Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to discuss the use of photo-elicitation and the sharing of a piece of music as a point of departure for second wave longitudinal interviews with young people aged 17–30 years. More specifically, such an approach was used to support the young people in gaining control and planning what they share in research. I argue that photo-talk and music-talk brought forward a dialogue whereby the participants acted as co-researchers, but in two different ways: (1) photo-elicitation empowered the participants to represent what was important in their everyday lives, whereas (2) playing music together created a sensory space—a zoning of the interview—that facilitated the sharing of difficult emotions and unlived lives related to past events. I conclude that through a combination of music-talk and photo-talk, the participants told two very different stories about growing up in care, but still from their own perspectives, as through these mediums they choose what to include or exclude in their life stories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The theoretical outline of music in everyday life and an analysis of two cases using music as a creative method have been published by the author together with Signe Ravn in a Danish book (see Ravn & Østergaard, 2018). Thus, I would like to acknowledge Signe for this work. In this chapter, however, I develop the concept of music-talk with the aim of comparing it to photo-talk, and thus I extend and frame the analysis differently. I would also like to thank Professor Janet Boddy for introducing music as a method in our cross-national project Against all Odds?
- 2.
The participating organisations were: LOS—National association of residences, DAV—Conditions of children in care, TABUKA —National Association of present end earlier youngsters in care, FADD—Association of Danish residential homes for children and young people and FBU—National Association of parents.
- 3.
One participant said she could not find a song to share, and another had clearly forgotten about the task but chose a song during the interview. All participants took some photos; however, two participants had clearly forgotten and only took a few photos on their way to the second interview.
- 4.
I suggest that the reader listens to the songs on YouTube to get a sense of how the interview was zoned, as Torben tells his life story.
References
Allett, N. (2010). Sounding out: Using music elicitation in qualitative research (NCRM Working Paper Series 04/10). Manchester: Morgan Centre. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2871/1/0410_music_elicitation.pdf.
Bakketeig, E., Boddy, J., Gundersen, T., Østergaard, J., & Hanrahan, F. (2020). Deconstructing doing well; what can we learn from care experienced young people in England, Denmark and Norway? Children and Youth Services, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105333.
Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547–570.
Berman, H., Ford-Gilboe, M., Moutrey, B., & Cekic, S. (2001). Portraits of pain and promise: A photographic study of Bosnian youth. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32(4), 21–41.
Boddy, J., Bakketeig E., & Østergaard, J. (2019). Navigating precarious times? The experience of young adults who have been in care in Norway, Denmark and England. Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1599102.
Cahill, C. (2007). Doing research with young people: Participatory research and the rituals of collective work. Children’s Geographies, 5(3), 297–312.
Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9(4), 477–497.
Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.
DeNora, T. (1999). Music as a technology of the self. Poetics, 27, 31–56.
DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, J. (2012). Gathering narrative data. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Gallacher, L., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods.’ Childhood, 15(4), 499–515.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Henderson, S., Holland, J., McGrellis, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (2007). Inventing adulthoods: A biographical approach to youth transitions. London: Sage.
Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart. University of California Press.
Holland, J., & Thomson, R. (2009). Gaining perspective on choice and fate: Revisiting critical moments. European Societies, 11(3), 451–469.
Holloway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing qualitative research differently: A psychosocial approach. Sage.
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. Sage.
Irwin, S. (2011). Working across qualitative and quantitative data: Childhood, youth and social inequalities. European Journal of Child and Youth Research, 6, 58–63.
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2012). Leaving care: Looking ahead and aiming higher. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1107–1114.
Janata, P., Tomic, S. T., & Rakowski, S. L. (2007). Characterisation of music-evoked auto-biographical memories. Memory, 15(8), 845–860.
Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2006). For the record: Popular music and photography as technologies of memory. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(2), 149–165.
Kellett, M., Forrest, R., Dent, N., & Ward, S. (2004). Just teach us the skills, we’ll do the rest: Empowering ten-year-olds as active researchers. Children and Society, 18(5), 329–343.
Kesby, M. (2000). Participatory diagramming: Deploying qualitative methods through an action research epistemology. Area, 32(4), 423–435.
Lincoln, S. (2005). Feeling the noise: Teenagers, bedrooms and music. Leisure Studies, 24(4), 399–414.
Mannay, D. (2016). Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Application, reflection and ethics. Routledge.
Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology of childhood. Buckingham: Open University Press.
McLeod, J. (2003). Why We Interview now—reflexivity and perspective in a longitudinal study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 201–211.
McLeod, J., & Thomson, R. (2009). Researching social change. Sage.
Oliffe, J. L., & Bottorff, J. L. (2007). Further than the eye can see? Photo-elicitation and research with men. Qualitative Health Research, 17(6), 850–858.
Punch, S. (2002). Interviewing strategies with young people: The “secret box”, stimulus material and task-based activities. Children and Society, 16, 45–56.
Ravn, S., & Østergaard, J. (2018). En anden fortælling? Musik som metode i interviews med udsatte unge. In M. Pless & N. Sørensen (Eds.), Ungdomsliv: ungeperspektiver som metodisk tilgang (pp. 89–112). Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Rice, K., Primak, S., & Girvin, H. (2013). Through their eyes: Using photography with youth who experienced trauma. The Qualitative Report, 18(52), 1–14.
Thomson, R. (2009). Unfolding lives: Youth, gender and change. Policy.
Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2002) Imagined adulthood: Resources, plans and contradictions. Gender and Education, 14(4), 337–350.
Thomson, R., & Holland, R. (2005). Thanks for the memory: Memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 201–219.
Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2015). Critical moments? The importance of timing in young people’s narratives of transition. In J. Wyn & H. Cahill (Eds.), Handbook of Children and Youth Studies. Springer Reference.
Thomson, R., & McLeod, J. (2015). New frontiers in qualitative longitudinal research: An agenda for research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 243–250.
Thomson, R., Hadfield, L., Kehily, M. J., & Sharpe, S. (2010). Family fortunes: An intergenerational perspective on recession. Twenty-First Century Society, 5, 149–157.
Thomsen, R., Ravn, S., & Østergaard, J. (2013). Tidslinjer som metodisk greb i studiet af vendepunkter i unges livsforløb. In Rasmussen, K. (Ed.), Visuelle tilgange og metoder i tværfaglige pædagogiske studier (pp. 283–308). Samfundslitteratur.
Thomson, R., Bell, J., Holland, S., Henderson, S., McGrellis, S. & Sharpe, S. (2002). Critical moments: Choice, chance and opportunity in young people’s narratives of transition. Sociology, 36(2), 335–354.
van Dijck, J. (2006). Record and hold: Popular music between personal and collective memory. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(5), 357–374.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concepts, methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health, Education and Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
Wilson, S., & Milne, E. (2013). Young people creating belonging, spaces, sounds and sights. University of Stirling.
Funding
This chapter draws on research conducted for the project Against All Odds? funded by the Research Council of Norway. Grant number 236718 and VIVE—the Danish National Center for Social Science Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Østergaard, J. (2021). Photo-Talk and Music-Talk Among Young People (Formerly) in Care. In: Wulf-Andersen, T., Follesø, R., Olsen, T. (eds) Involving Methods in Youth Research. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75941-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75941-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75940-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75941-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)