Abstract
The research results provided a new direction through the design of a Bayesian model with a panel dataset collected from 2006 to 2018. The study was modeled into two periods: Pre- and Post-Financial Crisis 2007–2008. Classification of Countries depended on the level of HDI. In the pre- and post-financial crisis 2007–2008, the positive effect of economic growth seemingly predominated. The positive effect of FDI exceeded its negative effect over the 2006–2011 period. After the financial crisis, the negative effect of FDI was found. Besides, the evidence of the return of trade protectionism was strengthened. Groups of countries with medium and very high HDI witnessed negative effects of Unemployment rate on HDI over both periods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czech, Denmark, England, Estonia, Filand, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Malaysia, Netherland, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Bahrain, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lithuania, Slovak Republic.
- 3.
Albania, Belize, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Indonesia, Iran, Jamaica, Jordan, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippine, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Ukraine.
- 4.
Bangladesh, Cambodia, Cameroon, Ghana, Honduras, India, Kenya, Morocco, Nepal, Pakistan, Vietnam, Angola, Bhutan, Cabo Verde, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Guatemala, Guyana, Kiribati, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Micronesia, Myanmar, Namibia, Nicaragua, Solomon Islands, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Vanuatu, Zambia.
References
Abdouli, M., Hammami, S.: Economic growth, FDI inflows and their impact on the environment: an empirical study for the MENA countries. Qual. Quant. 51(1), 121–146 (2017)
Aloui, Z.: The impact of Foreign Direct Investment and the institutional quality on Welfare in Latin America and Sub-saharan Africa. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (2019). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95484
Ananta, P.: Determinants of human development in Lampung province. JEP 2(3), 243–257 (2013)
Arisman, A.: Determinant of human development index in ASEAN countries. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi 7(1), 113–122 (2018)
Asghari, M.: Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. Int. J. Sci. Res. Environ. Sci. 1(6), 92–100 (2013)
Bintang, M., Ismail, N., Indra: Determinants Indeks Pembangunan Manusia: Analisa Pendekatan Maqasid Syariah Al-Ghazali: Studi Kasus: Negara-Negara OKI (Determinant of human development index based on Al-Ghazaly Maqashid Shariah approach: case in OIC countries). Eksyar 2(2), 512–534 (2015)
Çaglayan-Akay, E., Van, M.H.: Determinant of the levels of development based on the human development index: Bayesian ordered probit model. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 7(5), 425–431 (2017)
Eren, M., Çelik, A.K., Kubat, A.: Determinants of the levels of development based on the human development index: a comparison of regression models for limited dependent variables. Rev. Eur. Stud. 6(1), 10–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n1p10
Gökmenoğlu, K.K., Apinran, M.O., Taşpınar, N.: Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Human Development Index in Nigeria. Business Economics Research Journal, 9(1), 1–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2018.90
Hasan, Z.: Determinants of human resource development: an empirical analysis. IIUM J. Econ. Manag. 8(2), 157–187 (2000)
Herrero, C., Martínez, R., Villar, A.: A newer human development index. J. Hum. Dev. Capabilities 13(2), 247–268 (2012)
Hudakova, J.: Relationship between gross domestic product and human development index. Econ. Tourism 17(4), 665–672 (2018)
Kabaday, B.: Human development and trade openness: a case study on developing countries. Adv. Manag. Appl. Econ. 3(3), 193–199 (2013)
Kahneman, D., Deaton, A.: High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(38), 16489–16493 (2014)
Maddison, A.: Historical Statistics of the World Economy: 0001–2030 AD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris (2010)
Mazumdar, K.: A new approach to human development index. Rev. Soc. Econ. 61(4), 535–549 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0034676032000160895
Mustafa, G., Rizov, M., Kernohan, D.: Growth, human development, and trade: the Asian experience. Econ. Model. 61(c), 93–101 (2017)
Ranis, G., Stewart, F., Ramirez, A.: Economic growth and human development. World Dev. 28(2), 197–219 (2000)
Sharma, B., Gani, A.: The effects of foreign direct investment on human development. Global Econ. J. 4(2), 1–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2202/1524-5861.1049
Setiawan, M.B., Hakim, A.: Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Indonesia (The Indonesian human development index). Jurnal Economia 9(1), 18–26 (2013)
Shah, S.: Determinant of Huan Development Index: A Cross-Country Empirical Analysis. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MRPA), No. 73759 (2016). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73759/
Singariya, M.R.: Socioeconomic determinants of human development index in India. Manag. Adm. Sci. Rev. 3(1), 69–84 (2014)
Sofilda, E., Hermiyanti, P., Hamzah, M.Z.: Determinant variable analysis of human development index in Indonesia: case for high and low index at period 2004–2013. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 8(9), 11–27 (2015)
UNDP: Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century. Human Development Report, New York, USA (2019)
van der Vaart, A.W.: 10.2 Bernstein–von Mises Theorem. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-49603-9 (1998)
Yuliani, T., Saragih, N.: Determinants Pembangunan Manusia di Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah (Determinants of human development index in Central Java). JEJAK J. Econ. Policy 7(1), 60–72 (2014)
Zaghdoudi, K.: Is the relationship between external debt and human development non-linear? A PSTR approach for developing countries. Econ. Bull. 38(4), 2194–2216 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix 1. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of All Sample Over 2006–2011 Period
Appendix 2. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of Countries with Medium HDI Over 2006–2011 Period
Appendix 3. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of Countries with High HDI Over 2006–2011 Period
Appendix 4. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of Countries with Very High HDI Over 2006–2011 Period
Appendix 5. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of All Sample Over the 2012–2018 Period
Appendix 6. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of Countries with Medium HDI Over 2012–2018 Period
Appendix 7. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of Countries with High HDI Over 2012–2018 Period
Appendix 8. Visual Diagnostics for MCMC Convergence of Countries with Very High HDI Over 2012–2018 Period
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kieu, V.T.T., Tien, L.T. (2022). Determinants of Variation in Human Development Index Before and After the Financial Crisis: A Bayesian Analysis for Panel Data Model. In: Ngoc Thach, N., Ha, D.T., Trung, N.D., Kreinovich, V. (eds) Prediction and Causality in Econometrics and Related Topics. ECONVN 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77094-5_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77094-5_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77093-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77094-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)