Skip to main content

The Dialogue Café as a Participatory Method in Research—Potentials and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Involving Methods in Youth Research

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

Abstract

This chapter outlines and reflects upon how the method of dialogue café can function to promote young people’s active participation in research regarding young people in vulnerable life situations. The aim is to address the research question What are the potentials and challenges of using the dialogue café as an approach in a participatory action research context? After presenting experiences from one of the dialogue cafés in the interdisciplinary and participatory action project Youth in flight, the chapter will introduce an epistemological and conceptual framework for the idea of a dialogue café as a research approach. Based on the experiences from the café, informed by Bakhtin and Freire’s theoretical perspectives on dialogue, the chapter identifies and discusses core tensions, dilemmas and conflicts that can occur as a result of this approach; Power imbalance, the tension between the idea of empowerment in the encounter with claims of controlling the research process, protecting vulnerability and ensuring privacy constraints. The chapter reflects upon what might be the researcher’s particular responsibility when involving vulnerable young people in this kind of meeting, and suggests its potential: The dialogue café can be seen as a laboratory, where dilemmas and power relations are exposed, and which in turn makes it possible to explore, expand and exceed the distribution of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoyesky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Education and the democratic person: Towards a political conception of democratic education. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 740–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2014). From experimentalism to existentialism: Writing in the margins of philosophy of education. In L. J. Waks (Ed.), Leaders in philosophy of education: Intellectual self-portraits (Second Series). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemark, J. (2017). Neutrality or phronetic skills: A paradox in the praxis of citizen dialogues organized by municipal administration. Social Pedagogy, 3(65), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.,& Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. Berrett-Hoehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman Philips, M., & Huzzard, T. (2007). Developmental magic? Two takes on a dialogue conference. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A., Smith, A., Taylor, N. (2009). Children’s participation as a struggle over recognition: Exploring the promise of dialogue. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people's participation: Perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 315–327). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 edited by Colin Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesø, R. (2010). Ungdom, risiko og anerkjennelse; hvordan støtte vilje til endring? Tidsskrift for Ungdomsforskning, 10(1), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesø, R. (2015). Youth at risk or terms at risk? Young, 23(3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follesø, R., Halås, C., & Anvik, C. (2016). Sett, hørt og forstått? Om profesjonelle møter med unge i sårbare livssituasjoner. Universitetsforl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J., Johannessen, A., & Psoinos, M. (2011). Partnership in Practice Research: A Norwegian Experience. Social Work & Society, 9(1). Practice Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forskningsetiske komiteer. (2016). Forskningsetiske retningslinjer for samfunnsvitenskap, humaniora, juss og teologi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouché, C., Light, G. (2010). An invitation to dialogue ‘The World Café’ in social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 10(1), 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., Ramos, M., & Macedo, D. (2014). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Thirtieth anniversary ed.). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2003). Forståelsens filosofi / utvalgte hermeneutiske skrifter. Cappelen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjermestad, A., Luteberget, L., Midjo, T., & Witsø, A. (2019). Preparing a dialogue conference together with persons with intellectual disabilities. Nordic Social Work Research, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Progressing children’s participation: Exploring the potential of a dialogical turn. Childhood, 17(3), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A., Powell, M. A., & Taylor, N. (2015). Ethical research involving children: Encouraging reflexive engagement in research with children and young people. Children & Society, 29(5), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1999). Kraften i de bedre argumenter. Ad Notam Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halås, C. T. (2012). Ungdom i svev. Å oppdage muligheter med utsatte unge. Phd- avhandling, Universitetet i Nordland

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. (2001). Participatory action research and social work: A critical appraisal. International Social Work, 44(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J., Gubrium, J. F. (2009). The active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research—Theory, method and practice (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2005). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingulfsvann, A.S., Jakobsen, O., & Nystad, Ø. (2015). Developing sustainable societies—A dialogical network perspective. International Journal of Social Economics;

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, J., & Steier, F. (2013). Frames, framing, and designed conversational processes. Lessons from the World Café. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(3) 388–405. NTL Institute Reprints and Permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886313484511.

  • Kellett, M. (2011). Empowering children and young people as researchers: Overcoming barriers and building capacity. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (1st ed.). Springer Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kögler, H. (1999). The power of dialogue: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2011). Every child’s to be heard—A resource guide on the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child General Comment no. 12. Save the Children and UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, L. (2007). Voice is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelmark, M., & Hauge, H. (2003). Helsefremmende arbeid i en brytningstid: Fra monolog til dialog? Fagbokforlaget[Health promoting work in a period of change: From monologue to dialogue].

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, M., & Kent, E. (2011). Dialogical action: Moving from community-based to community-driven participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 21(7), 1000–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1997). The focus groups as qualitative research. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natland, S., Bjerke, E., & Torstenssen, T. B. (2019). Opplevelser av god hjelp i møter med Nav. Fontene Forskning, 12(1), 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T. (2007). Bordet fanger—temakafe som arbeidsform. Arbeidsnotat Nordlandsforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålshaugen, Ø. (1992). Aksjonsforskning: En nyttig vitenskap? Et innspill i fire satser. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålshaugen. Ø. (2014). Dialogues in innovation: Interactive learning and interactive research as means for a context sensitive regional innovation policy. International Journal of Action Research, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. (2011). The promise of dialogue: The dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge. John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L., Kristiansen, M., Vehviläinen, M., & Gunnarsson, E. (2012). Characteristics and challenges of collaborative research: Further perspectives on reflexive strategies. In Knowledge and power in collaborative research: A reflexive approach (pp. 263–288). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, M. E., & Huzzard, T. (2007). Developmental magic? Two takes on a dialogue conference. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, V. (2011). Working in the Café: Lessons in group dialogue. The Learning Organization, 18(5), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471111151693.

  • Seim, S., & Slettebø, T. (2011). Collective participation in child protection services: partnership or tokenism? European Journal of Social Work, 14(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.500477.

  • Shamrova, D., & Cummings, C. (2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research on which this chapter is based was funded by Nord University and County Governor of Nordland, Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catrine Torbjørnsen Halås .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Halås, C.T. (2021). The Dialogue Café as a Participatory Method in Research—Potentials and Challenges. In: Wulf-Andersen, T., Follesø, R., Olsen, T. (eds) Involving Methods in Youth Research. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75941-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75941-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75940-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75941-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics