Skip to main content

Investors Embrace Gender Diversity, Not Female CEOs: The Role of Gender in Startup Fundraising

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN 2020)

Abstract

The allocation of venture capital is one of the primary factors determining who takes products to market, which startups succeed or fail, and as such who gets to participate in the shaping of our collective economy. While gender diversity contributes to startup success, most funding is allocated to male-only entrepreneurial teams. In the wake of COVID-19, 2020 is seeing a notable decline in funding to female and mixed-gender teams, giving raise to an urgent need to study and correct the longstanding gender bias in startup funding allocation.

We conduct an in-depth data analysis of over 48,000 companies on Crunchbase, comparing funding allocation based on the gender composition of founding teams. Detailed findings across diverse industries and geographies are presented. Further, we construct machine learning models to predict whether startups will reach an equity round, revealing the surprising finding that the CEO’s gender is the primary determining factor for attaining funding. Policy implications for this pressing issue are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Raising a priced round is a major milestone that offers startups the means to succeed.

  2. 2.

    In startups, the role of CEO is most often taken by one of the founders. This is nearly ubiquitous at early stages.

  3. 3.

    The pipeline problem is often perceived as the primary cause of the gender gap in startup funding allocation, suggesting that the gap would be eliminated if women were as interested as men in pursuing entrepreneurship. We devise and apply analysis methods that shed light into these issues in a manner that cannot be reduced to the pipeline problem.

  4. 4.

    https://www.crunchbase.com/.

  5. 5.

    We utilized the following name-based gender classifier: https://github.com/clintval/gender-predictor. We retrained the model, achieving an accuracy of 97.10%.

  6. 6.

    Further, many venture capital firms built their own custom models which they do not make public in order to maintain a competitive advantage.

  7. 7.

    As mention above, while a gender gap exits at all startup stages, investors are most reluctant to invest in women in the early stages, where female ventures are 65% less likely to receive funding [4].

  8. 8.

    We report feature importance for the interpretable tree-based models, emphasizing that all models obtained comparable accuracy. Importance analysis for other models are left for future work.

  9. 9.

    Gender information has been incorporated into previous ML models for startup success, see, for example [11].

  10. 10.

    There is a prevalent notion that the key to eradicating gender bias in startup investing lies in increasing the number of female investors. This view is oversimplified and potentially misleading. Both men and women are highly prone to bias against women [15]. While increasing gender diversity amongst investors is important for a variety of reasons, tackling gender bias against female founders calls for more comprehensive solutions.

References

  1. Pitchbook. The VC female founders dashboard (2020). https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/the-vc-female-founders-dashboard

  2. Ewens, M., Townsend, R.R.: Are early stage investors biased against women? J. Financ. Econ. 135(3), 653–677 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Forbes. Does gender bias have an impact on venture funding? (2019). https://medium.com/@EventerpriseAG/does-gender-bias-have-an-impact-on-venture-funding-fba3375a5bb. Accessed 25 Oct 2019

  4. Guzman, J., Kacperczyk, A.O.: Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7), 1666–1680 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruef, M., Aldrich, H.E., Carter, N.M.: The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among us entrepreneurs. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68(2), 195–222 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, T., Aldrich, H.E.: Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79(2), 303–327 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman, S., Robb, A.: Sources of funding for new women-owned firms. W. New Eng. L. Rev. 32, 497 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greene, P.G., Brush, C.G., Hart, M.M., Saparito, P.: Patterns of venture capital funding: is gender a factor? Venture Cap.: Int. J. Entrep. Finance 3(1), 63–83 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krishna, A., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A.: Predicting the outcome of startups: less failure, more success. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 798–805. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halabí, C.E., Lussier, R.: A model for predicting small firm performance: increasing the probability of entrepreneurial success. Documentos de Trabajo 3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arroyo, J., Corea, F., Jimenez-Diaz, G., Recio-Garcia, J.A.: Assessment of machine learning performance for decision support in venture capital investments. IEEE Access 7, 124233–124243 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Ramadorai, T., Walther, A.: Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. SSRN Electron. J. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. The world’s top 100 universities, June 2020. https://www.topuniversities.com/student-info/choosing-university/worlds-top-100-universities

  14. Kanze, D., Huang, L., Conley, M.A., Higgins, E.T.: We ask men to win and women not to lose: closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Manag. J. 61(2), 586–614 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): Tackling Social Norms: A Game Changer for Gender Inequalities. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M.: The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: evidence from a field experiment. Manag. Sci. 59(7), 1514–1528 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., Yee, L.: Delivering through diversity. McKinsey & Company Report (2018). Accessed 3 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  18. First Round. 10 Years (2019). http://10years.firstround.com/. Accessed 1 Nov 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margareta Ackerman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Appendix

A Appendix

This appendix includes additional information on the data used in our analysis (Tables 5, 6 and 7).

Table 5. Global startup hubs total number and percentage of companies per region
Table 6. US startup hubs total number and percentage of companies per region
Table 7. Total and percentage of companies per industry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cassion, C., Qian, Y., Bossou, C., Ackerman, M. (2021). Investors Embrace Gender Diversity, Not Female CEOs: The Role of Gender in Startup Fundraising. In: Shaghaghi, N., Lamberti, F., Beams, B., Shariatmadari, R., Amer, A. (eds) Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. INTETAIN 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 377. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76426-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76426-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76425-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76426-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics