Skip to main content

Is Learning by Teaching an Effective Approach in Mixed-Reality Robotic Training Systems?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the extended reality training systems (XRTSs), including an expanding integration of such systems in actual training programs of industry and educational institutions. Despite pedagogists had developed multiple didactic models with the aim of ameliorating the effectiveness of knowledge transfer, the vast majority of XRTSs are sticking to the practice of adapting the traditional model approach. Besides, other approaches are started to be considered, like the Learning by Teaching (LBT), but for other kinds of intelligent training systems like those involving service robots. In the presented work, a mixed-reality robotic training system (MRRTS) devised with the capability of supporting the LBT is presented. A study involving electronic engineering students with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of the LBT pedagogical model when applied to a MRRTS by comparing it with a consolidated approach is performed. Results indicated that while both approaches granted a good knowledge transfer, the LBT was far superior in terms of long-term retention of the information at the cost of a higher time spent in training.

This work has been partially supported by the VR@POLITO initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Anki Cozmo: https://anki.com/en-us/cozmo.html.

  2. 2.

    Cozmo’s SDK: http://cozmosdk.anki.com/docs/index.html.

  3. 3.

    Input tool manual and Thèvenin’s theorem cheat-sheet http://tiny.cc/s8utsz.

  4. 4.

    Questionnaires and Tests: http://tiny.cc/p9utsz.

References

  1. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robotics 1(1), 71–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baylor, A.L.: Three research directions for affective learning technologies. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS] (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt: Learning by teaching: a new agent paradigm for educational software. Appl. Artif. Intell. 19(3–4), 363–392 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke, J., et al.: SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chuah, S.H.W.: Why and who will adopt extended reality technology? Literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Literature Review, Synthesis, and Future Research Agenda, 13 December 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duran, D.: Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innov. Educ. Teach. Inter. 54(5), 476–484 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiorella, L., Mayer, R.E.: Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 39(2), 75–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hurkmans, B., Rajagopal, K.: The use of extended reality technologies for learning in industry. In: EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, pp. 900–903. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamberti, F., Pratticò, F.G., Calandra, D., Piumatti, G., Bazzano, F., Villani, T.R.: Robotic gaming and user interaction: impact of autonomous behaviors and emotional features. In: 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno, R.: Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instr. Sci. 32(1–2), 99–113 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muldner, K., Girotto, V., Lozano, C., Burleson, W., Walker, E.A.: The impact of a social robot’s attributions for success and failure in a teachable agent framework. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Okita, S.Y., Schwartz, D.L.: Learning by teaching human pupils and teachable agents: the importance of recursive feedback. J. Learn. Sci. 22(3), 375–412 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pratticò, F.G., Lamberti, F.: Mixed-reality robotic games: design guidelines for effective entertainment with consumer robots. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 10, 6–16 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.: Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(4), 534–574 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprawls, P.: Evolving models for medical physics education and training: a global perspective. Biomed. Imaging Interv. J. 4(1), e16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strada, F., Bottino, A., Lamberti, F., Mormando, G., Ingrassia, P.L.: Holo-BLSD-A holographic tool for self-training and self-evaluation of emergency response skills. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. (2019, in press). https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2019.2925777

  17. Tanaka, F., Matsuzoe, S.: Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 1(1), 78–95 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Topping, K.J., Dehkinet, R., Blanch, S., Corcelles, M., Duran, D.: Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring. Comput. Educ. 61, 225–231 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker, E., Girotto, V., Kim, Y., Muldner, K.: The effects of physical form and embodied action in a teachable robot for geometry learning. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 381–385. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Werfel, J.: Embodied teachable agents: Learning by teaching robots. In: The 13th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Gabriele Pratticò .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pratticò, F.G., Merino, F.N., Lamberti, F. (2021). Is Learning by Teaching an Effective Approach in Mixed-Reality Robotic Training Systems?. In: Shaghaghi, N., Lamberti, F., Beams, B., Shariatmadari, R., Amer, A. (eds) Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. INTETAIN 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 377. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76426-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76426-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76425-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76426-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics