Abstract
The role of Africa as a geostrategically vital region is steadily growing. The leading states and economic centers of power, the United States (US), the European Union (EU), People’s Republic of China (PRC), and the Russian Federation (RF), clearly realize the high importance of the resource, human, and growing economic potential of Africa in the transition from the monopolar world order of the beginning of the century towards other possible configurations—bipolarity or multipolarity. As a result, the states claiming to be significant actors in the world arena or important forces in the future world economy, increased their ideological, economic, and military–political expansion into this actively transforming region with a huge potential. The coronavirus pandemic and the global economic crisis certainly added some new elements to the global and regional African strategies of the leading states. The new African strategies adopted by each of the four heavyweights of the global politics, as well as their economic, military, and strategic rivalry on and around the African continent should be compared in order to identify similarities and differences, irreconcilable contradictions, and possible constructive interactions. In the context of the emerging global bipolarity, the strategies of the USA and China represent antagonistic programs based on fundamentally different initial messages. In the case of the US, the line is to deter by denial the spread of the competitor’s influence using tough policies, including forceful (while not necessarily military) confrontational actions, like sanctions and trade wars. The Chinese strategy seeks, while resorting to minimal direct confrontation possible, to neutralize the US–EU obstruction to Beijing’s expansion on the continent and its freedom of interaction with partners in Africa. The Russian and EU African strategies are more passive and retroactive. The interests of those power centers are not intrinsically antagonistic, but having reconciled themselves to the role of the second in the bipolar combat formation, the two actors would not cooperate but rather snatch from each other the bits and pieces remaining from the scramble of the hegemons.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Evaluation based on World Bank projections. The official statistics of the EU (Eurostat), published in 2020, provides data for 2017 and maintains the rating sequence “PRC-USA-EU,” but gives almost equal indicators for all three world centers of economic power: 16.4%, 16.3%, and 16.0%, respectively. Russia’s share is estimated at 3.4% [The 2017 results of the International Comparison Program: China, US, and EU are the largest economies in the world. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/10868691/2-19052020-BP-EN.pdf/bb14f7f9-fc26-8aa1-60d4-7c2b509dda8e (accessed 21.11.2020)].
- 2.
AKA Belt & Road Initiative. In Russia, it is better known under the unofficial name “New Silk Road”.
- 3.
The “win–win” concept implies a mutually guaranteed benefit for all parties involved.
- 4.
In 1960, only nine members of the United Nations which did not vote in support of the milestone UN “Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples” Resolution 1514 (XV), were: United States, United Kingdom, Australia, France, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Dominican Republic, and Union of South Africa.
- 5.
The discrepancies can be explained both by the existing practices of publishing statistics on strategic raw materials and by the peculiarities of reflecting in African statistics exports to Chinese jurisdictions (including Hong Kong and Macao special administrative areas through which re-exports are carried out, etc.).
- 6.
The Trump Administration’s Prosper Africa Initiative. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF11384.pdf (accessed 25.11.2020).
- 7.
Ibid.
- 8.
Assessment based on the Raw Materials Database (SYRIO DATABASE) of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences for 2020.
- 9.
- 10.
https://www.focac.org/eng/zfgx_4/hpaq/t1684033.htm (accessed 20.11.2020).
- 11.
Ibid.
References
Abramova, I., & Fituni, L. (2019). Russia’s new strategy in the African direction. World Economy and International Relations,63(12), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-90-100
AFRICOM. (2020). Statement of General Stephen J. Townsend, United States Army Commander United States Africa Command before the Senate Armed Services Committee. Retrieved November 20, 2020, from https://www.africom.mil/document/32925/2020-posture-statement-to-congress
Arnhold, V. (2020). Accidents without borders? The renationalization of a global problem in the French media. In E. Neveu & M. Surdez (Eds.), Globalizing issues. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52044-1_6
BIC. (2018). Brussels International Center for Research and Human Rights. Lessonslearned from the 5th AU-EU summit. Retrieved November 8, 25, 2020, from https://www.bic-rhr.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/PDF-%20Lessons%20Learned%20from%20the%20AU-EU%20Summit.pdf
Bolton, J. (2018). Remarks by National Security Advisor Ambassador John R. Bolton on the Trump Administration’s New Africa Strategy. The White House. Retrieved November 17, 25, 2020, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-national-security-advisor-ambassador-john-r-bolton-trump-administrations-new-africa-strategy/
China Statistical Yearbook. (2018). Retrieved November 27, 2020, from http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2018/indexeh.htm
European Commission. (2020a). Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Towards a comprehensive strategy with Africa. Retrieved November 25, 29, 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020JC0004
European Commission. (2020b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Critical raw materials resilience: Charting a path towards greater security and sustainability. Retrieved November 25, 29, 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0474
European Council/Council of the European Union. (2020). Cotonou agreement. Retrieved November 15, 20, 2020, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/cotonou-agreement/
Eurostat (2020). The EU in the world—International trade. Retrieved November 21, 27, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/The_EU_in_the_world_-_international_trade
EY (2019, September). Attractiveness program Africa. Retrieved November 3, 25, 2020, from https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/attractiveness/ey-africa-attractiveness-report-2019.pdf
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2020, March 16). Will the coronavirus end globalization as we know it? Foreign Affairs. Retrieved September 10, 23, 2020, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2020-03-16/will-coronavirus-end-globalization-we-know-it
Flew, T. (2020) Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge of populism and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication, 16(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766519900329
Fox, B. (2020). Pandemic has derailed EU-Africa strategy, concedes Borrell. Retrieved November 15, 25, 2020, from https://www.euractiv.com/section/botswana/news/pandemic-has-derailed-eu-africa-strategy-concedes-borrell/
Gagnon, A.-G. (2020). Multinational federalism: Challenges, shortcomings and promises. Regional & Federal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1781097
Garcia-Duran, P., Leif, J. E., & Oriol, C. (2020). Managed globalization 2.0: The European Commission’s response to trade politicization. Politics and Governance,8(1), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2567
Guillemette, Y., & Turner, D. (2018). The long view: Scenarios for the world economy to 2060. OECD Economic Policy Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b4f4e03e-en
House of Commons. (2016). Foreign Affairs Committee. Libya: Examination of intervention and collapse and the UK’s future policy options. Third Report of Session 2016–17. Retrieved November 18, 2020, from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/119/119.pdf
International Monetary Fund. (2019). World economic outlook. WEO Database, April 2019 & update July 2019. Retrieved November 4, 25, 2020, from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2019/07/18/WEOupdateJuly2019
Jin, B. (2020). An inclusive world: Entering a new era of economic globalization. In China’spath of industrialization. China Insights. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1506-4_8
Langan, M. (2020). Why Europe urgently needs to rethink its unfair trade deals with Africa. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://doc-research.org/2019/04/europe-trade-africa/
McNamara, K., & Newman, A. (2020). The big reveal: COVID-19 and Globalization’s great transformations. International Organization, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000387
Nyabiage, J. (2020, January 18) China’s trade with Africa grows 2.2 per cent in 2019 to $ 208 billion. South China Morning Post. Retrieved November 25, 28, 2020, from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3046621/chinas-trade-africa-grows-22-cent-2019-us208-billion
Olivié, I., & Manuel, G. (2020). Is this the end of globalization (as we know it)? Globalizations,17(6), 990–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1716923
SYRIO DATABASE. (2020). “Raw Materials database” of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
The Trump Administration’s Prosper Africa Initiative. Retrieved November 18, 2020, from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF11384.pdf
Topaz, J. (2014). Obama’s Africa toast gets ‘personal’. Politico. Retrieved November 15, 25, 2020, from https://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/obama-toast-slavery-africa-leaders-summit-109754
Woertz, E., & Eduard, S. L. (2020). Populism and Euro-Mediterranean cooperation: The Barcelona process 25 years after. Mediterranean Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1799165
Xinhua. (2017). China sets up base in Djibouti. Retrieved November 18, 2020, from http://www.xinhuanet.com//english/2017-07/11/c_136435716.htm
Yīn Yuè, 殷悦 (2018) “八大行动” 新举措绘就中非合作新蓝图—“Bādà xíngdòng” xīn jǔcuò huì jiù zhōng fēi hézuò xīn lántú [New measures of the “Big Eight Actions” draw a new blueprint for China-Africa cooperation]. Retrieved November 20, 25, 2020, from https://focacsummit.mfa.gov.cn/chn/zpfh/t1593166.htm (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fituni, L.L. (2021). Designs of the Four: Comparing African Strategies of Russia, China, US, and EU Against the Backdrop of the (Re)emerging Bipolarity. In: Vasiliev, A.M., Degterev, D.A., Shaw, T.M. (eds) Africa and the Formation of the New System of International Relations. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77336-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77336-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77335-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77336-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)