Skip to main content

Coordinating and Aligning a Service Partner Network for Servitization: A Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Servitization
  • 1496 Accesses

Abstract

Servitization has received increasing attention in the extant literature, yet the understanding of its implications for the service supply network is not as well developed. Servitizing firms are often beholden to external partner organizations for delivering services. To understand the service supply network perspective, we adopt the motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) framework to examine how partner organizations need to be motivated to behave in a way that is congruent with the goals of the focal firm, which requires the focal firm to provide the opportunity and ability for service partners to deliver. We discuss the need for coordination and alignment among the different actors in a service supply network and how changes to one actor’s MOA is likely to impinge on others in the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The MOA framework has typically been used at an individual level to examine human behavior, which can also be applied at an organizational level of analysis (see Karatzas et al., 2020; Raja & Frandsen, 2017).

References

  • Baines, T., Lightfoot, H., Peppard, J., Johnson, M., Tiwari, A., Shehab, E., & Swink, M. (2009). Towards and operations strategy for product-centric servitization. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(5), 494–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastl, M., Johnson, M., Lightfoot, H., & Evans, S. (2012). Buyer-supplier relationships in a servitized environment: An examination with Cannon and Perreault’s framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(6), 650–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigdeli, A. Z., Baines, T., Bustinza, O. F., & Shi, V. G. (2017). Organisational change towards servitization: A theoretical framework. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigdeli, A. Z., Bustinza, O. F., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Baines, T. (2018). Network positioning and risk perception in servitization: Evidence from the UK road transport industry. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2169–2183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J., Hopp, W., McClain, J. O., & Thomas, L. J. (2003). On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5(3), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resources management (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakkol, M., Johnson, M., Raja, J., & Raffoni, A. (2014). From goods to solutions: How does the content of an offering affect network configuration? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 44(1/2), 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finne, M., & Holmström, J. (2013). A manufacturer moving upstream: Triadic collaboration for service delivery. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H. (2006). Entering low-end markets: A new strategy for Swiss companies. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(5), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., & Friedli, T. (2005). Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies. European Management Journal, 23(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedvall, K., Jagstedt, S., & Dubois, A. (2019). Solutions in business networks: Implications of an interorganizational perspective. Journal of Business Research, 104, 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Mena, C. (2008). Supply chain management for servitised products: A multi-industry case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A., & Dainty, A. (2014). Reconceptualizing the service paradox in engineering companies: Is HR a missing link? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(2), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, M., Raja, J. Z., Visnjic, I., & Wiengarten, F. (2019). Paths to service capability development for servitization: Examining an internal service ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 104, 472–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas, A., Papadopoulos, G., & Godsell, J. (2020). Servitization and the effect of training on service delivery system performance. Production and Operations Management, 29(5), 1101–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of texts. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Ed.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 104, 380–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalkowski, C., Kindström, D., & Carlborg, P. (2016). Triadic value propositions: When it takes more than two to tango. Service Science, 8(3), 282–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalkowski, C., Kindström, D., & Witell, L. (2011). Internalisation or externalisation? Examining organisational arrangements for industrial services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, D. J., Moorman, C., & Jaworski, B. J. (1991). Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. The Journal of Marketing, 55, 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parida, V., Sjödin, D. R., Lenka, S., & Wincent, J. (2015). Developing global service innovation capabilities: How global manufacturers address the challenges of market heterogeneity. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabetino, R., Hermsen, W., Kohtamäki, M., & Sihvonen, J. (2018). Structuring servitization-related research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddats, C., Baines, T., Burton, J., Story, V. M., & Zolkiewski, J. (2016). Motivations for servitization: The impact of product complexity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(5), 572–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raja, J. Z., Bourne, D., Goffin, K., Çakkol, M., & Martinez, V. (2013). Achieving customer satisfaction through integrated products and services: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1128–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja, J. Z., & Frandsen, T. (2017). Exploring servitization in China: Challenges of aligning motivation, opportunity, and ability in coordinating an external service partner network. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(11), 1654–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raja, J. Z., Frandsen, T., & Mouritsen, J. (2017). Exploring the managerial dilemmas encountered by advanced analytical equipment providers in developing service-led growth strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reim, W., Sjödin, D. R., & Parida, V. (2019). Servitization of global service network actors—A contingency framework for matching challenges and strategies in service transition. Journal of Business Research, 104, 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. L. (1999). Carrots, sticks, and promises: A conceptual framework for the management of public health and social issue behaviours. The Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudberg, M., & Olhager, J. (2003). Manufacturing networks and supply chains: An operations strategy perspective. Omega, 31(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccani, N., Visintin, F., & Rapaccini, M. (2014). Investigating the linkages between service types and supplier relationships in servitized environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 149, 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2008). How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 426–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, M., & Araujo, L. (2013). Beyond the service factory: Service innovation in manufacturing supply networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windahl, C., & Lakemond, N. (2006). Developing integrated solutions: The importance of relationships within the network. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 806–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R., & Baumgartner, P. (1999). Go downstream: The new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jawwad Z. Raja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raja, J.Z., Frandsen, T. (2021). Coordinating and Aligning a Service Partner Network for Servitization: A Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) Perspective. In: Kohtamäki, M., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of Servitization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75771-7_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics