Skip to main content

On the Application of Heterogeneous Transfer Learning to Population-Based Structural Health Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1059 Accesses

Abstract

Population-based structural health monitoring (PBSHM) is a branch of structural health monitoring (SHM) which seeks to leverage information from across a population of structures, with the aim of making robust data-based models that generalise across the population, allowing information to be exchanged and harnessed in constructing better inferences than considering an individual structure alone. PBSHM approaches overcome many of the challenges associated with conventional data-based SHM, such as limited labelled observations in training, classifiers failing to generalise when structural modifications or environmental variations occur, etc. Transfer learning provides an important set of tools in performing PBSHM, with the technologies offering mechanisms for transferring label information between structures, and the ability to harness all the available information from all structures in the population, creating a single classification model that generalises across the complete population. This paper explores heterogeneous transfer learning, a branch of transfer learning where datasets have inconsistent feature spaces, i.e. the dimensions of datasets from one structure are different to those from another. In PBSHM, this scenario arises for several reasons; for example, the data acquisition processes on each structure may be different: e.g. the sample rates and durations were different for each structure, leading to transmissibilities with a different number of spectral lines. The paper compares two heterogeneous transfer learning approaches that are formed in a discriminative manner, namely kernelised Bayesian transfer learning and heterogeneous feature augmentation. The techniques are benchmarked against conventional approaches to data-based SHM, with the benefits of a heterogeneous transfer learning approach highlighted by a case study on a Gnat aircraft wing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the sake of clarity, dependencies on any of the hyperparameters ζ are dropped from the notation in this paper.

  2. 2.

    For specific details the reader is referred to [23].

References

  1. Worden, K., Dulieu-Barton, J.M.: An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures. Struct. Health Monit. 3(1), 85–98 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Worden, K., Manson, G.,: The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1851), 515–537 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Figueiredo, E., Park, G., Farrar, C.R., Worden, K., Figueiras, J.: Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability. Struct. Health Monit. 10(6), 559–572 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective. Wiley, Chichester (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, L.A., Gardner, P., Gosliga, J., Dervilis, N., Papatheou, E., Maguire, A.E., Campos, C., Rogers, T.J., Cross, E.J., Worden, K.: Foundations of population-based structural health monitoring, Part I: homogeneous populations and forms. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 148, 107141 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gosliga, J., Gardner, P.P., Bull, L.A., Dervilis, N., Worden, K.: Foundations of population-based structural health monitoring, Part II: heterogeneous populations and structures as graphs, networks, and communities. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 148, 107144 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner, P., Bull, L.A., Gosliga, J., Dervilis, N., Worden, K.: Foundations of population-based structural health monitoring, Part III: heterogeneous populations, transfer and mapping. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 149, 107142 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao, P., Zhang, S., Tang, J.: Preprocessing-free gear fault diagnosis using small datasets with deep convolutional neural network-based transfer learning. IEEE Access 6, 26241–26253 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorafshan, S., Thomas, R.J., Maguire, M.: Comparison of deep convolutional neural networks and edge detectors for image-based crack detection in concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 186, 1031–1045 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vetrivel, A., Gerke, M., Kerle, N., Nex, F., Vosselman, G.: Disaster damage detection through synergistic use of deep learning and 3D point cloud features derived from very high resolution oblique aerial images, and multiple-kernel-learning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 140, 45–59 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, Y., Mosalam, K.M.: Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 33(9), 748–768 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng, C., Zhang, H., Wang, S., Li, Y., Wang, H., Yan, F.: Structural damage detection using deep convolutional neural network and transfer learning. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 23, 4493–4502 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jang, K., Kim, N., An, Y.: Deep learning-based autonomous concrete crack evaluation through hybrid image scanning. Struct. Health Monit. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718821719

  14. Dhieb, N., Ghazzai, H., Besbes, H., Massoud, Y.: A very deep transfer learning model for vehicle damage detection and localization. In: 2019 31st International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM), pp. 158–161 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., Pekcan, G.: Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors 20(10), 2778 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chakraborty, D., Kovvali, N., Chakraborty, B., Papandreou-Suppappola, A., Chattopadhyay, A.: Structural damage detection with insufficient data using transfer learning techniques. In: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, p. 798147 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ye, J., Kobayashi, T., Tsuda, H., Murakawa, M.: Robust hammering echo analysis for concrete assessment with transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, pp. 943–949 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, W., Peng, G., Li, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.: A new deep learning model for fault diagnosis with good anti-noise and domain adaptation ability on raw vibration signals. Sensors 17(2), 425 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, X., Zhang, W., Ding, Q., Sun, J.-Q.: Multi-layer domain adaptation method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Signal Process. 157, 180–197 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Q., Michau, G., Fink, O.: Domain adaptive transfer learning for fault diagnosis. In: 2019 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Paris), pp. 279–285 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner, P., Worden, K.: On the application of domain adaptation for aiding supervised SHM methods. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, pp. 3347–3357 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gardner, P., Liu, X., Worden, K.: On the application of domain adaptation in structural health monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 138, 106550 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gönen, M., Margolin, A.A.: Kernelized Bayesian transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duan, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I.W.: Learning with augmented features for heterogeneous domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, W., Duan, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I.W.: Learning with augmented features for supervised and semi-supervised heterogeneous domain adaptation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 36, 1134–1148 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pan, S.J., Yang, Q.: A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22, 1345–1359 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Wang, D.: A survey of transfer learning. J. Big Data 3, 29 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Day, O., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey on heterogeneous transfer learning. J. Big Data 4, 29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tipping, M.E.: The relevance vector machine. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 652–658. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Worden, K., Manson, G., Allman, D.: Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part I. Novelty detection on a laboratory structure. J. Sound Vib. 259(2), 323–343 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Manson, G., Worden, K., Allman, D.: Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part II. Novelty detection on a gnat aircraft. J. Sound Vib. 259(2), 345–363 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Manson, G., Worden, K., Allman, D.: Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part III. Damage location on an aircraft wing. J. Sound Vib. 259(2), 365–385 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Worden, K., Manson, G., Hilson, G., Pierce, S.G.: Genetic optimisation of a neural damage locator. J. Sound Vib. 309(3), 529–544 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bull, L.A., Worden, K., Fuentes, R., Manson, G., Cross, E.J., Dervilis, N.: Outlier ensembles: a robust method for damage detection and unsupervised feature extraction from high-dimensional data. J. Sound Vib. 453, 126–150 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsialiamanis, G., Wagg, D.J., Gardner, P., Dervilis, N., Worden, K.: On partitioning of an SHM problem and parallels with transfer learning. In: Proceedings of IMAC XXXVIII International Conference on Modal Analysis, Houston (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gretton, A., Sriperumbudur, B., Sejdinovic, D., Strathmann, H., Pontil, M.: Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests. In: Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1205–1213 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council via grants EP/R006768/1, EP/R003645/1, and EP/R004900/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Gardner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gardner, P.A., Bull, L.A., Dervilis, N., Worden, K. (2022). On the Application of Heterogeneous Transfer Learning to Population-Based Structural Health Monitoring. In: Madarshahian, R., Hemez, F. (eds) Data Science in Engineering, Volume 9. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76004-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76004-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76003-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76004-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics