Skip to main content

Supporting Creativity and Learning at Work: Practices and Structures from Growth Companies

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

The constant change embedded in contemporary working life requires employees and organisations alike to continuously learn and, simultaneously, adapt and be creative. The potential to attract, manage and engage creative people, as well as support learning, has become increasingly important in organisational contexts. It is essential to recognise what the underlying learning theories are and how they connect with the current understanding of creativity. It is also important to study different manifestations of creativity and learning and reactively and proactively discover ways of supporting and developing both aspects in contemporary organisations. In this chapter, we first present our approach to learning and creativity and their connection in the context of working life. Then we introduce and discuss four studies on structural and practical frames supporting creativity and learning in growth companies. These studies were carried out as part of a larger research and development project on human resources management (HRM) supporting creativity and learning in Finnish growth companies (HeRMo project). Both quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interview data were utilised, and a variety of analytical tools were employed. The project examined the impact of organisational structures, supervisory work and climate on collective creativity; revealed challenges for workplace learning posed by a self-directed organisational structure; highlighted human resources development (HRD) practices supporting creativity and; made visible the practices and conflicts experienced by HRM when dealing with employee and team operations. Based on the previous literature and the findings of our research project, we have formed four conclusions that focus on supporting creativity and learning at work: (1) Creativity and learning are collective and informal phenomena at work, (2) A variety of structures and practices enable creativity and learning at work, (3) Both, equality and employee orientation in structures and practices are important, (4) Context-specific examination of creativity, learning and supporting practices is needed.

Keywords

  • Creativity
  • Workplace learning
  • Mixed methods
  • Growth companies
  • HRM
  • HRD

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77066-2_11
  • Chapter length: 28 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-77066-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvinen, T., Riivari, E., & Sajasalo, P. (2018). Lessons learned from traditional and ‘new-age’ leadership. In A. Eskola (Ed.), Navigating through changing times (pp. 95–112). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (p. 333). Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissola, R., & Imperatori, B. (2011). Organizing individual and collective creativity: Flying in the face of creativity clichés. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00597.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselie, J. P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in research on human resource management and performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bredin, K. (2006). Human resource management in project-based organisations: Challenges and changes [Doctoral dissertation, University of Linköping]. Available at http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:22649/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

  • Collin, K., Herranen, S., Auvinen, T., Riivari, E., Paloniemi, S., & Sintonen, T. (2018). Leadership as an enabler of professional agency and creativity in information technology organisations. International Journal of Training and Development, 22(3), 222–232.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K., Keronen, S., Lemmetty, S., Auvinen, T., & Riivari, E. (2021). Self-organised structure in the field of ICT – challenges for employees’ workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning. Early view: https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-10-2019-0124.

  • Collin, K., Lemmetty, S., Herranen, S., Paloniemi, S., Auvinen, T., & Riivari, E. (2017). Professional agency and creativity in information technology work. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work—An agentic perspective on professional learning (pp. 249–270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_13.

  • Collin, K., Lemmetty, S., & Riivari, R. (2020). Human resource development practices supporting creativity in Finnish growth companies. International Journal of Training and Development. Early view: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12199.

  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Functional Creativity: Products and the generation of effective novelty. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 301–320). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, K. B., Agle, B. R., Phillips, J. C., & Ingerson, M. C. (2012). The impact of moral stress compared to other stressors on employee fatigue, job satisfaction, and turnover: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(3), 377–391.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., & Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Collaborative Creativity: Socio-Cultural Perspectives, 3(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.003.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. M. A. (1996). Theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., Hennessey, B., Kaufman, J. C., Lebuda, I., Lubart, T., Montuori, A., Ness, I. J., Plucker, J., Reiter-Palmon, R., Sierra, Z., Simonton, D. K., Neves-Pereira, M. S., & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., & Howard, K. (2008). A synergistic approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 248–269.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann, P., Forsten-Astikainen, R., & Kultalahti, S. (2018). Agile HRM practices of SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management. Early view: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12483.

  • Heiskanen, T., & Jokinen, E. (2015). Resources and constraints of line manager agency in municipal reforms. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5, 79–99. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v5i3.4808.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holbeche, L. (2015). The agile organization: How to build an innovative, sustainable and resilient business. Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Climate for Creativity: A Quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Inkson, K. (2008). Are humans resources? Career Development International, 13(3), 270–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(19), 4025–4047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2012). Studying the effect of HRM practices on the knowledge-management process. Personnel Review, 42(1), 28–49.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, B.-K., McLean, G. N., & Yang, B. (2013). Creativity and human resource development: An integrative literature review and a conceptual framework for future research. Human Resource Development Review, 12(4), 390–421.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Creativity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(4), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinke, P. (2017). The ethics of HRD practice. Human Resource Development International, 20, 361–370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2016). On the nature of human resource development: Holistic agency and an almost-autoethnographical exploration of becoming. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Edmondson, A. (2017). Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmetty, S., & Collin, K. (2019). Self-directed learning as a practice of workplace learning: Interpretative repertoires of self-directed learning in ICT work. Vocations and Learning, 13, 47–70.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmetty, S., & Collin, K. (2020). Self-directed learning in creative activity: Ethnographic research from the field of technology. Journal of Creative Behaviour. Early view: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.438.

  • Lemmetty, S., Keronen, S., Auvinen, T., & Collin, K. (2020). Conflicts related to human resource management in Finnish project-based companies. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. Early view: https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/122226/169459.

  • Lilova, I., & Poell, R. F. (2019). Preferred human resource development activities and their functions: Differences in perspective between managers and employees. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(3), 185–201.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenberger, P. (2013). The role of HRD in stimulating, supporting, and sustaining creativity and innovation. Human Resource Development Review, 12, 422–455.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loyens, S. M. M., & Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: Introducing a multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36(5–66), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglich, P. (2015). Virtue ethics in employee relations. In I. Ferrero, G. R. Beabout, & A. J. G. Sison (Eds.), Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management (pp. 1–9). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, M. R. (1988). Ethical conflict at work: A critique of the literature and recommendations for future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(5), 381–387.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking, processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 245–275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, S., & Corbridge, M. (2010). People resourcing and talent planning: HRM in practice (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riivari, E., Jaakkola, M., Lemmetty, S., Keronen, S., Collin, K., & Paloniemi, S. (forthcoming). The relationship of collective creativity with managerial work and workplace climate in hierarchical and less hierarchical organizations. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (Vol. 2). Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2015). Meta-creativity: Being creative about creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 295–298.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Primary and secondary creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.011.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K., Yang, H., Shipton, H., & Bednall, T. (2017). Effects of human resource management on informal learning. In R. A. Noe & J. E. Ellingson (Eds.), Autonomous learning in the workplace (pp. 162–178). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schwepker, C. H., Jr. (1999). Research note: The relationship between ethical conflict, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions in the salesforce. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 19(1), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.676974.

  • Storey, J. (1989). New perspectives on human resource management. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/sage-handbook-of-mixed-methods-in-social-behavioral-research/book233405.

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language. In Philosophical papers; ISSN 1. Cambridge University Press. https://jyu.finna.fi/Record/jykdok.266624.

  • Thorne, L. (2010). The association between ethical conflict and adverse outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 269–276.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00012-9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015). Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 188–204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (project number 117300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaija Collin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Collin, K. et al. (2021). Supporting Creativity and Learning at Work: Practices and Structures from Growth Companies. In: Lemmetty, S., Collin, K., Glăveanu, V.P., Forsman, P. (eds) Creativity and Learning. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77066-2_11

Download citation