R.F. (eds) Perspectives on Digitally-Mediated Team Learning. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77614-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77614-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77613-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77614-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)