Abstract
Linguistic questionnaires have gained lots of attention in the last decades. They are a prominent tool used in many fields to convey the opinion of people on different subjects. In this chapter, we propose a model for the assessment of linguistic questionnaires describing the global and individual evaluations, where we suppose that the sample weights and the missingness are both allowed. For the problem of missingness, we show a method based on the readjustment of weights. We should clarify that the proposed approach is not a correction for the missingness in the sample as widely known in survey statistics. We give the expressions of the individual and global evaluations, followed by the description of the indicators of information rate related to missing answers. The model is after illustrated by a numerical application related to the Finanzplatz data set. The objective of this empirical application is to clearly see that the obtained individual evaluations can be treated similarly to any data set in the classical theory. In addition, we will empirically remark that the obtained distributions tend to be normally distributed. Afterward, we perform different analyses by simulations on the statistical measures of these distributions. We compare the individual evaluations with respect to a variety of distances, in order to see the influence of the symmetry of the modelling fuzzy numbers and the sample sizes on different statistical measures. We close the chapter by a comparison between the evaluations by the defended model, and the ones obtained through a usual fuzzy system using different defuzzification operators. Interesting findings of this chapter are that corresponding statistical measures are independent from the sample sizes, and that the use of the traditional fuzzy rule-based systems is not always the most convenient tool when non-symmetrical modelling shapes are used, contrariwise to the defended approach. Our approach by the individual evaluations is in such situations suggested.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain “Goodness of Fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729437
BAK. (2010). FINANZPLATZ ZÜRICH 2010, Monitoring, Impact-Analyse und Ausblick. Tech. Rep. Amt fur Wirtschaft und Arbeit (AWA) des Kantons Zürich.
Berkachy, R., & Donzé, L. (2015). Linguistic questionnaire evaluation: Global and individual assessment with the signed distance defuzzification method. In Advances in Computational Intelligence Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems FS’15, Rome, Italy (vol. 34, pp. 13–20).
Berkachy, R., & Donzé, L. (2016a). Individual and global assessments with signed distance defuzzification, and characteristics of the output distributions based on an empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence - Volume 1: FCTA (pp. 75–82). ISBN: 978-989-758-201-1. https://doi.org/10.5220/006036500750082
Berkachy, R., & Donzé, L. (2016b). Linguistic questionnaire evaluation: An application of the signed distance de- fuzzification method on different fuzzy numbers. The impact on the skewness of the output distributions. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems and Advanced Applications, 3, 12–19.
Berkachy, R., & Donzé, L. (2016c). Linguistic questionnaire evaluations using the signed distance defuzzification method: Individual and global assessments in the case of missing values. In Proceedings of the 13th Applied Statistics 2016 International Conference, Ribno, Slovenia.
Berkachy, R., & Donzé, L. (2016d). Statistical characteristics of distributions obtained using the signed distance defuzzification method compared to other methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuzzy Management Methods ICFMSquare Fribourg, Switzerland (pp. 48–58).
Berkachy, R., & Donzé, L. (2017). Statistical characteristics of distributions obtained using the signed distance defuzzification method compared to other methods. In A. Meier et al. (Eds.), The Application of Fuzzy Logic for Managerial Decision Making Processes: Latest Research and Case Studies (pp. 35–45). Cham: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-319-54048-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783319540481_4
Bourquin, J. (2016). Mesures floues de la pauvreté. Une application au phénomène des working poor en Suisse. MA Thesis. University of Fribourg, Switzerland.
de Saa, R., & de la, S., et al. (2015). Fuzzy rating scale-based questionnaires and their statistical analysis. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(1), 111–126. ISSN: 1063-6706. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2307895
Donzé, L., & Berkachy, R. (2019). Fuzzy individual and global assessments and FANOVA. Application: Fuzzy measure of poverty with Swiss data. In Proceedings of the 62st World Statistics Congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ 2 from contingency tables and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. ISSN: 09528385. http://www.jstororg/stable/2340521
Fisher, R. A. (1924). The conditions under which χ 2 measures the discrepancy between observation and hypothesis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 87, 442–450. http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/statistics/fisher_jrss_87_442_24.pdf
Gil, M. Á., Lubiano, M. A., de la Rosa de Sáa, S., & Sinova, B. (2015). Analyzing data from a fuzzy rating scale-based questionnaire a case study. Psicotherma, 27(2), 182–191.
Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 399–402. ISSN: 01621459. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2283970
Lin, L., & Lee, H.-M. (2009). Fuzzy assessment method on sampling survey analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5955–5961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.087
Lin, L., & Lee, H.-M. (2010). Fuzzy assessment for sampling survey defuzzification by signed distance method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7852–7857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.052
Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably sup-posed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50(302), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478644009463897
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. ISBN: 0-471-08705-X.
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrica, 52, 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
Wang, C.-H., & Chen, S.-M. (2008). Appraising the performance of high school teachers based on fuzzy number arithmetic operations. Soft Computing, 12(9), 919–934. ISSN: 1433-7479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-007-0240-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The first section is devoted to the description of the Finanzplatz data set.
1.1 B Description of the Finanzplatz Data Base
The questionnaire, the so-called Finanzplatz Zurich: Umfrage 2010 described in BAK (2010) is a survey of the financial place of Zurich, Switzerland. On behalf of the Department of Economic Affairs of the Canton of Zurich, the ASAM (Applied Statistics And Modelling) group was in charge of the design plan and the data analysis of this survey in 2010. The chosen sample is mainly composed of financial enterprises, i.e. banks or insurances of the canton of Zurich and the surrounding. The aim of this survey is to investigate the situation of the financial market of the canton of Zurich, by answering to a written questionnaire about their actual situation and their views for the future. As such, it intends to understand the expectations of the demand, the income, and the employment of the different firms for the foreseeable future.
This questionnaire consists of 21 questions from which 19 are linguistic ones with five Likert scale terms each. This survey is then recognized as a linguistic one. These questions are divided into 4 groups. The data base is composed of 245 observations, i.e. firms. Variables related to company size and branch are also present, as well as the sampling weights. From this questionnaire, we consider 18 variables only, including 15 linguistic ones divided into 3 groups. The Table 7.4 gives a detailed description of the considered attributes.
Note that non-response exists in this data base. We excluded the records for which a particular firm did not answer to any of the questions of this questionnaire. The size of the sample becomes then 234 observations.
1.2 C Results of the Applications of Chap. 7
This Annex provides the detailed tables of results of the studies of Chap. 7. Tables 7.5 and 7.6 show the summary of the weighted statistical measures of the individual evaluations using the signed distance, classified by company size and company branch correspondingly. Table 7.7 shows the weighted statistical measures of the distributions obtained from individual evaluations using the signed distance, for cases with and without “NA”. Finally, Table 7.8 gives the summary of the statistical measures of the distributions obtained from individual evaluations using all distances, while Table 7.9 provides the measures of the output distribution of the fuzzy rule-based system with different defuzzification operators.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berkachy, R. (2021). Evaluation of Linguistic Questionnaire. In: The Signed Distance Measure in Fuzzy Statistical Analysis. Fuzzy Management Methods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76916-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76916-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76915-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76916-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)