Skip to main content

Language and Social (In)Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language in a Globalised World
  • 709 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces and discusses language as a concern for social justice. It starts by outlining different approaches to social justice, and how these approaches inform language education in different and contradictory ways. After that, it addresses the inseparability of language from all the protected characteristics in the UK anti-discrimination law (The Equality Act 2010), arguing for the need to protect language from oppressive and discriminatory practices and ideologies. The chapter moves on to present a roadmap for language advocacy based on awareness, solidarity and activism before it ends with a problematisation of ‘grievable’ language and strategic essentialism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, L. (2011). An epistemology for the next revolution. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alim, S. (2019). (De)occupying language. In N. Avineri, L. Graham, E. Johnson, R. Riner, & J. Rosa (Eds.), Language and social justice in practice (pp. 184–192). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badwan, K. (2020). Unmooring language for social justice: Young people talking about language in place in Manchester, UK. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2020.1796485.

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (2003). Voices of modernity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams & L. Bell (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 3–26). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynes, C. (2018, February 14). Muslim student ‘kicked off flight for speaking Arabic’ sues Southwest Airlines for racial discrimination. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/muslim-man-removed-flight-arabic-speaking-sues-southwestairlines-racial-discrimination-a8210636.html.

  • Cowal, J., & Leung, G. (2021). Activist applied linguistics. In S. Conrad, A. Hartig, & L. Santlemann (Eds.), The Cambridge introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 308–324). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, I. (2020). Power, policing, and language policy mechanisms in schools: A response to Hudson. Language in Society, 49(3), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (2020). Wales’ hierarchy of belonging: A mixed methods exploration of the attitudes and experiences of young first and second language Welsh speakers (Unpublished MA dissertation). Manchester Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1997). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 151–167). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escott, H., & Pahl, K. (2019). ‘Being in the Bin’: Affective understandings of prescriptivism and spelling in video narratives co-produced with children in a post-industrial area of the UK. Linguistics and Education, 53, 100754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, N. (2020). Fighting anti-Blackness IS real linguistics [Online]. Educational linguist: https://educationallinguist.wordpress.com/2020/05/31/fighting-anti-blackness-is-real-linguistics/.

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T. (2000). Rethinking social justice in schools: How will we recognize it when we see it? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language, contexts and consequences. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling, D. (2016). The invention of monolingualism. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Cooke, P. (2020). Reimagining voice for transrational peace education through participatory arts with South African youth. Journal of Peace Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2020.1819217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holquist, M. (2014). What would Bakhtin do? Critical Multilingualism Studies, 2(1), 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. (2020). Hospitals have left many COVID-19 patients who don’t speak English alone, confused and without proper care. [Online]. https://www.propublica.org/article/hospitals-have-left-many-covid19-patients-who-dont-speak-english-alone-confused-and-without-proper-care.

  • Komska, Y., Moyd, M., & Gramling, D. (2019). Linguistic disobedience: Restoring power to civic language. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacSwan, J. (2020). Translanguaging, language ontology, and civil rights. World Englishes, 321–333. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12464.

  • Malleson, K. (2018). Equality law and the protected characteristics. The Modern Law Review, 81(4), 598–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nail, T. (2019). Being and motion. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2002). Mother tongues, governmentality, and protectionism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 154, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2002.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2020). Pushing the ontological boundaries of English. In C. Hall & R. Wicaksono (Eds.), Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 355–367). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A. (2019). Decolonizing multilingualism. Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piller, I. (2016). Linguistic diversity and social justice. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piller, I. (2020). Covid-19 forces us to take linguistic diversity seriously. Language on the Move. [Online]. https://www.languageonthemove.com/covid-19-forces-us-to-take-linguistic-diversity-seriously/.

  • Power, S. (2012). From redistribution to recognition to representation: Social injustice and the changing politics of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2012.735154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, J. (2019). Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selleck, C. (2018) ‘We’re not fully Welsh’: Hierarchies of belonging and ‘new’ speakers of Welsh. In C. Smith-Christmas, N. Hornsby, & M. Moriaty (Eds.), New speakers of minority languages: Linguistic ideologies and practices (pp. 45–65). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, C., & Kerfoot, C. (2020). Decolonising higher education: Multilingualism, linguistic citizenship & epistemic justice (Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies Paper 265).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D. (2010). Micro-aggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronelli, G. (2015). The coloniality of language: Race, expressivity, power, and the darker side of modernity. Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s & Gender Studies, 13, 108–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khawla Badwan .

Chapter Summary

Chapter Summary

This chapter presents a critical discussion about language as a concern for social justice. I have explained how different approaches to social justice produce different, and sometimes conflicting, views on what is moral, ethical or socially just in relation to language education. I presented these different views while highlighting the importance of delving into onto-epistemological questions about language and language hierarchy in education. The chapter also addresses the link between language and the protected characteristics in the UK anti-discrimination law, arguing that language is inseparable from these characteristics and therefore, it requires protection. The chapter provides a flexible roadmap for language-based advocacy that entails awareness, solidarity and activism. Ultimately, language-based advocacy seeks to problematise the hierarchy of what is perceived as a grievable language by highlighting how grievable language cannot be separated from grievable lives and grievable bodies. The chapter ends with a section on strategic essentialism as a reproduction of the coloniality of language and the tyranny of the moored language. It concludes with a hopeful note on re-imagining communication by de-centering the focus on this thing normatively perceived as language.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Badwan, K. (2021). Language and Social (In)Justice. In: Language in a Globalised World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77087-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77087-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77086-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77087-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics