Skip to main content

A Simplified Two-Step Approach for the Seismic Retrofitting Design of Existing Structures Towards a Resiliency Enhancement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 3rd RILEM Spring Convention and Conference (RSCC2020) (RSCC 2020)

Part of the book series: RILEM Bookseries ((RILEM,volume 32))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 777 Accesses

Abstract

The resilience of a community to come across the natural hazard events is gaining popularity in planning and decision-making strategies. To utmost importance in seismic zones, is the safety and operability of structurally vulnerable existing structures, representing a high portion of the built stock. Manifested low resilience has shown many flaws in planning, managing, retrofitting the damaged structures, which in many cases takes years being completed. The scope of the research is to exploit numerical simulation strategies towards a resiliency enhancement by means of optimized retrofitting solutions. At present, the seismic design is based on elastic analysis. A simplified two-step procedure for the seismic retrofitting design is here proposed, by utilizing the capabilities of FE codes to perform advanced nonlinear analyses. In the first step, it is estimated the structural performance of the structure, whilst the vulnerable elements to be strengthened are indicated. A Retrofitting strategy is selected and implemented into the model, and in the second step, the structure is reanalyzed with the same strategy. Based on the obtained responses, each strengthening element is designed adequately to the required limit state. This strategy is computationally burdening; however, the progress in the numerical analyses makes possible its implementation, and the achieved accuracy is nonpareil. The proposed method is illustrated with a masonry church, severely damaged by the Emilia Romagna (Italy) Earthquake in 2012. The retrofitting strategies adopted for strengthening options, are the surface mounted: (a) FRP sheets; (b) GFRP bars and TRCM. Throughout the investigated case study, it is demonstrated that the vulnerable structures exhibit very low resilient features and the best strategy to enhance their resilience is by means of anterior measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Italian term for the restoring the masonry with new material respecting the architectural requirements.

References

  1. Booth, E.: Dealing with earthquakes: the practice of seismic engineering ‘as if people mattered.’ Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16, 1661–1724 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mebarki, A.: Resilience: theory and metrics—a metal structure as demonstrator. Eng. Struct. 138, 425–433 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Contreras, D., Forino, G., Blaschke, T.: Measuring the progress of a recovery process after an earthquake: the case of L’Aquila, Italy (2017). ISBN 3464732568

    Google Scholar 

  4. Valensise, G., Tarabusi, G., Guidoboni, E., Ferrari, G.: The forgotten vulnerability: a geology- and history-based approach for ranking the seismic risk of earthquake-prone communities of the Italian Apennines. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 25, 289–300 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, A., Guedes, J.M., Varum, H.: Structural Rehabilitation of Old Buildings. In: Costa, A., Guedes, J.M., Varum, H. (eds.) Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, vol. 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2014). ISBN 978-3-642-39685-4

    Google Scholar 

  6. NTC: Aggiornamento delle “Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni”—NTC 2018, Italy, p. 372 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reinhorn, A.M., Cimellaro, G.P.: Consideration of resilience of communities in structural design. In: Fischinger, M. (ed.) Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 401–421. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grünthal, G.: European Macroseismic Scale 1998, vol. 15 (1998). ISBN 2879770084

    Google Scholar 

  9. D’Ayala, D., Speranza, E.: Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq. Spectra 19, 479–509 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giuffrè, A.: Monumenti e terremoti. Multigrafica Editrice, Roma (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. DPCM: Linee guida per la valutazione e la riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto del M.I.T del (2008), Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Acito, M., Magrinelli, E., Milani, G., Tiberti, S.: Seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: numerical insight on damage. J. Build. Eng. 101081 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Milani, G., Shehu, R., Valente, M.: Seismic upgrading of a Masonry Church with FRP composites. Mater. Sci. Forum 866, 119–123 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milani, G., Shehu, R., Valente, M.: Effects of FRP application on the seismic response of a masonry church in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). In: Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1790, pp. 130003-1–4. AIP Publishing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maio, R., Estêvão, J.M.C., Ferreira, T.M., Vicente, R.: Cost-benefit analysis of traditional seismic retrofitting strategies integrated in the renovation of stone masonry buildings. Eng. Struct. 206, 110050 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aşıkoğlu, A., Avşar, Ö., Lourenço, P.B., Silva, L.C.: Effectiveness of seismic retrofitting of a historical masonry structure: Kütahya Kurşunlu Mosque, Turkey. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. NTC: Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”, vol. 35, p. 337 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., Oñate, E.: A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int. J. Solids Struct. 25, 299–326 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Milani, G., Shehu, R., Valente, M.: Seismic vulnerability reduction of masonry churches: a case study. Procedia Eng. 199, 272–277 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramaglia, G., Fabbrocino, F., Lignola, G.P., Prota, A.: Unified theory for flexural strengthening of masonry with composites. Materials (Basel) 12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ramirez, R., Maljaee, H., Ghiassi, B., Lourenço, P.B., Oliveira, D.V.: Bond behavior degradation between FRP and masonry under aggressive environmental conditions. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. CNR DT 200: Istruzioni per la Progettazione, l ’ Esecuzione ed il Controllo di Interventi di Consolidamento Statico mediante l ’ utilizzo di Compositi Fibrorinforzati Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. CNR-DT 203: Istruzioni per la Progettazione, l’Esecuzione ed il Controllo di Strutture di Calcestruzzo Armato con Barre di Materiale Composito Fibrorinforzato (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. CNR-DT 215: Istruzioni per la Progettazione, l’Esecuzione ed il Controllo di Interventi di Consolidamento Statico mediante l’utilizo do Compositi Fibrorinforzati a Matrice Inorganica (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Shehu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shehu, R. (2021). A Simplified Two-Step Approach for the Seismic Retrofitting Design of Existing Structures Towards a Resiliency Enhancement. In: Pereira, E.B., Barros, J.A.O., Figueiredo, F.P. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd RILEM Spring Convention and Conference (RSCC2020). RSCC 2020. RILEM Bookseries, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76547-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76547-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76546-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76547-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics