Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration & Production ((AOGEP))

Abstract

Presence of gas, particularly in young porous sands significantly lowers the bulk modulus and typically creates high amplitude seismic anomalies known as ‘bright spots’, usually considered direct hydrocarbon indicators (DHI). Though high amplitudes are more commonly the characteristic of gas, light and normal grade oil can also manifest high seismic amplitude responses. However, all bright anomalies are not caused due to hydrocarbons and therefore need proper validation before drilling. Other amplitude anomalies such as ‘dim’ and ‘flat spots’ also indicate oil/gas reservoirs and may be considered as DHI anomalies. The genesis of DHI anomalies is illustrated with graphics and seismic images. Evidence of interval velocity, reflection polarity, and phenomena such as reflection ‘shadow zone’ and time ‘sag’ below the, oil/gas reservoirs manifested in seismic corroborate hydrocarbon bearing DHI anomalies and are included in discussion.

Validation of DHI anomalies are commonly done through rigorous AVO analysis on seismic 3D data (Chapter “Shear Wave Seismic, AVO and Vp/Vs Analysis”). However, an alternate simple and straight forward way to validate DHI amplitude anomalies can be by analysing angle- stack amplitudes. Reflection amplitude depends on angle of incidence and the property of angle dependent P-reflectivity at near and far-angle is conveniently utilized to indicate reservoir type and fluid content. The near-angle reflectivity shows the type of reservoir matrix whereas, the far angle the fluid. The quick-look method is useful to delineate and characterize much faster and is expounded with help of case examples of offshore hydrocarbon sands. DHI anomaly related shortcomings are also outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anstey AN (1977) Seismic Interpretation, The physical aspects, record of short course “The new seismic interpreter”. IHRDC, 4.1–4.24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulloch TE (1999) The investigation of fluid properties and seismic attributes for reservoir characterization. Thesis, Michigan Technological University

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark VA (1992) The effect of oil under in-situ conditions on the seismic properties of rocks. Geophysics 57:894–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrom D (2004) The low-frequency gas shadow on seismic sections. Lead Edge 23:772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory AR (1977) Aspects of rock physics from laboratory and log data that are important to seismic interpretation. AAPG Memoir 26:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (1998) Acoustic properties of reservoir fluids. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda NC, Wason A (2013) Seismic rock physics of bright amplitude oil sands—a case study. CSEG Recorder 38(7):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda NC (2017) Quantitative analysis of seismic amplitudes for characterization of Pliocene hydrocarbon sands, Eastern Offshore, India. First Break 35(9):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osif TL (1988) The effect of salt, gas, temperature, and pressure on the compressibility of water. SPE Reservoir Eng, 175–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford SR, Williams RH (1988) Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands. Geophysics 54:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroot BM, Schüttenhelm RTE (2003) Expressions of shallow gas in the Netherlands North Sea, Netherlands. J Geosci 82:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecker U, Knapp S, Smith M, Uden R, Carr M, Taylor G (2004) Reconnaissance of geological prospectivity and reservoir characterization using multiple seismic attributes on 3-D surveys: an example from hydrothermal dolomite, Devonian Slave Point Formation, northeast British Columbia, Canada, CSEG National Convention, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandler A, Evans B, Link C (2007) AVO as a fluid indicator: a physical modelling study. Geophysics 72:C 9–C 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z (2001) Y2K Tutorial- Fundamentals of seismic rock physics. Geophysics 66:398–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Whang LF, Lellis PJ (1988) Bright spots related to high GOR oil reservoir in Green Canyon. In: 58th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abs, pp 761–763

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niranjan C. Nanda .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nanda, N.C. (2021). Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators (DHI). In: Seismic Data Interpretation and Evaluation for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production. Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration & Production. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75301-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics