Abstract
This chapter presents the concept of Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and how it differs from the traditional ways of describing and portraying the literature. Moreover, it critically analyzes the common underlying structure among the SLR methods developed over the past years as well as highlights the improvements required.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bardin, L.: L’analyse de contenu [Content Analysis], p. 223. Presses Universitaires de France Le Psychologue, Paris (1993)
Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: Writing narrative literature reviews. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1(3), 311–320 (1997)
Bhattacherjee, A.: Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, 3rd edn. Textbooks Collection, [S.l.] (2012). 9781475146127
Borrego, M., Foster, M.J., Froyd, J.E.: Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. J. Eng. Educ. 103(1), 45–76 (2014). 1069-4730
Colicchia, C., Strozzi F.: Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. 17(4), 403–418 (2012). 1359-8546
Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V., Valentine, J.C.: Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2nd edn., p. 610. Russel Sage Foundation, New York (2009). 9780871541635
Cornell University Library Evidence Synthesis Service—A Guide to Evidence Synthesis—LibGuides at Cornell University. Disponível em: https://guides.library.cornell.edu/evidence-synthesis/service. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D.: Producing a Systematic Review. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, 1st edn., pp. 671–689. SAGE Publications, London (2009)
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., Vanaken, J.E.: Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organ. Stud. 29(3), 393–413 (2008). 0170-8406
Dresch, A., Lacerda, D.P., Antunes, J.A.V.: Design Science Research: A Method for Scientific and Technology Advancement, p. 161. Springer, [S.l.] (2015). 978-3-319-07373-6
Finfgeld, D.L.: Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qual. Health Res. 13(7), 893–904 (2003). 1049-7323 (Print)r1049-7323 (Linking)
Gauss, L., Lacerda, D.P., Cauchick, M.P.A.: Module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis. J. Intell. Manuf. 32(1), 265–312 (2021)
Glass, G.V.: Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ. Res. 5(10), 3–8 (1976)
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J.: An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, 1st edn., p. 288. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2012). 9781849201803
Hart, C.: Doing a Literature Review: Realising the Social Science Research Imagination, 1st edn., p. 230. SAGE Publications, London (1988)
Higgins, J., Green, S.: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Khan, K.S., et al.: Five steps for a sistematic review. J. r. Soc. Med. 96(1), 118–121 (2003)
Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Engineering 45(4ve), 1051 (2007). 1595933751
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 4th edn., p. 356. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks (2019)
Littell, J.H. Corcoran, J., Pillai, V.: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, pp. 1–211. s.n., [S.l] (2008). 978-0-19-532654-3
Morandi, M.I.W.M., Camargo, L.F.R.: Systematic Literature Review. Design Science Research, P. 161. Springer, [S.l.] (2015)
Palomino, M., Abraham, D., Melendez, K.: Methodologies, methods, techniques and tools used on SLR elaboration: A mapping Studs. Trends and Applications in Software Engineering, pp.14–30. Springer, Cham (2019). 978-3-319-69340-8
Petticrew, M., Roberts, H.: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, 1st edn., p. 336. Blackwell Publishing, MA (2006). 1473314060098
Robinson, P., Lowe, J.: Literature reviews vs systematic reviews. Aust. n. z. J. Public Health 39(2), 103–103 (2015)
Siluo, Y., Qingli, Y.: Are Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics Different? 2017, pp. 1–12. [s.n.], Wuhan (2017)
Smith, V., et al.: Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 11(15), 1–6 (2011)
Snyder, H.: Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 104, 333–339 (2019). Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039>
Systematic vs Literature reviews—Systematic and Literature Reviews—LibGuides at Brown University. Disponível em: https://libguides.brown.edu/Reviews/types. Acesso em: 22 July 2020
Thomé, A.M.T., Scavarda, L.F., Scavarda, A.J.: Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Prod. Plan. Control 27(5), 408–420 (2016)
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P.: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14, 207–222 (2003)
Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 133–151 (2002) 0959-5309
Whiting, P., et al.: ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 69, 225–234 (2016)
Zupic, I., Čater, T.: Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods 18(3), 429–472 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cardoso Ermel, A.P., Lacerda, D.P., Morandi, M.I.W.M., Gauss, L. (2021). Systematic Literature Review. In: Literature Reviews. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75722-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75722-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75721-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75722-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)