Skip to main content

A Simplistic Tool for a Lethal Phenomenon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conflicts in Curriculum Theory

Part of the book series: Education, Politics and Public Life ((EPPL))

  • 489 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter assesses the emergence and consolidation of social efficiency as the dominant curriculum tradition. The chapter unpacks how at the turn of the twentieth century, the US education initiated a new cycle in the “social project of Americanization,” completely in sync with the new and volatile demands imposed by Industrialism, a cycle championed by pedagogues such as John Franklin Bobbitt deeply influenced by Taylor and Ross social efficiency theories—a cycle quite dominant nowadays still.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paraskeva, J.M. (2021). A Simplistic Tool for a Lethal Phenomenon. In: Conflicts in Curriculum Theory. Education, Politics and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77420-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77420-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77422-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77420-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics