Skip to main content

Upper Dominating Set: Tight Algorithms for Pathwidth and Sub-exponential Approximation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12701))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An upper dominating set is a minimal dominating set in a graph. In the Upper Dominating Set problem, the goal is to find an upper dominating set of maximum size. We study the complexity of parameterized algorithms for Upper Dominating Set, as well as its sub-exponential approximation. First, we prove that, under ETH, k -Upper Dominating Set cannot be solved in time \(O(n^{o(k)})\) (improving on \(O(n^{o(\sqrt{k})})\)), and in the same time we show under the same complexity assumption that for any constant ratio r and any \(\varepsilon > 0\), there is no r-approximation algorithm running in time \(O(n^{k^{1-\varepsilon }})\). Then, we settle the problem’s complexity parameterized by pathwidth by giving an algorithm running in time \(O^*(6^{pw})\) (improving the current best \(O^*(7^{pw})\)), and a lower bound showing that our algorithm is the best we can get under the SETH. Furthermore, we obtain a simple sub-exponential approximation algorithm for this problem: an algorithm that produces an r-approximation in time \(n^{O(n/r)}\), for any desired approximation ratio \(r < n\). We finally show that this time-approximation trade-off is tight, up to an arbitrarily small constant in the second exponent: under the randomized ETH, and for any ratio \(r > 1\) and \(\varepsilon > 0\), no algorithm can output an r-approximation in time \(n^{(n/r)^{1-\varepsilon }}\). Hence, we completely characterize the approximability of the problem in sub-exponential time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(O^*\) notation suppresses polynomial factors in the input size.

References

  1. Arkin, E.M., Bender, M.A., Mitchell, J.S.B., Skiena, S.: The lazy bureaucrat scheduling problem. Inf. Comput. 184(1), 129–146 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-5401(03)00060-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bazgan, C., Brankovic, L., Casel, K., Fernau, H.: Domination chain: characterisation, classical complexity, parameterised complexity and approximability. Discrete Appl. Math. 280, 23–42 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bazgan, C., et al.: The many facets of upper domination. Theor. Comput. Sci. 717, 2–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2017.05.042

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnet, E., Escoffier, B., Kim, E.J., Paschos, V.T.: On subexponential and FPT-time inapproximability. In: Parameterized and Exact Computation - 8th International Symposium, IPEC 2013, Sophia Antipolis, France, 4–6 September 2013, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 54–65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03898-8_6

  5. Boria, N., Croce, F.D., Paschos, V.T.: On the max min vertex cover problem. In: Approximation and Online Algorithms - 11th International Workshop, WAOA 2013, Sophia Antipolis, France, 5–6 September 2013, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 37–48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08001-7_4

  6. Bourgeois, N., Croce, F.D., Escoffier, B., Paschos, V.T.: Fast algorithms for min independent dominating set. Discret. Appl. Math. 161(4–5), 558–572 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2012.01.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalermsook, P., Laekhanukit, B., Nanongkai, D.: Independent set, induced matching, and pricing: Connections and tight (subexponential time) approximation hardnesses. In: 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2013, 26–29 October 2013, Berkeley, CA, USA, pp. 370–379 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2013.47

  8. Chen, J., Huang, X., Kanj, I.A., Xia, G.: Strong computational lower bounds via parameterized complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 72(8), 1346–1367 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2006.04.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheston, G.A., Fricke, G., Hedetniemi, S.T., Jacobs, D.P.: On the computational complexity of upper fractional domination. Discret. Appl. Math. 27(3), 195–207 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(90)90065-K

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cygan, M., et al.: Parameterized Algorithms. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dublois, L., Hanaka, T., Ghadikolaei, M.K., Lampis, M., Melissinos, N.: (In)approximability of maximum minimal FVS. CoRR abs/2009.09971 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09971

  12. Eto, H., Hanaka, T., Kobayashi, Y., Kobayashi, Y.: Parameterized algorithms for maximum cut with connectivity constraints. In: 14th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IPEC 2019, 11–13 September 2019, Munich, Germany, pp. 13:1–13:15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2019.13

  13. Furini, F., Ljubic, I., Sinnl, M.: An effective dynamic programming algorithm for the minimum-cost maximal knapsack packing problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(2), 438–448 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.061

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gourvès, L., Monnot, J., Pagourtzis, A.: The lazy bureaucrat problem with common arrivals and deadlines: approximation and mechanism design. In: Fundamentals of Computation Theory - 19th International Symposium, FCT 2013, Liverpool, UK, 19–21 August 2013. Proceedings, pp. 171–182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40164-0_18

  15. Halldórsson, M.M.: Approximating the minimum maximal independence number. Inf. Process. Lett. 46(4), 169–172 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(93)90022-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanaka, T., Bodlaender, H.L., van der Zanden, T.C., Ono, H.: On the maximum weight minimal separator. Theor. Comput. Sci. 796, 294–308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.09.025

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanaka, T., Katsikarelis, I., Lampis, M., Otachi, Y., Sikora, F.: Parameterized orientable deletion. In: Eppstein, D. (ed.) 16th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory, SWAT 2018, 18–20 June 2018, Malmö, Sweden. LIPIcs, vol. 101, pp. 24:1–24:13. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.24

  18. Haynes, T.W., Hedetniemi, S.T., Slater, P.J.: Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 208. Dekker, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hurink, J.L., Nieberg, T.: Approximating minimum independent dominating sets in wireless networks. Inf. Process. Lett. 109(2), 155–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2008.09.021

  20. Jaffke, L., Jansen, B.M.P.: Fine-grained parameterized complexity analysis of graph coloring problems. In: Fotakis, D., Pagourtzis, A., Paschos, V.T. (eds.) CIAC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10236, pp. 345–356. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57586-5_29

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsikarelis, I., Lampis, M., Paschos, V.T.: Structural parameters, tight bounds, and approximation for (k, r)-center. In: Okamoto, Y., Tokuyama, T. (eds.) 28th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, ISAAC 2017, 9–12 December 2017, Phuket, Thailand. LIPIcs, vol. 92, pp. 50:1–50:13. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2017.50

  22. Katsikarelis, I., Lampis, M., Paschos, V.T.: Structurally parameterized d-scattered set. In: Brandstädt, A., Köhler, E., Meer, K. (eds.) Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science - 44th International Workshop, WG 2018, Cottbus, Germany, 27–29 June 2018, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11159, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00256-5_24

  23. Lampis, M.: Finer tight bounds for coloring on clique-width. In: Chatzigiannakis, I., Kaklamanis, C., Marx, D., Sannella, D. (eds.) 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2018, 9–13 July 2018, Prague, Czech Republic. LIPIcs, vol. 107, pp. 86:1–86:14. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.86

  24. Lokshtanov, D., Marx, D., Saurabh, S.: Known algorithms on graphs of bounded treewidth are probably optimal. ACM Trans. Algorithms 14(2), 13:1–13:30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3170442

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zehavi, M.: Maximum minimal vertex cover parameterized by vertex cover. In: Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2015–40th International Symposium, MFCS 2015, Milan, Italy, 24–28 August 2015, Proceedings, Part II. pp. 589–600 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48054-0_49

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Dublois .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dublois, L., Lampis, M., Paschos, V.T. (2021). Upper Dominating Set: Tight Algorithms for Pathwidth and Sub-exponential Approximation. In: Calamoneri, T., Corò, F. (eds) Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12701. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75242-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75242-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75241-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75242-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics