Abstract
We have a technology fetish. That is, we have an excessive and irrational devotion or commitment to new technologies. This fetish matters. New technologies are too often developed and accepted with little critical thought. After a discussion of the fetish it will be argued that it is not inevitable and that something should be done about it because of potential harms. Finally, suggestions are made for alleviating the potential for those harms. Monitoring and surveillance technologies and artificial intelligence are used to illustrate the argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Government. 2020. COVIDSafe help. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/apps-and-tools/covidsafe-app/covidsafe-help.
Berndt, R.M., & C.H. Berndt. 1999. The world of the first Australians: Aboriginal traditional life. Past and Present, 5. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
Bimber, B. 1994. Three faces of technological determinism, in Smith, Merritt Roe, and Marx, Leo (eds), Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 79–100.
Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brecht, B. 2015. Life of Galileo. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Briggle, Adam, Carl Mitcham, and Martin Ryder. 2005. Technology: overview. In Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics, ed. Carl Mitcham, 1908–1912. Detroit: Thomson, Gale.
Bush, V. 1945. Science, the endless frontier. North Stratford: Ayer Company Publishers.
Cath, C., S. Wachter, B. Mittelstadt, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi. 2018. Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2): 505–528.
Clarke, S. 2009. New technologies, common sense and the paradoxical precautionary principle. In Evaluating new technologies, 159–173. Dordrecht: Springer.
Clarke, R. 2019. Risks inherent in the digital surveillance economy: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology 34 (1): 59–80.
Collingridge, David. 1980. The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Combes, R. 2006. A taxonomy of technics. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1): 5–24.
Corti. 2020. Fighting COVID-19 with artificial intelligence. https://www.corti.ai/.
Crevier, D. 1993. AI: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
Croy, M.J. 1996. Collingridge and the control of educational computer technology. Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal 1 (3/4): 107–115.
Daly, Nadia. 2020. A ‘pandemic drone’ and other technology could help limit the spread of coronavirus and ease restrictions sooner, but at what cost? ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-01/new-surveillance-technology-could-beat-coronavirus-but-at-a-cost/12201552.
Drengson, A.R. 1984. The sacred and the limits of the technological fix. Zygon 19 (3): 259–275.
Dusek, V. 2006. Philosophy of technology: An introduction. Vol. 90. Malden: Blackwell.
Dvorsky, George. 2015. Experts warn UN panel about the dangers of artificial superintelligence. https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2015/10/experts-warn-un-panel-about-the-dangers-of-artificial-superintelligence/.
Ellul, J., J. Wilkinson, and R.K. Merton. 1964. The technological society. Vol. 303. New York: Vintage books.
Evans, Michael, and Carolyn Webb. 2020. Australian police using face recognition software as privacy experts issue warning. The Age. January 19. https://www.theage.com.au/national/australian-police-using-face-recognition-software-as-privacy-experts-issue-warning-20200119-p53ssj.html.
Ferré, F. 1995. Philosophy of technology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Flood, J., and D. Wylie. 2006. The original Australians: Story of the aboriginal people crows nest. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Floridi, Luciano. 2018. True AI is both logically possible and utterly implausible. Aeon Essays. Aeon, 15 May. https://aeon.co/essays/true-ai-is-both-logically-possible-and-utterly-implausible.
Forester, T., and P. Morrison. 1990. Computer ethics: Cautionary tales and ethical dilemmas in computing. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
Graham, M. 1999. Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of aboriginal worldviews. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 3 (2): 105–118.
Healy, Blathnaid. 2014. Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end humankind. https://mashable.com/2014/12/02/stephen-hawking-artificial-intelligence-bbc/.
Hertz, D.B. 1970. The technological imperative—Social implications of professional technology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 389 (1): 95–106.
Hornborg, A. 1992. Machine fetishism, value, and the image of unlimited good: Towards a thermodynamics of imperialism. Man 27: 1–18.
———. 2014. Technology as fetish: Marx, Latour, and the cultural foundations of capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (4): 119–140.
Hottois, G. 2015. Technoscience (trans: Lynch JA). In: Holbrook, Britt, J (ed. in Chief) Ethics, science, technology engineering: A global resource (pp. 334–337). Gale, Cengage Learning, Farmington Hills, MI.
Hunt, Pete. 2018. China’s great social credit leap forward, The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/12/chinas-great-social-credit-leap-forward/.
Huntley, Rebecca. 2020. How to talk about climate change in a way that makes a difference. Sydney: Murdoch Books.
Johnson, Deborah. 1985. Computer ethics. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Joy, B. 2000. Why the future doesn’t need us. In Nanoethics. The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology (17–30).
Kean, Sam. 2017. The Soviet Era’s deadliest scientist is regaining popularity in Russia. The Atlantic., 19 December. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/12/trofim-lysenko-soviet-union-russia/548786/.
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press.
———. 2007. Scientific research–who should govern? NanoEthics 1 (3): 177–184.
Kobie, N. 2019. The complicated truth about China’s social credit system. Wired. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-social-credit-system-explained.
Kuflik, A. 1999. Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy? Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3): 173–184.
Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. University of Chicago press.
Lakatos, Imre, 1974, “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, Criticism and the growth of knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 91-196.
Lemmens, P., V. Blok, and J. Zwier. 2017. Toward a terrestrial turn in philosophy of technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3): 114–126.
Lenman, J. 2001. On becoming redundant or what computers shouldn’t do. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1): 1–11.
Marx, Karl. 1867. Das Capital vol. 1 part one section 4. Online https://web.stanford.edu/~davies/Symbsys100-Spring0708/Marx-Commodity-Fetishism.pdf.
Marx, L. 1983. Are science and society going in the same direction? Science, Technology, & Human Values 8 (4): 6–9.
Mathews, Freya. 2019. Why has environmental ethics failed to achieve a moral reorientation of the West? ABC Religion & Ethics. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/why-has-environmental-ethics-failed-to-achieve-a-moral-reorient/11216540.
Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2018. The enigma of reason: A new theory of human understanding, UK, Penguin Random House.
Nissenbaum, H. 2001. How computer systems embody values. Computer 34 (3): 120–119.
Nossal Sir. G. 2007. Introduction, ethically challenged: Big questions for science, Mills J, series editor, the Alfred Deakin Debate, The Miegunyah Press, Melbourne.
O’Brien, Matt 2020. Surveillance is everywhere at the CES gadget show, The Age, Jan 7. https://www.theage.com.au/technology/surveillance-is-everywhere-at-the-ces-gadget-show-20200107-p53pep.html.
Ortega y Gasset, José. 1961. Man the technician, History as a system: And other essays toward a philosophy of history, translated by Helene Weyl, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1961, 87–161.
Oxford. 2020. Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com, https://www.lexico.com/definition/fetish.
Pascoe, Bruce. 2012. Aboriginal agriculture, technology and ingenuity, Chapter 2. http://education.abc.net.au/home#!/digibook/3122184/bruce-pascoe-aboriginal-agriculture-technology-and-ingenuity.
———. 2017. Convincing ground: Learning to fall in love with your country. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
Polanyi, M. 1962. The republic of science. Minerva 1 (1): 54–73.
Pollack, Andrew. 1992. Fifth generation’ became Japan’s lost generation. The New York Times (June 5). https://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/05/business/fifth-generation-became-japan-s-lost-generation.html.
Quine, W.V. 1970. Philosophy of logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Roeser, S. 2006. The role of emotions in judging the moral acceptability of risks. Safety Science 44 (8): 689–700.
Russell, S., D. Dewey, and M. Tegmark. 2015. Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Magazine 36 (4): 105–114.
Ryan, J.C. 2015. “No more boomerang”: Environment and technology in contemporary aboriginal Australian poetry. Humanities 4 (4): 938–957.
Samuelson, Kate. 2016. 5 things to know about ‘Molecular Machines’, Time, https://time.com/4519282/molecular-machines-nobel-prize/.
Scott, D. 2011. The technological fix criticisms and the agricultural biotechnology debate. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3): 207–226.
Sharkey, A. 2019. Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity. Ethics and Information Technology 21 (2): 75–87.
Soltanzadeh, S. 2016. Questioning two assumptions in the metaphysics of technological objects. Philosophy & Technology 29 (2): 127–135.
Sprenger, P. 1999. Sun on privacy: ‘Get over it’. Wired News 26: 1–4. http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538.
Tegmark, Max. 2018. Benefits & Risks of Artificial Intelligence. Future of Life Institute, https://declara.com/content/N5vPEl71.
Tighe, Alex, and Andre, Julia. 2020. The Australian behind Clearview AI, a facial recognition software, says it is being used here. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Tuesday 17 March, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-23/australian-founder-of-clearview-facial-recognition-interview/11887112.
Trivium China. 2019. Understanding China’s social credit system. socialcredit.triviumchina.com.
Twohig-Bennett, C., and A. Jones. 2018. The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research 166: 628–637.
Van den Hoven, Jeroen. 1999. Privacy and the varieties of informational wrongdoing. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 1: 30–43.
Webster, M.D. 2017. Questioning technological determinism through empirical research. Symposion 4 (1): 107–125.
Weckert, J. 2012, In defence of the precautionary principle, IEEE Technology & Society Winter, 12–17.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. 1984. Computer power and human reason: From judgement to calculation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Wingspread. 1998. Wingspread statement on the precautionary principle. www.gdrc.org/u-gov/precaution-3.html.
Winner, L. 1986. The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wootson, Cleve R. 2017. Elon Musk doesn’t think we’re prepared to face humanity’s biggest threat: Artificial intelligence, Washington Post, July 17, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2017/07/16/elon-musk-doesnt-think-were-prepared-to-face-humanitys-biggest-threat-artificial-intelligence/.
Wu, S.S. 2020. Autonomous vehicles, trolley problems, and the law. Ethics and Information Technology 22 (1): 1–13.
Zuboff, S. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power: Barack Obama’s books of 2019. London: Profile books.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the editors of this volume and the anonymous reviews of this chapter for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Weckert, J. (2022). Our Technology Fetish. In: Lundgren, B., Nuñez Hernández, N.A. (eds) Philosophy of Computing. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75267-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75267-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75266-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75267-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)