Skip to main content

Abstract

Brain tumor is an abnormal cell population that occurs in the human brain. Nowadays, medical imaging techniques play an essential role in tumor diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a medical imaging technique that uses radio waves and a magnetic field as sound waves are created to produce detailed images of tissues and organs in the human body by computer. In this study, three different methods were reviewed and compared to the tumor’s extraction from a set of MRI brain images. These methods are seeded region growing, k-means, and global thresholding. The images used in this study are obtained from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and Kaggle. All images are grayscale and in JPEG format. The images from TCIA dataset are 100 images that contain abnormal (with a tumor) brain MRI images while there are 35 images in the Kaggle dataset. The Kaggle dataset contains 20 normal images and 15 abnormal images. The results show that the k-means segmentation algorithm performed better than the others on TCIA dataset according to the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), the Peak to Signal Noise Ration (PSNR), and Segmentation Accuracy while global thresholding is the best on Kaggle dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balafar, M.A., Ramli, A.R., Saripan, M.I., Mashohor, S.: Review of brain MRI image segmentation methods. Artif. Intell. Rev. 33(3), 261–274 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mishra, A., Rai, A., Yadav, A.: Medical image processing: a challenging analysis. Int. J. Bio-Sci. Bio-Technol. 6(2), 187–194 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Osman, A.F.: Automated brain tumor segmentation on magnetic resonance images and patient’s overall survival prediction using support vector machines. In: International MICCAI Brain Lesion Workshop, pp. 435–449. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gordillo, N., Montseny, E., Sobrevilla, P.: State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31(8), 1426–1438 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lakshmi, S., Sankaranarayanan, D.V.: A study of edge detection techniques for segmentation computing approaches. In: IJCA Special Issue on “Computer Aided Soft Computing Techniques for Imaging and Biomedical Applications” CASCT, pp. 35–40 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, N., Ruan, S., Liao, S.L.Q., Zhu, Y.: Kernel feature selection to fuse multispectral MRI images for brain tumor segmentation. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 115(2), 256–269 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gahukar, S.D., Salankar, S.S.: Segmentation of MRI brain image using fuzzy c means for brain tumor diagnosis. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 4(4), 107–111 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Logeswari, T., Karnan, M.: An enhanced implementation of brain tumor detection using segmentation based on soft computing. In: 2010 International Conference on Signal Acquisition and Processing, pp. 243–247. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhide, A., Patil, P., Dhande, S.: Brain segmentation using fuzzy c means clustering to detect tumour region. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Electron. Eng. 1(2), 85–90 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ilhan, U., Ilhan, A.: Brain tumor segmentation based on a new threshold approach. Proc. Comput. Sci. 120, 580–587 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubey, R., Hanmandlu, M., Vasikarla, S.: Evaluation of three methods for MRI brain tumor segmentation. In: 2011 Eighth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pp. 494–499. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Subashini, M., Sahoo, M., Kumar, S.: Brain tumor detection using pulse coupled neural network (PCNN) and back propagation network (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Natarajan, P., Krishnan, N., Kenkre, N.S., Nancy, S., Singh, B.P.: Tumor detection using threshold operation in MRI brain images. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, I., Neeru, N.: Performance comparison of various image denoising filters under spatial domain. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 96(19), 21–30 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hore, S., Chakraborty, S., Chatterjee, S., Dey, N., Ashour, A.S., Van Chung, L., Le, D.N.: An integrated interactive technique for image segmentation using stack based seeded region growing and thresholding. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (2088-8708) 6(6), 2773–2780 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Biswas, B., Soroardi, H.S., Islam, M.J.: Brain tumor detection with tumor region analysis using adaptive thresholding and morphological operation. In: 2018 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology (iCEEiCT), pp. 375–380. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vijayanagar, V.: Multiscale modeling for image analysis of brain tumor detection and segmentation using histogram thresholding. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 3(8), 7525–7534 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sujan, M., Alam, N., Noman, S.A., Islam, M.J.: A segmentation based automated system for brain tumor detection. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 153(10), 41–49 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bennet, M., Babu, G., Lokesh, S., Sankaranarayanan, S.: Testing of Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Hierarchal Self Organizing Map (HSOM) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Cancer Imaging Archive (2017). https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/

  21. https://kaggle.com/

  22. Fawcett, T.: An introduction to ROC analysis (PDF). Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oriani, E.: QPSNR: A Quick PSNR/SSIM Analyzer for Linux. Accessed 6 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willmott, C., Matsuura, K.: On the use of dimensioned measures of error to evaluate the performance of spatial interpolators. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20, 89–102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810500286976

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Maher Shedid, for his valuable guidance, support, and motivation throughout this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mohammed, E., Hassaan, M., Amin, S., Ebied, H.M. (2021). Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis. In: Hassanien, A.E., et al. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision (AICV2021). AICV 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1377. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76346-6_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics