Skip to main content

Determining the Number of Groups in Cluster Analysis Using Classical Indexes and Stability Measures—Comparison of Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Analysis and Classification (SKAD 2020)

Abstract

In the context of taxonomic methods, in recent years, much attention has been paid to the issue of the stability of these methods, i.e., the answer to the question: to what extent the structure discovered by a given method is actually present in the data. This criterion examines whether the groups that were created as a result of using clustering method to a set of objects are real (the structure is stable), or whether they appeared accidentally. Most often this criterion is used when selecting the number of groups (k), for which should be clustered a set of data. The aim of the article is to compare the results in terms of the indicated correct number of groups by classical indexes and stability measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Packages clv, clValid and fpc, were also selected because the methods implemented there have been the subject of the author’s research for a long time (e.g., Rozmus 2017).

  2. 2.

    This measure is implemented by the function cls.stab.sim.ind in clv package in R.

  3. 3.

    This measure is implemented by the function cls.stab.opt.assign in clv package in R.

  4. 4.

    This measure can be found in clValid package in R.

  5. 5.

    This measure can be found in fpc package in R. It includes two functions for measuring stability: clusterboot and nselectboot. In the experiments only the nselectboot function was used.

  6. 6.

    The indexes were calculated using the functions from the clusterSim and clusterCrit packages.

References

  • Ben-Hur A, Guyon I (2003) Detecting stable clusters using principal component analysis. Methods Mol Biol 224:159–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Borys T (ed) (2005) WskaĹşniki zrĂłwnowaĹĽonego rozwoju. Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i Ĺšrodowisko, Warszawa-BiaĹ‚ystok

    Google Scholar 

  • Borys T (2014) Wybrane problemy metodologii pomiaru nowego paradygmatu rozwoju—polskie doĹ›wiadczenia. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne 3(69):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock G, Pihur V, Datta S, Datta S (2008) clValid: an R package for cluster validation. J Stat Softw 25(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Wang J (2012) Selection of the number of clusters via the bootstrap method. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:468–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning C (2007) Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:258–271

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lord E, Willems M, Lapointe FJ, Makarenkov V (2017) Using the stability of objects to determine the number of clusters in datasets. Inf Sci 393:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorek E (2011) Ekonomia zrĂłwnowaĹĽonego rozwoju w badaniach polskich i niemieckich. In: Kos B (ed) Transformacja gospodarki—poziom krajowy i miÄ™dzynarodowy. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 90:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino V, Presti LL (2019) Stay in touch! New insights into end-user attitudes towards engagement platforms. J Consum Mark 36:772–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozmus D (2017) Using R packages for comparison of cluster stability. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica 330(4):77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir O, Tishby N (2008) Cluster stability for finite samples. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 20:1297–1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki R, Shimodaira H (2006) Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22(12):1540–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich Z, Barzily Z, Toledano-Kitai D, Avros R (2010) The Hotteling’s metric as a cluster stability index. Comput Model New Technol 14(4):65–72

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2010) Consistent selection of the number of clusters via cross-validation, “Biometrika”, 97:893–904

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorota Rozmus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rozmus, D. (2021). Determining the Number of Groups in Cluster Analysis Using Classical Indexes and Stability Measures—Comparison of Results. In: Jajuga, K., Najman, K., Walesiak, M. (eds) Data Analysis and Classification. SKAD 2020. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75190-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics