Abstract
This chapter explores opportunities for conversation that seek to foster mutual understanding in polarized situations. To reach this common ground, we traced how bridging occurred interactively after the riots in Charlottesville (Virginia, USA) between individuals and groups with different backgrounds and identities. We examined two of a series of dialogues that were held by the Listen First Project in Charlottesville. This project featured participants working together to move toward healing and reconciliation on the divisive topic of race. Drawing lessons from the particular situation in Charlottesville, this chapter illustrates how building bridges through talk contributes to develop trust and relationships across divides (bridging social capital) and thereby fosters social cohesion and inclusion.
“People fail to get along because they fear each other; they fear each other because they don’t know each other; they don’t know each other because they have not communicated with each other.”
—Martin Luther King Jr.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See YouTube: https://youtu.be/k3ohYBCZp1k.
- 2.
See YouTube: https://youtu.be/XlVA8TfzccU.
References
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
Bishop, Bill, and Robert G. Cushing. 2009. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston: Mariner Books.
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2018. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brummans, Boris H.J.M., Linda L. Putnam, Barbara Gray, Ralph Hanke, Roy J. Lewicki, and Carolyn Wiethoff. 2008. Making Sense of Intractable Multiparty Conflict: A Study of Framing in Four Environmental Disputes. Communication Monographs 75 (1): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750801952735.
Dessel, Adrienne, and Mary E. Rogge. 2008. Evaluation of Intergroup Dialogue: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 26 (2): 199–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.230.
Dewulf, Art, and René Bouwen. 2012. Issue Framing in Conversations for Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 48 (2): 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312438858.
Dewulf, Art, Barbara Gray, Linda Putnam, Roy Lewicki, Noelle Aarts, Rene Bouwen, and Cees Van Woerkum. 2009. Disentangling Approaches to Framing in Conflict and Negotiation Research: A Meta-Paradigmatic Perspective. Human Relations 62 (2): 155–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708100356.
Doornbosch, Linda M., and Korien van Vuuren. 2019a. Joy Through Tough Conversations: Interactional Framing Strategies for Connecting Divided Groups in a Polarized Society. [Work in Progress].
Doornbosch, Linda M., and Mark van Vuuren. 2019b. Building Bridges Through Talk: Exploring the Role of Dialogue in Developing Bridging Social Capital. In Theoretical Approaches to Multi-Cultural Positive Psychological Interventions, ed. L.E. Van Zyl and S. Rothmann Sr., 477–503. Switzerland: Springer.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Escobar, Oliver. 2011. Public Dialogue and Deliberation: A Communication Perspective for Public Engagement Practitioners. Edinburg, UK: Beacons for Public Engagement.
Fraser, James, and Edward Kick. 2000. The Interpretive Repertoires of Whites on Race-Targeted Policies: Claims Making of Reverse Discrimination. Sociological Perspectives 43 (1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389780.
Gee, J.P. 2015. Discourse, Small d, Big D. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. K. Tracy, T. Sandel, and C. Ilie, 1–5. Hoboken, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gibson, Stephen. 2018. Discursive Psychology and Peace Psychology: Discursive Psychology Perspectives. In Discourse, Peace, and Conflict: Discursive Psychology Perspectives, ed. S. Gibson, 1–25. Switzerland: Springer.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goodman, Simon. 2017. How to Conduct a Psychological Discourse Analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 9 (2): 142–153.
Haidt, Jonathan D. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Hassenforder, Emeline, Marcela Brugnach, Beth Cullen, Nils Ferrand, Olivier Barreteau, Katherine Anne Daniell, and Jamie Pittock. 2016. Managing Frame Diversity in Environmental Participatory Processes—Example from the Fogera Woreda in Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management 177: 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.052.
Herzig, Margaret, and Laura Chasin. 2006. Fostering Dialogue Across Divides: A Nuts and Bolts Guide from Essential Partners. Cambridge, MA: Essential Partners.
Hewstone, Miles, Mark Rubin, and Hazel Willis. 2002. Intergroup Bias. Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1): 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109.
King, Martin L., October 15, 1962. Speech by Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr at Cornell College. Cornell College, Mount Vernon, Iowa.
Maiese, Michelle. 2003, September. Dialogue. ‘Beyond intractability.’ Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/dialogue.
O’Neil, Moira. 2009. Invisible Structures of Opportunity: How Media Depictions of Race Trivialize Issues of Diversity and Disparity, 3–5. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute.
Pariser, Eli. 2012. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Potter, Jonathan. 2011. Discursive Psychology and Discourse Analysis. In Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. J.P. Gee and M. Handford, 104–119. London: Routledge.
Race in America. 2019. Pew Research Center. Accessed November 4, 2019. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/04/09/race-in-america-2019/.
Stains, Robert R. 2016. Cultivating Courageous Communities Through the Practice and Power of Dialogue. Mitchell Hamline Law Review 42 (5): 1518–1545.
Stokoe, Elisabeth. 2018. How to Increase Participation in a Conflict Resolution Process: Insights from Discursive Psychology. In Discourse, Peace, and Conflict: Discursive Psychology Perspectives, ed. Stephen Gibson, 29–47. Switzerland: Springer.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, Paul J. 2014. The Role of Language in Conflict and Conflict Resolution. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, ed. T.M. Holtgraves, 459–470. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Van Gorp, Baldwin. 2005. Where Is the Frame? European Journal of Communication 20 (4): 484–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253.
———. 2007. Het reconstrueren van frames via inductieve inhoudsanalyse: uitgangspunten en procedures. Kwalon 12 (2): 13–18.
Zúñiga, Ximena. 2003. Bridging Differences through Dialogue. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience 7 (6): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/108648220300700603.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doornbosch, L., van Vuuren, M. (2021). Building Bridges after a Riot: Talking toward Mutual Understanding following Charlottesville. In: Chiluwa, I. (eds) Discourse and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76485-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76485-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76484-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76485-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)