Skip to main content

Rhetoric and the Animal Turn: Concluding Thoughts on the Benefits of the Cross-Species Study of Persuasion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

Abstract

In the last chapter of the book, I address some future directions for the cross-species study of persuasion and manipulation. There is much work to do, but this chapter reflects on some ways to inspire more thoughtful attitudes about animal communication and animal welfare. Overcoming anthropocentrism is an ambitious step that can lead us to value the lives of all creatures, despite their differences. We are all related to some degree, and we all suffer when we hurt, so unrestricted anthropocentric thought gives us license to hurt and kill when we should think carefully before wielding such power. If we can diminish hierarchical thinking and recognize it and point out its harm, then we can come one step closer to living in a world that minimizes suffering rather than compounds it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abisaid, Joseph. 2013. Framing Primate Testing: How Supporters and Opponents Construct Meaning and Shape the Debate. In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, ed. Emily Plec, 54–76. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Tony E. “Animals as Media: Speaking through/with Nonhuman Beings.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec. 17–34: New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addessi, E., A. Mancini, L. Crescimbene, C. Padoa-Schioppa, and E. Visalberghi. “Preference Transitivity and Symbolic Representation in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus Apella).” [In eng]. PloS One 3, no. 6 (2008): e2414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Gregory. “Problems in Cetacean and Other Mammalian Communication.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli and Aleksei Turovski. 303–12. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth. Dramatism and Development. Heinz Werner Lectures. Barre, MA: Clark University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callister, Deborah Cox. “Beached Whales: Tracing the Rhetorical Force of Extraordinary Material Articulations.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec. 35–53: New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit, Celeste M. “Contemporary Rhetorical Criticism: Diverse Bodies Learning New Languages.” 2006, 368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Diane. 2011. Creaturely Rhetorics. Philosophy & Rhetoric 44 (1): 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Marie-Louise. Mallet. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, David. 2010. Is a Dolphin a Person? Science 327: 1070–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafen, Susan. 2013. Listening with the Third Eye: A Phenomenological Ethnography of Animal Communicators. In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, ed. Emily Plec, 185–206. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Randy. “The Rhetoric of Science Meets the Science of Rhetoric.” POROI 9, no. 1 (2013): Article 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawhee, Debra. “Kenneth Burke’s Jungle Book.” Minnesota Review (2009): 171–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Language as Sensuous Action: Sir Richard Paget, Kenneth Burke, and Gesture-Speech Theory.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 92, no. 4 (2006): 331–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Toward a Bestial Rhetoric.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 44, no. 1 (2011): 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, Jordynn, and L. Gregory Appelbaum. “This Is Your Brain on Rhetoric: Research Directions for Neurorhetorics.” [In English]. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40, no. 5 (2010): 411–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jenell. “Disability, Animals, and the Rhetorical Boundaries of Personhood.” JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture & Politics 32, no. 1/2 (2012): 372–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, George A., and Comparative Rhetoric. 1998. An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Stephanie L., and Vincent M. Janik. “Bottlenose Dolphins Can Use Learned Vocal Labels to Address Each Other.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 32 (August 6, 2013): 13216–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis, or, the Love of Technology [in English]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, Richard, and Roger Lewin. The Sixth Extinction: Biodiversity and Its Survival. London Weidenfeld and Nicolson,1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, Susannah Bunny. “Difference without Hierarchy: Narrative Paradigms and Critical Animal Studies, a Meditation on Communication.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec. 245–63. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestel, Dominique. “The Biosemiotics and Phylogenesis of Culture.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli and Aleksei Turovski. 377–410. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milstein, T. “Greening Communication.” In Greening the Academy: Ecopedagogy Through the Liberal Arts, edited by S. D. Fassbinder, A. J. Nocella and R. Kahn. Sense Publishers, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. 1981. Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, Alex C. Adaptive Rhetoric: Evolution, Culture, and the Art of Persuasion. Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, Thomas J., and Ambient Rhetoric. 2013. The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rivas, Jesus, and Gordon M. Burghardt. 2002. Crotalomorphism: A Metaphor for Understanding Anthropomorphism by Omission. In The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition, ed. Marc Bekoff, Colin Allen, and Gordon M. Burghardt, 9–18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seegert, Natasha. 2014. Play of Sniffication: Coyotes Sing in the Margins. Philosophy and Rhetoric 47 (2): 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, Paul. 1996. The Others: How the Animals Made Us Human. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, Peter, and Mark Schaller. 2002. Authoritarianism and the Holocaust: Some Cognitive and Affective Implications. In Understanding Genocide. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling, Louise Hutchings. The Logos of the Living World: Merleau-Ponty, Animals, and Language. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture. Lawrence & Wishart, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Hal, and Luke Rendell. 2015. The Cultural Lives of Whales and Dolphins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Parrish .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parrish, A.C. (2021). Rhetoric and the Animal Turn: Concluding Thoughts on the Benefits of the Cross-Species Study of Persuasion. In: The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76712-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics