Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Water Footprint of the Life Cycle of Buildings: Case Study in Andalusia, Spain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances of Footprint Family for Sustainable Energy and Industrial Systems

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

The building sector is one of the major consumers of water resources, according to the United Nations Environmental Program, buildings and their associated industry consume 30% of the fresh water available worldwide. Optimizing this resource usage is a key factor and makes it necessary to analyze it with environmental and economic indicators, so that the magnitude of the impact can be qualified and quantified, and covering all the building life cycle. The analysis includes the first stage, the project conception, follows with the assessment of raw materials and its manufacture, continues with the use and maintenance, and finalizes with the demolition of the building. The water consumed in all those processes or Virtual Water (VW) can be the key to the reduction of the built environment impact. Because the total water consumption of a building includes not only the water that has been required off-site to manufacture the materials used, as well as the water embodied in the production of energy, also the direct water used in the building needs to be studied. This together can be considered the building water footprint (WF). A methodology based on the quantity surveying of the building project which includes materials and machinery is used for the inventory. The WF quantification is treated similarly to a project budget. A case study of a residential building in Huelva, Spain is evaluated. The most impacting stage is the use followed by the construction, being other stages less significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACCD (2018) Andalusia Government (2018) Andalusia Construction Cost Database (ACCD). https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/fomentoyvivienda/areas/vivienda-rehabilitacion/planes-instrumentos/paginas/ACCD-sept-2017.html. Accessed 11 January 2019

  2. Adalberth K (1997) Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: a method. Build Environ 32(4):317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alba-Rodríguez MD, Martínez-Rocamora A, González-Vallejo P, et al (2017) Building rehabilitation versus demolition and new construction: Economic and environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 66:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2017.06.002

  4. Allan JA (1993) Fortunately, there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydropolitical futures would be impossible. Priorities for water resources allocation and management. Overseas Development Administration, London, UK, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bardhan S (2011) Assessment of water resource consumption in building construction in India. In: Brebbia CA, Villacampa Esteve Y (eds) Ecosytems and sustainable development, vol. VIII. WIT press, pp 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beltran MJ, Velazquez E (2015) The political ecology of virtual water and water footprint. Reflections on the need for a critical analysis of virtual water flow indicators in the economy. J CritAl Econ 20:second half

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blengini GA (2009) Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Building and Environment, 44:319–330

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blengini GA, Di Carlo, T (2010) The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy Build 42:869–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buyle M, Braet J, Audenaert A (2013) Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CE3X (2012) CE3X v2.3—Energy certification program for existing buildings. IDAE Guide: CE3 X Existing Buildings Energy Rating User Manual, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chang Y, Huang Z, Ries R, Masanet E (2016) The embodied air pollutant emissions and water footprints of buildings in China: a quantification using disaggregated input-output life cycle inventory model. J Clean Prod 113:274–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chastas P, Theodosiou T, Kontoleon KJ, Bikas D (2018) Normalising and assessing carbon emissions in the building sector: A review on the embodied CO2emissions of residential buildings. Build Environ 130:212–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crawford RH, Pullen S (2011) Life cycle water analysis of a residential building and its occupants. Build Res Inf 39(6):589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CSI/CSC (2016) Construction Specifications Institute/Construction Specifications Canada. Masterformat Manual of Practice (MP2-1). Alexandria, Va

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cubillo F, Moreno T, Ortega S (2008) Microcomponents and explanatory factors of domestic water consumption in the Community of Madrid. No. 4. R&D&I notebooks. Elizabeth II Canal. Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  16. Department of Housing, Public Works and Transport of the Basque Government. 2012. ‘BDEU in the Basque Country’

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ecoinvent Centre (2013) Ecoinvent database v3 ecoinvent report. www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed 30 December 2018

  18. ECO-Platform (www.eco-platform.org/)

  19. European Commission (2007) Comisión Europea- Secretaría General. 2007. Guía para la Estrategia Europea de Desarrollo Sostenible, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  20. European Parliament—Council of the European Union (2003). Integrated product policy. Development of the environmental life cycle concept. COM, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  21. Férriz Papí JA (2012) Water consumption in buildings: Embebed water in construction materials

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G (2005) The Ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework (7 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Freire-Guerrero A, Marrero-Meléndez M (2015) Ecological footprint in indirect costs of construction, pp 969–80 in Proceedings of the II International congress on sustainable construction and eco-efficient solutions : Seville 25–27 May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freire Guerrero A, Alba Rodríguez M (2019) Desirée, Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn:A budget for the ecological footprint of buildings is possible: a case study using the dwelling construction cost database of Andalusia. En: Sustainable Cities and Society 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101737

  25. Gleick PH (2013) The world’s water, Volume 8. The biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  26. Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) (2008) The dollars and sense of green buildings 2008: Building the business case for green buildings in Australia. GBCA, Melbourne, VIC

    Google Scholar 

  27. González-Vallejo P, Marrero M, Solís-Guzmán J (2015) The ecological footprint of dwelling construction in Spain. Ecol Ind 52:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. González-Vallejo P, Solís-Guzmán J, Llácer R, Marrero M (2015) The construction of residential buildings in Spain in the period 2007–2010 and their impact according to the Indicator Ecological Footprint. Cons Rep 67(539): https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.14.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guggemos AA, Horvath A (2005) Comparison of the environmental effects of buildings with steel and concrete structure. J Infrastructure Syst 11:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hardy L, Garrido A (2010) Analysis and evaluation of the relationships between water and energy in Spain, Virtual Water Papers

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hoekstra AY, Hung PQ (2002) ‘Virtual water trade A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value Water Res Rep Ser 11:166

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hoekstra AY (2008) The water footprint of food. Water Food 109:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799968-5.00007-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. IDAE (2011) Institute for diversification and energy savings: ‘CO2/CO2 Emission Factors

    Google Scholar 

  34. IETcc (2012) Catalogue of constructive elements of the CTE. Eduardo Torroja Institute of Construction Sciences (IETcc)’. Retrieved http://www.codigotecnico.org/web/recursos/aplicaciones/contenido/texto_0012.html

  35. INE (2019) National institute of statistics [Data file]. Recovered from http://www.ine.es

  36. ISO (1994) ISO/TR 14177. International organization for standardization, ISO. classification of information in the construction industry. ISO/TR 14177:1994. Switzerland: ISO, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  37. ISO (2011) ISO-15686-1:2011. International Organization for Standardization, ISO. Buildings and constructed assets— Service life planning—Part 1: General principles and framework. Switzerland: ISO, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  38. ISO Standard (2006) Norma AERNOR, 2006. UNE-EN ISO 14040:2006. Madrid AENOR 2006. Gestión ambiental. Análisis de ciclo de vida. Principios y marco de referencia.: AENOR, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  39. ISO Standard, 2015. Norma AERNOR, 2015. UNE-EN ISO 14046:2015. AENOR 2015.Environmental management. Water Footprint. Principles, requirements, and guidelines. Madrid: AENOR, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jones AR (1987) CI/SfB Construction Indexing Manual. Royal institute of British architects RIBA, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  41. Knoeri C, Sanyé-Mengual E, Althaus H-J (2013) Recycled and conventional concrete comparative ACL for structural applications Int J Life cycle assessment, 909–918, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0544-2

  42. Kua HW, Maghimai M (2017) The revised anti-concrete steel debate: built-in global warming potential and energy analysis based on attributional and consequent outlook for the J Ind life cycle Ecol, 21:82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12409

  43. Larralde L (2014) Evaluation of the Ecological Footprint of the building in the residential sector of Mexico. Master’s Degree Work. University of Seville, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maciel T, Stumpf M, Kern A (2016) Management system proposal for planning and controlling construction waste. Propuesta de un sistema de planificación y control de residuos en la construcción. Rev Ing construcción 31:105–116. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50732016000200004

  45. Marrero M, Ramirez-De-Arellano A (2010) The building cost system in Andalusia: application to construction and demolition waste management. Constr Manag Econ 28(5):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Marrero M, Freire Guerrero A, Solís Guzmán J, Rivero Camacho C (2014) Study of the ecological footprint of the transformation of land use. Safety and Environment. Mapfre Foundation 2000(136):6–14

    Google Scholar 

  47. Marrero M, Puerto M, Rivero-Camacho C, et al (2017) Assessing the economic impact and ecological footprint of construction and demolition waste during the urbanization of rural land. Resour Conserv Recycl 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.020

  48. Marrero M, Rivero-Camacho C, Desirée Alba-Rodríguez M (2020) What Are We Discarding during the Life Cycle of a Building? Case Studies of Social Housing in Andalusia, Spain. Waste Manag 102:391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Martínez-Rocamora A, Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M (2016) LCA databases focused on construction materials: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Martínez-Rocamora A, Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M (2016) Toward the Ecological Footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Utility consumption and cleaning tasks. Ecol Indic 69:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Martínez Rocamora A, Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M (2017) Ecological footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Maintenance tasks and final results. Energy Build 155. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.038

  52. McCormack M, Treloar GJ, Palmowski L, Crawford R (2007) Modelling direct and indirect water requirements of construction. Build Res Inform 35(2):156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Meng J, Chen GQ, Shao L, Li JS, Tang HS, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Asaadi F (2014) Virtual water accounting for building: case study for E-town, Beijing. J Clean Prod 68:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ministry of the Environment and Planning of the Territory, Community of Madrid (2007) ‘BPCM Madrid’

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ministry of Presilence (2008) Royal Decree 105/2008, of 1 February, regulating the production and management of construction and demolition waste. Official journal official gazette of the state, n. 38. Spain, 2008. Available in: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2008/BOE-A-2008-2486-consolidado.pdf

  56. Ministry of Infrastructure, Territory and Environment (2014) BDC-IVE Valencia. https://www.five.es/basedatos/Visualizador/Base14/index.htm

  57. Naredo Pérez JM (coord.) (2009) Virtual water and hydrological footprint in the Community of Madrid. R&D&I Notebooks, Cnal de Isabel II, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  58. Official College of Quantity Surveyors (2012) Technical Architects and Building Engineers of Guadalajara. 2012. ‘PRECIOCENTRO of Guadalajara’

    Google Scholar 

  59. Omniclass (2012) A strategy for classifying the built environment—Table 13: Spaces by function

    Google Scholar 

  60. REE (2014–2018) The Spanish electric system/The Spanish Electric System

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rivero Camacho C, Muñoz Sanguinetti C, Marrero Meléndez M (2018) Calculation of the Ecological Footprint in the life cycle for the urbanization phase of a housing complex in Chile, under the ARDITEC model. In Interdisciplinary congress of research in architecture, design, city and territory, Chile, pp 82–99

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rivero Camacho C (2020) Estudio de huellas en el ciclo de vida del edificio residencial. Tesis doctoral

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rivero et al (2020) Rivero-Camacho, Cristina, Martín-Del-Río, Juan Jesús, Solís-Guzmán, Jaime, Marrero, Madelyn, 2020. Ecological Footprint of the life cycle of buildings

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rodríguez de Lucio A, Perea B, Larrea P, Sevilla J, Falkner A (2010) The Spanish electric model in 2030. Scenarios and alternatives

    Google Scholar 

  65. Royal Degree (314/2006) March 17, which approves the Technical Building Code. Consolidated text with amendments to RD 1371/2007 of 19 October and correction of BOE errors of 25 January 2008. Spain. Revision in force since September 13, 2013. Official Gazette of the State, 28 March 2006, No. 74, pp. 11816–11831. Accessed 16 April 2015. Available at: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2006/03/28/pdfs/A11816-11831.pdf Samadpour P, Faryadi Sh (2008) Determination of ecological footprints of dense and high-rise districts, case study of Elahie neighbourhood, Tehran. J Environmental Stud 34(45):63–72

  66. Pérez R, Rocío M, Desirée AR, Meléndez M (2017) Systems of water supply and sanitation for domestic use. Water Footprint and Carbon Footprint Evaluation: First Results. Comunicación en congreso. IV International Congress on Construction and Building Research. - Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España. 2017

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pérez R, Rocío M, Rodríguez A, Desirée M, Raúl C, Guzmán S, Marrero Meléndez M (2019a) HEREVEA Tool for Economic and Environmental Impact Evaluation for Sustainable Planning Policy in Housing Renovation. En: Sustainability 11(10):2852–2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102852

  68. Pérez R, Rocío M, Rodríguez A, Desirée M, Marrero Meléndez M (2019) The water footprint of the naturalization of the cities. Evaluation of the water balance of the city garden. Conferencia Congreso no publicada. The International Society for Ecological Modelling Global Conference 2019. Salzburg Congress Centre, Salzburg, Austria. 2019

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pérez R, Rocío M, Rodríguez A, Desirée M, Marrero Meléndez M (2020) The water footprint of city naturalisation. Evaluation of the water balance of city gardens. En: Ecological Modelling. 2020. Vol. 424. Núm. 109031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109031

  70. Skaar C, Labonnote N, Gradeci K (2018) From zero-emission buildings (ZEBs) to zero-emission neighborhoods (ZEN): an ACL mapping review based on Sustain algorithms. Times 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072405

  71. SEOPAN (2008) Machinery costs manual (in Spanish: Manual de costes de maquinaria). Available:http://www.concretonline.com/pdf/07construcciones/art_tec/SeopanManualCostes.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2016

  72. SIMAPRO Software ACV

    Google Scholar 

  73. Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M, Ramírez-De-Arellano A (2013) Methodology for determining the ecological footprint of the construction of residential buildings in Andalusia (Spain). Ecol Indic 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.008

  74. Solís-Guzmán J, Rivero-Camacho C, Alba-Rodríguez D, Martínez-Rocamora A (2018) Carbon footprint estimation tool for residential buildings for non-specialized users: OERCO2 project. Sustain 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051359

  75. Telford T (1991) Civil Engineering Standard Method of Measurement, 3rd edn. LTD, UK, pp 4–39

    Google Scholar 

  76. Trigaux D, Oosterbosch B, De Troyer F, Allacker K (2017) A design tool to assess the demand for heating energy and the associated financial and environmental impact on neighborhoods Energy construction 152:516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.057

  77. UNE-EN 15804 (2012) Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations - Core rules for the product category of construction products

    Google Scholar 

  78. UNE-EN 15978 (2012) Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation Method

    Google Scholar 

  79. UNE-EN ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework

    Google Scholar 

  80. UNE-EN ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  81. UNE-EN 15459-1 (2018) AENOR, 2018. Energy efficiency of buildings. Economic evaluation procedure of the energy systems of buildings. Part 1: Calculation method, Module M1-14. Spanish Association of Standardization and Certification. Madrid, Spain, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  82. UniFormatTM. The Construction Specifications Institute (1998) A uniform classification of construction systems and assemblies. Alexandria, VA’

    Google Scholar 

  83. United Nations Environmental Programme (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Velázquez E, Madrid C, Beltrán MJ (2011) Rethinking concepts of virtual water and water footprint in relation to the production–consumption binomial and the water–energy nexus. Water Resour Manage 25:743–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Verbeeck G, Chickens H (2010) Building lifecycle inventory: a calculation method. Build Reign Times 45(2010):1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. WFN (2011) Water Footprint Network. ISBN: 978-1-84971-279-8

    Google Scholar 

  87. Zabalza BI, Valero CA, Aranda UA (2011) Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46:1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The University of Seville is grateful for funding the research work presented, through a pre-doctoral contract, for the development of the R&D&I program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architectural Constructions II. School of Building Engineering, University of Seville, Avenida Reina Mercedes no 4, 41012, Seville, Spain

    Cristina Rivero-Camacho & Madelyn Marrero

Authors
  1. Cristina Rivero-Camacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madelyn Marrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madelyn Marrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Jingzheng Ren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rivero-Camacho, C., Marrero, M. (2022). Water Footprint of the Life Cycle of Buildings: Case Study in Andalusia, Spain. In: Ren, J. (eds) Advances of Footprint Family for Sustainable Energy and Industrial Systems. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76441-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76441-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76440-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76441-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation