Skip to main content

Sustainability and Rural Development Through the Production of Organic Cocoa in Calceta – Ecuador: Economic Analysis and Assessment of the Implications on the Living Standards of Farmers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2021) (ICoWEFS 2021)

Abstract

According to development theory, in the 20th century, the concept of sustainability emerged with three important variables, stability, resilience and adaptability; giving them an economic approach based on productivity, efficiency and effectiveness without neglecting the perceptions of equality and common welfare. Sustainable organic agriculture is a production system that largely avoids or excludes the use of synthetically compounded fertilizers, pesticides, growth regulators, and food additives. Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) is a small sector of all agricultural production in the world. In Latin America, between 70% and 100% of cocoa exports correspond to fine or aroma cocoa, making this region the first producer of this variety at an international level according to the International Cocoa Organization. This paper looks for evaluating the economic sustainability of cocoa production, both in organic and conventional agriculture. An economic analysis was carried out based on a mathematical programming model that projected the maximizations of production and income in Fortaleza del Valle Corporation in Calceta Ecuador. The results show a greater economic sustainability of organic farming compared to conventional agriculture. The higher profitability of organic agriculture was due to the lower requirement of labor and a greater appreciation of the market for organic products that awarded a price higher than conventional prices. Furthermore, the higher profitability of organic agriculture and the use of environmentally friendly inputs in the production process make the farms competitive. Additionally, the environmental results in terms of reducing carbon emissions suggest that the organic system is more effective in mitigating climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An agroecosystem is considered sustainable when it produces, in a state of stable equilibrium, a specific combination of goods and services which satisfy a set of productive goals, without degrading its resources (stability). The level of sustainability will depend on the ability to face and recover quickly form disturbances (resilience); as well as finding new alternative states of stable equilibrium without compromising its productivity and reproducibility. (adaptability) (Masera 2000).

  2. 2.

    Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos.

  3. 3.

    https://www.utm.edu.ec/vinculacion/convenios/2019/file/559-76-convenio-marco-de-cooperacion-interinstitucional-entre-la-universidad-tecnica-de-manabi-y-la-coorporacion-fortaleza-del-valle.

References

  1. Usda, U.: Report and Recommendations on Organic Farming. Washington (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batman, R.: Pesticide Use in Cocoa: A Guide for Training Administrative and Research Staff. ICCO, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Middelbergm, S.L.: Sustainable agriculture: a review of challenges facing the South African agricultural sector. J. Hum. Ecol. 42, 163–163 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tudisca, S., Di Trapani, A.M., Sgroi, F., Testa, R.: The case of Sicilian durum wheat. Org. Farming Econ. Sustain. 15, 93–96 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Encuesta de Superficie y Producción Agropecuaria Continua 2018. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/webinec/Estadisticas_agropecuarias/espac/espac2018/Presentacion%20de%20principales%20resultados.pdf. Accessed 02 July 2020

  6. Ballesteros, H.: ECUADOR: Programa de empleo productivo y. Iniciativa Latinoamericana del Cacao, p. 5 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Encuesta de Superficie y Producción Agropecuaria Continua 2018. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/webinec/Estadisticas_agropecuarias/espac/espac2018/Presentacion%20de%20principales%20resultados.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020

  8. Corporación Fortaleza del Valle: Corporación Fortaleza del Valle . Corporación Fortaleza del Valle. https://fortalezadelvalle.org/. Accessed 07 Apr 2020

  9. Nemes, N.: Comparative analysis of organic and non-organic farming systems: a critical assessment of farm profitability. Food Agric. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Binta, A., Barbier, B.: Economic and environmental performances of organic farming system compared to conventional farming system: a case farm model to simulate the horticultural sector of the Niayes Region in Senegal. J Hortic. 2(4), 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0354.1000152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hazell, P.B., Norton, R.D.: Mathematical Programing for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chavez , G., Olaya, R., Maza , J.: Costo de producción de Cacao clonal ccn-51 en la parroquia Bellamaria, Ecuador. Universidad y Sociedad 10(4), 179–185 (2018). https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlon Arturo Cedeño Álava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Álava, M.A.C., Giband, D., Cruzatty, L.C.G. (2021). Sustainability and Rural Development Through the Production of Organic Cocoa in Calceta – Ecuador: Economic Analysis and Assessment of the Implications on the Living Standards of Farmers. In: da Costa Sanches Galvão, J.R., et al. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2021). ICoWEFS 2021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75315-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics