Skip to main content

Organizational Environment Readiness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Tool for Determining e-Learning Readiness

Abstract

Organizational environment readiness involves considering the goals, leadership support, learning culture, and finances of the organization. The organizational goals are guided by the mission and vision of the organization and should influence the performance goals. Leadership support appears as a very influential factor in encouraging and sustaining e-Learning. Learning culture represents the environment within the organization which supports e-Learning; this environment is examined as a factor which influences establishing the organization as one that values learning. Together, these areas are sections within the organizational environment readiness survey. The chapter discusses the factors to consider in environmental readiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Admiraal, W., & Lockhorst, D. (2009). E-learning in small and medium-sized enterprises across Europe attitudes towards technology, learning and training. International Small Business Journal, 27(6), 743–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATD Research. (2018). State of the industry 2018 ASTD state of the industry report. Alexandria, VA: ATD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (2002). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Sims, J., & West, J. (2019). What is an ecosystem? Incorporating 25 years of ecosystem research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3437014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borotis, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). E-learning readiness components: Key issues to consider before adopting e-learning interventions. In Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E learn 2005: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 16622–11629).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borotis, S., Poulymenakou, A. K., & Karamanis, V. A. (2005). Embedding eLearning in Corporate Training: Lessons from a Case Study. In Uskov (Ed.), Proceedings of Web Based Education: The Fourth IASTED International Conference (pp. 461–171). IASTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Z., & Duserick, F. G. (2007). An empirical study of E-learning for improving value-chain activities. Competition Forum, 5(1), 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., & Buisine, S. (2018). Innovation culture in organizations. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119549666.ch6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deeny, E. (2003). Calculating the real value of e-learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 35(2), 70–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekpe, E. O., Eneh, S. I., & Inyang, B. J. (2015). Leveraging organizational performance through effective mission statement. International Business Research, 8(9), 135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, D. P. (1990). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(2), 298–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1990.10781963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayyoumi, A., & Monteroni, V. P. (2009). The effectiveness of e-learning: Academic and business comparison. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, D. L. (2005). Evaluating distance delivery and e-learning is Kirkpatrick’s model relevant? Performance Improvement, 44(4), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2005). Planning, implementing, & evaluating e-learning initiatives: IBM case study. American Productivity & Quality Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • James-Springer, C. (2016). Building a tool for determining e-learning readiness of organizations: A design and development study (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/70912/JamesSpringer_CD_D_2016.pdf;sequence=2

  • Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. Information Science Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R., Pramjeeth, S., & Kader, A. (2018). The impact of educational technology on training and development in the banking sector. Africa Education Review, 15(1), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2005). Evaluating training programs. McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species (2nd ed.). Gulf Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, C., & Cribb, A. (2006). Lifelong learning. Training and Development, 60(10), 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (2013). ASTD 2013 State of the Industry. Workplace Learning, 67(11), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhem, W., Abushamsieh, K., & Pérez Aróstegui, M. N. (2014). Training strategies, theories, and types. Journal of Accounting, Business & Management, 21(1), 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshinskie, J. (2003). Organizational best practices for preparing e-learners. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), Preparing learners for e-learning (pp. 91–100). Hoboken, New Jersey: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturan, M., & Kutlu, B. (2010). Employee satisfaction of corporate e-training programs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5561–5565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1–2), 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. (1997). A rational approach to evaluating training programs including calculating ROI. Journal of Lending and Credit Risk Management, 79, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. (2003). Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor & Gamble. (2005). Planning, implementing, & evaluating e-learning initiatives: Proctor & Gamble case study. American Productivity & Quality Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. In The art & practice of learning organization. Doupleday Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrat, O. (2017). Building a learning organization. In: Knowledge Solutions. Springer, Singapore. https://learning.linkedin.com/resources/workplace-learning-report-2018.

  • Sharma, K. (2011). Financial implications of implementing an e-learning project. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(7), 658–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenekamp, K., Botha, G., & Moloi, K. C. (2012). Sustaining change in a learning organization. Africa Education Review, 9(2), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2012.722389.

  • van Breda-Verduijn, H., & Heijboer, M. (2016). Learning culture, continuous learning, organizational learning anthropologist. Industrial and Commercial Training, 48(2), 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

James-Springer, C., Cennamo, K. (2021). Organizational Environment Readiness. In: A Tool for Determining e-Learning Readiness. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76994-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76994-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76993-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76994-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics