Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Steel and Composite Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Structural Fire Engineering

Part of the book series: The Society of Fire Protection Engineers Series ((SFPES))

  • 1099 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines structural fire engineering considerations that are specific to steel, which is a common construction material. First, thermal and mechanical properties of steel at elevated temperatures are discussed. Second, failure modes specific to steel structures (e.g. connection brittleness) are examined. Lastly, pertinent analysis techniques for structural fire engineering applications involving steel structures are presented. Notably, tensile membrane action theory is covered in depth, which is a mechanism that provides thin slabs with large load-bearing capacity, resulting from large vertical displacements, where induced radial tension in the centre of the slab (due to the large deflection) is resisted by a peripheral compression ring. Also, the performance of structural steel connections under fire conditions is closely examined. In the event of a fire, the global frame response is closely linked to the behaviour of such connections. When excessive axial and rotational deformations occur at high temperature, the connections need to be robust enough to provide structural integrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. CEN. (2005b). BS EN 1993-1-2 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - part 1–8: Design of joints. British Standards Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2016). AISC Standard 360-16, Appendix 4, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ASCE/SEI 7-16: Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elghazouli, A., Cashell, K., & Izzuddin, B. (2009). Experimental evaluation of the mechanical properties of steel reinforcement at elevated temperature. Fire Safety Journal, 44(6), 909–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harmathy, T. (1967). A comprehensive creep model. Journal of Basic Engineering, 89(3), 496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao, B., & Kruppa, J. (1997). Fire resistance of composite slabs with profiled steel sheet and of composite steel concrete beams Part 2: Composite beams. Final report EUR 16822. ISSN 10185593.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eurocode 1: Basis of Design and Actions on Structures, Part 1.2: Actions on Structures – Actions on Structures Exposed to Fire, ENV 1991-1-2, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CEN. (2005a). BS EN 1993-1-2 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - part 1–2: Actions on structures exposed to fire. British Standards Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner, L., & Nethercot, D. A. (2011). Designers’ Guide to Eurocode 3, Thomas Telford, ISBN: 9780727741721

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phan, L. T., McAllister, T. P., Gross, J. L. and Hurley, M. J. (2010). Best Practice Guidelines for Structural Fire Resistance Design of Concrete and Steel Buildings NIST Technical note 1681. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, US Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozyurt, E., & Wang, Y. C. (2015). Effects of truss behaviour on critical temperatures of welded steel tubular truss members exposed to uniform fire. Engineering Structures, 88, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozyurt, E., & Wang, Y. C. (2016). Effects of non-uniform temperature distribution on critical member temperature of steel tubular truss. Engineering Structures, 116, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, C. K., & Zhang, W. (2012). Comparative experimental investigation on steel staggered-truss constructed with different joints in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 77, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, S. M., Du, Y. and Fu, J. X. (2014). Design strategies of fire safety for steel roof trusses exposed to localised fire. In 8th International conference on structures in fire, Shanghai, China (pp. 163–170)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newman, G. N., Robinson, J. T., & Bailey, C. G. (2006). Fire safe design: A new approach to multi-storey steel-framed buildings (2nd edn.), Steel Construction Institute Publication 288.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, G., Robinson, J., and Bailey, C. G. (2000). ‘SCI P288 A new approach to multi-storey steel framed buildings’, Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, SCI P288.

    Google Scholar 

  17. BSI. (1990a). Structural use of steelwork in building – Part 1: Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction: hot rolled sections. British Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  18. BSI. (1990b). Structural use of steelwork in building – Part 3: Design in composite construction. British Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  19. CEN (1994). Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures – Part 1.2: General Rules – Structural Fire Design (Draft), European Committee for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Foster, S., Chladna, M., Hsieh, C. B., & I and Plank, R. (2007). Thermal and structural behaviour of a full-scale composite building subject to a severe compartment fire. Fire Safety Journal, 42, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. BSI. (2003). Structural use of steelwork in building—Part 8: Code of practice for fire resistant design. British Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, Z., Burgess, I. W., & Plank, R. J. (2002). Modelling of six full-scale fire tests on a composite building. The Structural Engineer, 80(19), 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin, D. and Moore, D. (1999). The behaviour of multi-storey steel framed buildings in fire: A European Joint Research Programme. Cardington Test Report, prepared by British Steel Plc.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Park, M. E., (1964). Tensile membrane behaviour of uniformly loaded rectangular reinforced concrete slabs with fully restrained edges, Magazine of Concrete Research, ICE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1964.16.46.39

  25. Lim, L. (2003). Membrane action in fire exposed concrete floor systems, PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abu, A. (2009). Behaviour of composite floor systems in fire. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bailey, C. G., & Moore, D. B. (2000). The structural behaviour of steel frames with composite floor slabs subject to fire – Part 1 Theory. The Structural Engineer, 78(11), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bailey, C. G., & Moore, D. B. (2000). The structural behaviour of steel frames with composite floor slabs subject to fire – Part 2: Design. The Structural Engineer, 78(11), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hayes, B. (1968). Allowing for membrane action in the plastic analysis of rectangular reinforced concrete slabs. Magazine of Concrete Research, 20(65), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bailey, C. G., & Toh, W. S. (2007). Behaviour of concrete floor slabs at ambient and elevated temperatures. Fire Safety Journal, 42, 425–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Duchow, M. and Abu, A. K. (2014). Collapse mechanisms of edge and corner slab panels in fire conditions. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structures in Fire, 11–13 June 2014, Shanghai, China, pp. 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bailey, C. G. (2000). Design of steel structures with composite slabs at the fire limit state, Final Report No. 81415, prepared for DETR and SCI, The Building Research Establishment, Garston, UK

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bailey, C. G. (2001). Membrane action of unrestrained lightly reinforced concrete slabs at large displacements. Engineering Structures, 23, 470–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bailey, C. G. (2003). Efficient arrangement of reinforcement for membrane behaviour of composite floors in fire conditions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 59, 931–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bailey, C. G. (2004). Membrane action of slab/beam composite floor systems in fire. Engineering Structures, 26, 1691–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Clifton, C. (2001). “Design of multi-storey steel framed buildings with unprotected secondary beams or joists for dependable inelastic response in severe fires.” Steel Design and Construction Bulletin 60, New Zealand Heavy Engineering Research Association (HERA), 1–58

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clifton, G. C. (2006). Design of composite steel floor systems for severe fires. HERA Report R4–131, Manukau City, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Clifton, G. C., Gillies, A. G. and Mago N. (2010). The slab panel method: design of composite floor systems for dependable inelastic response to severe fires. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structures in Fire (SiF’10), 2–4 June 2010, East Lansing, MI, USA, pp. 492–499

    Google Scholar 

  39. Taib, M., (2012). The performance of steel framed structures with fin-plate connections in fire, PhD Thesis: The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nguyen, T., Tan, H., & Burgess, I. (2015). Behaviour of composite slab-beam systems at elevated temperatures: Experimental and numerical investigation. Engineering Structures, 82, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Buchanan, A. H., & Abu, A. (2017). Structural design for fire safety (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, Z., Burgess, I. W., & Plank, R. J. (2000). Effective stiffness modelling of composite concrete slabs in fire. Engineering Structures, 22, 1133–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. CEN (2005c). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1–2: General rules ‐ Structural fire design. EN 1994–1‐2. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang, J., & Li, G. (2018). Parameters affecting tensile membrane action of reinforced concrete floors subjected to elevated temperatures. Fire Safety Journal, 96, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Botte, W., Gouverneur, D., Caspeele, R., & Taerwe, L. (2015). Influence of design parameters on tensile membrane action in reinforced concrete slabs. Structural Engineering International, 25(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686614X14043795570174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McAllister, T., Gann, R., Averill, J., Gross, J., Grosshandler, W., Lawson, J., McGrattan, K., Nelson, H., Pitts, W., Prasad, K., Sadek, F. (2008). Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster: Structural fire response and probable collapse sequence of world trade center building 7. NIST NCSTAR 1–9. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Davison, B., & Owens, G. (2012). Steel designers' manual (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Al-Jarbri, K. (1999). The behaviour of steel and composite beam-to-column connections in fire, PhD thesis: The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  49. El-Rimawi, J., Burgess, I., & Plank, R. (1997). The influence of connection stiffness on the behaviour of steel beams in fire. Journal of Constructional, 43, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Leston-Jones, L. (1997). The influence of semi-rigid connections on the performance of steel framed structures in fire, PhD thesis: The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shi, R. (2017). A simplified steel beam-to-column connection modelling approach and influence of connection ductility on frame behaviour in fire, PhD thesis: The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yu, H.-X., Burgess, I., Davison, J. & Plank, R. (2008). Experimental investigation of the behaviour of flush end-plate connections in fire. Singapore, Proceedings of Structures in Fire Conference, pp. 150–157.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Al-Jarbri, K., Seibi, A., & Karrech, A. (2006). Modelling of unstiffened flush endplate bolted connections in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62, 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Augusto, H., Simoes da Silva, L., Rebelo, C., & Castro, J. (2016). Characterization of web panel components in double-extended bolted end-plate steel joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 116, 271–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dai, X., Wang, Y., & Bailey, C. (2010). Numerical modelling of structural fire behaviour of restrained steel beam-column assemblies using typical joint types. Engineering Structures, 32, 2337–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Haremza, C., et al. (2016). Composite joints under MN at elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 124, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu, T. (1996). Finite element modelling of behaviours of steel beams and connections in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 36(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu, T. C. (1999). Moment-rotation-temperature characteristics of steel/composite connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(10), 1188–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sarraj, M., Burgess, I., Davison, J., & Plank, R. (2007). Finite element modelling of steel fin plate connections in fire. Fire Safety Journal, 42, 408–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Selamet, S., & Garlock, M. (2014). Fire resistance of steel shear connections. Fire Safety Journal, 68, 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Spyrou, S. (2002). Development of a component-based model of steel beam-to-column joints at elevated temperatures, PhD thesis: The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tschemmernegg, F., & Humer, C. (1988). The Design of Structural-Steel Frames under consideration of the nonlinear behavior of joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 11(2), 73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Block, F., Burgess, I., Davison, J. & Plank, R. (2004). A component approach to modelling steelwork connections in fire: behaviour of column webs in compression. Nashville, Tennessee, Proceedings of ASCE Structures Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Block, F., Burgess, I., Davison, J., & Plank, R. (2007). The development of a component-based connection element for end-plate connections in fire. Fire Safety Journal, 42, 498–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dong, G., Burgess, I. & Davison, J. (2011). Component-Based Element for Endplate Connections in Fire. Prague, Proceedings of Application of Structural Fire Engineering, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dong, G., Burgess, I. & Davison, J. (2012). Application of a general component-based connection element in structural fire analysis. Qingdao, Proceedings of 11th Int. Conference on Steel, Space and Composite Structures.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dong, G., Burgess, I., Davison, J., & Sun, R.-R. (2015). Development of a general component-based connection element for structural fire engineering analysis. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, 6(4), 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Gentili, F., Costa, R. & Simoes da Silva, L. (2014). Development of a simplified model for joints in steel structures. Aveiro, Proceedings of 9º Congresso Nacional de Mecânica Experimental.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hu, Y., Davison, J., Burgess, I., & Plank, R. (2009). Component modelling of flexible end-plate connections in fire. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ramli-Sulong, N., Elghazouli, A., Izzuddin, B., & Ajit, N. (2010). Modelling of beam-to-column connections at elevated temperature using the component method. Steel and Composite Structures, 10(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Shi, R., S-S, H., & JB, D. (2018). A simplified steel beam-to-column connection modelling approach and influence of connection ductility on frame behaviour in fire. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 7(4), 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Simoes da Silva, L., Santiago, A., & Real, P. (2001). A component model for the behaviour of steel joints at elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional, 57, 1169–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sun, R., Burgess, I., Huang, Z., & Dong, G. (2015). Progressive failure modelling and ductility demand of steel beam-to-column connections in fire. Engineering Structures, 89, 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yu, H.-X., Burgess, I., Davison, J., & Plank, R. (2009). Tying capacity of web cleat connections in fire, part 2: Development of component-based model. Engineering Structures, 31, 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. ASCE/SEI (2018). Manual of Practice No. 138: Structural Fire Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers: Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Franssen, J., & VilaReal, P. (2010). Fire design of steel structures, ECCS – European Convention for Steelwork, ISBN 978-9147-099-0

    Google Scholar 

  77. EN 13381-8, Test methods or determining the contribution to the fire resistance of structural members: applied reactive protection to steel members, European Committee for Standardization, CEN, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil & Natural Resources Engineering Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Anthony Abu

  2. OFR Consultants, Manchester, UK

    Ruoxi Shi & Danny Hopkin

  3. Warringtonfire, Warrington, UK

    Mostafa Jafarian

  4. Warringtonfire, Boston, MA, USA

    Kevin LaMalva

Authors
  1. Anthony Abu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruoxi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mostafa Jafarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kevin LaMalva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Danny Hopkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Hopkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Consultancy, Warringtonfire, Boston, MA, USA

    Kevin LaMalva

  2. U.K. Consultancy, OFR Consultants, Manchester, UK

    Danny Hopkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abu, A., Shi, R., Jafarian, M., LaMalva, K., Hopkin, D. (2021). Steel and Composite Structures. In: LaMalva, K., Hopkin, D. (eds) International Handbook of Structural Fire Engineering. The Society of Fire Protection Engineers Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77123-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77123-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77122-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77123-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation