Skip to main content

Hospitable Multiculturalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religiosity and Recognition

Part of the book series: Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series ((CAL))

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

Following on from the in-depth discussions of the empirical material and the debates and arguments of previous chapters, this chapter discusses more directly the implications that emerge towards multiculturalism’s notion of recognition and relates this more fully to that of hospitality drawn from political theology. It considers multiculturalism’s shortcomings vis-à-vis religion and how and why recognition may in fact be misrecognition as a result of an ethno-religious lens. It also goes on to consider two further features of recognition and hospitality, judgement and dialogue. Here it suggests that despite the short-comings identified, multiculturalism retains relevance but needs to be made more hospitable within in its own terms of reference. The result is a series of challenges for Muslims, converts and majority society alike; challenges that are, moreover, underpinned by a substantive difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The audience Bretherton addresses is as much the church itself as those that would restrict it in such ways as well as a caution over how worship can be instrumentalised for political purposes by some within the church.

  2. 2.

    As has already been noted, a fuller consideration of Bretherton’s political vision of democratic politics is beyond the scope of this book.

References

  • Acheraïou, A. (2011). Questioning Hybridity. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, J. A., Gale, R., Owen, P., Peach, C. & Weller, P. (2006). Review of the Evidence Base on Faith Communities. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingham, P. (2019). Shaping religion: The limits of transformative liberalism. In J. Seglow & A. Shorten (Eds.), Religion and Political Theology: Secularism, Accommodation and the New Challenges of Religious Diversity (pp. 57–77). ECPR Press, Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, L. (2010). Christianity and Contemporary Politics: The Conditions and Possibilities of Faithful Witness. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, L. (2016 [2006]). Hospitality as Holiness: Christian Witness Amid Moral Diversity. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, L. (2019). Christ and the Common Life: Political Theology and the Case for Democracy. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brice, M. A. K. (2010). A Minority within a Minority: A Report on Converts to Islam in the United Kingdom, Faith Matters. http://faith-matters.org/images/stories/fmreports/a-minority-within-a-minority-a-report-on-converts-to-islam-in-theuk.pdf. Last accessed 18 June 2018.

  • Calhoun, C. (2010). Rethinking secularism. The Hedgehog Review, 12(3), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J. (2008). Talking God: The Legitimacy of Religious Public Reasoning. Theos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J. (2011). Multiculturalism: A Christian Revival. Theos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, D., & Khanum, N. (2009). “Soft” segregation: Muslim identity, British secularism. In A. Dinham, R. Furbey & V. Lowndes (Eds.), Faith in the Public Realm: Controversies, Policies and Practices. The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain (CMEB). (2000). The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, G. (2012). Thinking sociologically about religion: Implications for faith communities. Review of Religious Research, 54(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davie, G. (2015). Religion in Britain: A Persistent Paradox (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, A. (2009). Faiths, Public Policy and Civil Society: Problems, Policies, Controversies. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or why liberals are incapable of thinking about hate speech. Critical Inquiry, 23(2), 378–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2013 [1960]). Truth and Method. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, A. E. (2004). Toleration as Recognition. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T. G. (2008). To be “Danish”, becoming “Muslim”: Contestations of national identity? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(3), 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2006). Equality, recognition and difference. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2017). Liberalism’s Religion. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meer, N. (2010). Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, N. (2018). Misrecognising Muslim consciousness in Europe. In A. Yaqin, P. Morey & A. Soliman (Eds.), Muslims, Trust and Multiculturalism (pp. 97–122). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2014). “We don't do God”? Secularism and the accommodation of Muslims in western Europe. The Political Studies Association. https://www.psa.ac.uk/insight-plus/blog/%E2%80%98we-don%E2%80%99t-do-god%E2%80%99-secularism-and-accommodation-muslims-western-europe. Last accessed 25 June 2018.

  • Modood, T. (2015 [1997]). ”Difference”, cultural racism and anti-racism. In T. Modood & P. Werbner (Eds.), Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism (pp. 154–172). Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2017). Intercultural public intellectual engagement. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Interculturalism at the Crossroads: Comparative Perspectives on Concepts (pp. 83–103). UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2019). Essays on Secularism and Multiculturalism. ECPR Press Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2020a). The British “battle of the name.” Nations and Nationalism, 26(3), 515–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2020b). Multiculturalism as a new form of nationalism? Nations and Nationalism, 26(2), 308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2006). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. (2020). Cohesive Societies: Faith and Belief. The British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2005). The Course of Recognition. Translated by David Pellauer. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2006). On Translation. Translated by Eileen Brennan. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilbrack, K. (2020). Hospitality and the ethics of religious diversity. Religious Studies, 56, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannahan, C. (2017). Zombie multiculturalism meets liberative difference: Searching for a new discourse of diversity. Religion and Culture, 17(4), 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, L. (2010). British female converts to Islam: Choosing Islam as a rejection of individualism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2011). Hospitality as translation. In R. Kearnery & P. Taylor (Eds.), Hosting the Stranger: Between Religions (pp. 11–22). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, B. (2008). Political Islam, World Politics and Europe: Democratic Peace and Euro-Islam versus Global Jihad. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2001). Beyond liberalism. Political Theology, 3(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2006). Secularism, faith, and freedom. http://aoc2013.brix.fatbeehive.com/articles.php/1175/rome-lecture-secularism-faith-and-freedom.

  • Woodhead, L. (2012). Introduction. In L. Woodhead & R. Catto (Eds.), Religion and Change in Modern Britain. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Sealy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sealy, T. (2021). Hospitable Multiculturalism. In: Religiosity and Recognition. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75127-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75127-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75126-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75127-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics